山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (8): 56-63.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2026.0349
• 临床医学 • 上一篇
吕高钰1,2,3,薛美娟4,徐俊杰1,2,3,刘亚楠1,2,3,张晴阳1,2,3,侯明1,2,3,石艳1,2,3
LYU Gaoyu1,2,3, XUE Meijuan4, XU Junjie1,2,3, LIU Yanan1,2,3, ZHANG Qingyang1,2,3, HOU Ming1,2,3, SHI Yan1,2,3
摘要: 目的 探讨维奈克拉联合阿扎胞苷方案(简称VA方案)治疗初诊老年不适合强化疗急性髓系白血病(acute myeloid leukemia, AML)患者获得骨髓缓解后,影响其血液学恢复的临床及遗传学因素,为临床个体化治疗提供依据。 方法 回顾性分析2020年4月至2025年10月山东大学齐鲁医院血液科初诊老年AML患者 61 例,其中男33例,女28例,60~81(67.9)岁;均采用 VA 方案治疗,根据2022版欧洲白血病网(European leukemia net, ELN)AML疗效评估标准将治疗后达骨髓缓解患者,分为完全缓解(complete remission, CR)组(n=29)和骨髓缓解伴血液学不完全恢复(complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery, CRi)组(n=32);比较两组临床及基因特征,采用logistic回归分析CRi的独立危险因素。将1周期CRi且2周期仍为CRi定义为持续血液学不缓解,CRi组根据第2周期疗效分为转为CR组(n=13)和持续血液学不缓解组(n=16),进一步比较两组危险因素分布差异。 结果 多因素logistic回归分析显示,骨髓纤维化≥2级、ELN中高危分层、TP53突变是发生 CRi 的独立危险因素(OR=5.75,95%CI:1.24~41.57,P=0.041;OR=8.57,95%CI:1.92~61.25,P=0.011;OR=9.33,95%CI:1.55~179.60,P=0.042)。13例(40.63%)CRi 患者在第2周期转为CR且其中11例(84.6%)可维持,16例(50.00%)CRi 患者持续血液学不缓解,且持续血液学不缓解组中骨髓纤维化≥2级、TP53突变占比增高。 结论 接受VA方案治疗的初诊老年AML患者,其血液学恢复受骨髓纤维化程度、ELN分层和TP53突变影响。其中骨髓纤维化≥2级和TP53突变是导致血液学不完全恢复的核心独立危险因素。部分 CRi 患者可通过延长治疗周期实现缓解,但中重度纤维化患者更易出现持续不缓解,临床需个体化监测与干预。
中图分类号:
| [1] Kantarjian H M, DiNardo C D, Kadia T M, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia management and research in 2025[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2025, 75(1): 46-67. [2] Döhner H, Wei A H, Appelbaum F R, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN[J]. Blood, 2022, 140(12): 1345-1377. [3] Löwenberg B, Ossenkoppele G J, van Putten W, et al. High-dose daunorubicin in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361(13): 1235-1248. [4] Fernandez H F, Sun Z, Yao X, et al. Anthracycline dose intensification in acute myeloid leukemia[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361(13): 1249-1259. [5] Sasaki K, Ravandi F, Kadia T M, et al. De novo acute myeloid leukemia: a population-based study of outcome in the United States based on the Surveillance, Epidemio-logy, and End Results(SEER)database, 1980 to 2017[J]. Cancer, 2021, 127(12): 2049-2061. [6] Kantarjian H, Kadia T, DiNardo C, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia: current progress and future directions[J]. Blood Cancer J, 2021, 11(2): 41. DOI:10.1038/s41408-021-00425-3 [7] DiNardo C D, Jonas B A, Pullarkat V, et al. Azacitidine and venetoclax in previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 383(7): 617-629. [8] Chua C C, Loo S, Fong C Y, et al. Final analysis of the phase 1b chemotherapy and venetoclax in elderly acute myeloid leukemia trial(CAVEAT)[J]. Blood Adv, 2025, 9(8): 1827-1835. [9] Çiftçiler R, Haznedaro glu(·overI)C, Sayınalp N, et al. The impact of early versus late platelet and neutrophil recovery after induction chemotherapy on survival outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Turk J Haematol, 2020, 37(2): 116-120. [10] 中华医学会血液学分会白血病淋巴瘤学组. 成人急性髓系白血病(非急性早幼粒细胞白血病)中国诊疗指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华血液学杂志, 2023, 44(9): 705-712. Leukemia & Lymphoma Group, Chinese Society of Hematology, Chinese Medical Association. Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of adult acute myeloid leukemia(non-acute promyelocytic leukemia)(2023 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Hematology, 2023, 44(9): 705-712. [11] Agarwal S K, DiNardo C D, Potluri J, et al. Management of venetoclax-posaconazole interaction in acute myeloid leukemia patients: evaluation of dose adjustments[J]. Clin Ther, 2017, 39(2): 359-367. [12] Arber D A, Orazi A, Hasserjian R P, et al. International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data[J]. Blood, 2022, 140(11): 1200-1228. [13] Urrutia S, Kantarjian H M, Ravandi-Kashani F, et al. Outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia and bone marrow fibrosis[J]. J Hematol Oncol, 2024, 17(1): 112. