您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (2): 67-76.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.0837

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于双向孟德尔随机化法探讨组织蛋白酶与衰弱的因果关联

杨慧,苏士晶,李芬   

  1. 海南医学院第二附属医院全科医学科, 海南 海口 570311
  • 出版日期:2025-03-10 发布日期:2025-03-07
  • 通讯作者: 李芬. E-mail:852526247@qq.com

Study on the causal relationship between cathepsins and risk of frailty based on bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization

YANG Hui, SU Shijing, LI Fen   

  1. Department of General Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570311, Hainan, China
  • Online:2025-03-10 Published:2025-03-07

摘要: 目的 采用双向两样本孟德尔随机化(two-sample Mendelian randomization, TSMR)方法,从遗传学角度探讨9种组织蛋白酶与衰弱指数之间的因果关系,以期为未来衰弱的预防和治疗策略提供新的见解。 方法 9种组织蛋白酶(B、E、F、G、H、L2、O、S和Z)的全基因组关联(genome-wide association study, GWAS)汇总数据来自一项包括3 301名欧洲血统受试者的INTERVAL;衰弱指数的GWAS汇总数据来自一项包括164 610名英国生物银行和10 616名瑞典TwinGene受试者的荟萃分析。以方差逆加权(inverse variance weighted, IVW)作为主要方法,MR-Egger和加权中位数2种回归模型作为补充方法进行TSMR分析。采用MR-Egger截距项和MR-多效性残差和异常值(MR-pleiotropy residual sum and outliers, MR-PRESSO)分析检验水平多效性。应用MR-Egger和IVW方法中的Cochrans Q检验评估异质性。采用留一法进行敏感性分析。采用反向TSMR分析验证结果的稳健性。 结果 经Bonferroni法校正的正向TSMR分析结果显示,遗传预测的血清组织蛋白酶E水平升高与较高衰弱指数之间存在因果关系(β=0.033,95%CI:0.015~0.050,P<0.001)。反向TSMR分析结果显示,遗传预测的衰弱指数与各种类型的组织蛋白酶之间不存在因果关系(P>0.05/3)。MR-Egger回归模型截距项检验、MR-PRESSO Global检验和Cochrans Q检验的结果显示,筛选出的单核苷酸多态性(single nucleotide polymorphism, SNP)不存在水平多效性和异质性。基于留一法的敏感度分析结果显示,单一SNP不影响因果关联效应值的稳健性。 结论 在遗传水平上,组织蛋白酶E可作为衰弱易感性的预测性生物标志物,为该疾病的基础和临床研究以及潜在的干预措施提供了新的见解。

关键词: 组织蛋白酶, 衰弱, 孟德尔随机化, 全基因组关联研究

Abstract: Objective To investigate the causal relationship between the nine cathepsins and frailty index at the genetic level using the bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization(TSMR), so as to provide new insights for future prevention and treatment strategies for frailty. Methods Genome-wide association study(GWAS)summary data for nine cathepsins(B, E, F, G, H, L2, O, S, and Z)were obtained from the INTERVAL study, which included 3,301 European participants, and GWAS summary data for frailty index were obtained from the meta-analyses including 164,610 UK Biobank and 10,616 Swedish TwinGene participants. TSMR analysis was conducted using inverse variance weighted(IVW)as the primary method, and two regression models, including MR-Egger and weighted median, as the supplementary. In addition, horizontal pleiotropy was tested using the MR-Egger intercept test and MR-pleiotropy residual sum and outliers(MR-PRESSO)analysis, heterogeneity was assessed by applying Cochrans Q test in MR-Egger and IVW methods, and sensitivity analysis was performed using the “leave-one-out” method. Finally, reverse TSMR analysis was used to verify the robustness of the results. Results The forward TSMR analysis corrected by the Bonferroni method revealed a causal relationship between genetically predicted elevated serum cathepsin E level and higher frailty index(β=0.033, 95%CI:0.015-0.050, P<0.001). The reverse TSMR analysis revealed no causal relationship between genetically predicted frailty index and various types of cathepsins(P>0.05/3). The MR-Egger regression model intercept term test, MR-PRESSO Global test and Cochrans Q test showed that the screened single nucleotide polymorphism(SNP)did not have horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis based on the “leave-one-out” method showed that a single SNP did not affect the robustness of the causal association effect values. Conclusion At the genetic level, cathepsin E could potentially serve as a predictive biomarker for susceptibility to frailty, providing new insights for basic and clinical studies of frailty and possible interventions.

Key words: Cathepsins, Frailty, Mendelian randomization, Genome-wide association study

中图分类号: 

  • R195
[1] Veronese N, Custodero C, Cella A, et al. Prevalence of multidimensional frailty and pre-frailty in older people in different settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Ageing Res Rev, 2021, 72(1): 101498. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101498.
[2] Doody P, Asamane EA, Aunger JA, et al. The