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-024-01627-7 [14] Jain A G, Volpe V O, Wang C, et al. Outcomes by best response with hypomethylating agent plus venetoclax in adults with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Ann Hematol, 2025, 104(1): 307-315. [15] Abou Zahr A, Salama M E, Carreau N, et al. Bone marrow fibrosis in myelofibrosis: pathogenesis, prognosis and targeted strategies[J]. Haematologica, 2016, 101(6): 660-671. [16] Yao J C, Oetjen K A, Wang T J, et al. TGF-β signaling in myeloproliferative neoplasms contributes to myelofibrosis without disrupting the hematopoietic niche[J]. J Clin Invest, 2022, 132(11): e154092. DOI: 10.1172/JCI154092 [17] Hwang J, Kim H N, Kwon J A, et al. Impact of TP53 mutation on genetic and cellular hierarchy profile in complex karyotype AML/MDS with increased blasts[J]. Blood Cancer J, 2024, 14(1): 201. DOI: 10.1038/s41408-024-01188-3 [18] Liu Y, Elf S E, Miyata Y, et al. p53 regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2009, 4(1): 37-48. [19] Asai T, Liu Y, Bae N, et al. The p53 tumor suppressor protein regulates hematopoietic stem cell fate[J]. J Cell Physiol, 2011, 226(9): 2215-2221. [20] Cho H J, Lee J, Yoon S R, et al. Regulation of hematopoietic stem cell fate and malignancy[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21(13): 4780. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21134780 [21] Kirschner K, Chandra T, Kiselev V, et al. Proliferation drives aging-related functional decline in a subpopulation of the hematopoietic stem cell compartment[J]. Cell Rep, 2017, 19(8): 1503-1511. [22] Menendez-Gonzalez J B, Vukovic M, Abdelfattah A, et al. Gata2 as a crucial regulator of stem cells in adult hematopoiesis and acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Stem Cell Reports, 2019, 13(2): 291-306. [23] Peters I J A, de Pater E, Zhang W. The role of GATA2 in adult hematopoiesis and cell fate determination[J]. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2023, 11:1250827. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1250827 [24] Sportoletti P, Sorcini D, Falini B. BCOR gene alterations in hematologic diseases[J]. Blood, 2021, 138(24): 2455-2468. [25] 陈家祺, 耿英华. 以维奈克拉为基础的联合治疗在急性髓系白血病中的研究进展[J]. 中国实验血液学杂志, 2026, 34(2): 600-604. Chen Jiaqi, Geng Yinghua. Research progress of venetoclax-based combination therapy in acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Journal of Experimental Hematology, 2026, 34(2): 600-604. [26] 战榕. Bcl-2抑制剂在急性髓系白血病中的研究进展:第62届美国血液学年会报道[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2021, 34(5): 298-301. Zhan Rong. Research progress of Bcl-2 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia: report from the 62nd American Society of Hematology annual meeting[J]. Journal of Clinical Hematology, 2021, 34(5): 298-301. [27] Wang H, Wang X, Shi T, et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor plus venetoclax and azacitidine in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter phase 2 trial[J]. Blood Cancer J, 2025, 15(1): 184. DOI: 10.1038/s41408-025-01389-4 [28] Goto T, Numata H, Katsuoka Y, et al. Real-world experience with venetoclax treatment for newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in Japan(VENUS study): an interim analysis focusing on neutropenia management[J]. Oncol Ther, 2025, 13(2): 519-527. |
| [1] | 陈功海,曲春媚,谢雪雪,王刚,赵连晖,赛林涛,许楠楠. 布病脊柱炎的临床特征及危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(8): 1-7. |
| [2] | 薛宁,魏绪霞,徐俊杰,唐运萍,杨露. 不同年龄组儿童艰难梭菌感染临床特点及预后影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(7): 55-62. |
| [3] | 黄玉真,吕琛,颜磊,李帅帅,张景雪,刘超,王银霞,桑岩岩,房鹛. 基于危险因素筛查的延续性院外管理对卵巢过度刺激综合征的预防效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 92-99. |
| [4] | 逄锦宏,苏萍,乔俊鹏,陈巧巧,陈学禹,赵颖颖,施婕,孙晓茹,李秋春,何蕊言,范轶欧,迟蔚蔚. 老年人群可改变心血管危险因素聚集模式与脑卒中的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 11-19. |
| [5] | 张政,王建伟,杨玉娟,张宇,宋西成. 哮喘儿童2008及2019年免疫球蛋白E变化及相关危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 32-36. |
| [6] | 李敬,郝盼盼. 急性心力衰竭患者出入院心率变化与预后相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 75-82. |
| [7] | 程震宇,来庆国,吴梦涛. 髂股静脉支架置入术后再狭窄的影响因素研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(12): 112-117. |
| [8] | 程跃启,王斐,于理想,郑超,余之刚. 曲妥珠单抗致HER2阳性乳腺癌患者心脏毒性的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 17-24. |
| [9] | 王浙宇,许懿,赵昌波,杨硕菲,倪其泓,陈佳佺,王韦仑,李一男,郭相江,叶猛,张岚,薛冠华. 腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后发生髂支闭塞的危险因素及处理对策[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 101-107. |
| [10] | 郭鑫,孟君,郑世良,董秀红. 老年胃癌患者衰弱与人体成分的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 40-47. |
| [11] | 李建,孙云. 新入维持性血液透析患者2年内死亡的危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 48-53. |
| [12] | 宋甜田,李作坤,王书会. 个体化预测老年心脏瓣膜置换术后医院感染风险Nomogram模型的构建[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(1): 48-56. |
| [13] | 曲永强,赵泽宇,吴兴原,韩玮,段瑞生,李衍滨,李亨. 颈动脉分叉处支架置入术后严重持续性低血压的危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 78-82. |
| [14] | 宋晗,王振华,韦铎亮,徐凯,李博文,赵鑫. 术前MELD分级对304例急性StandfordA型主动脉夹层患者术后早期结局的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 31-36. |
| [15] | 张蒙,马伟. 1990—2019年中国人类免疫缺陷病毒/获得性免疫缺陷综合征流行趋势及疾病负担[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 84-89. |
|
||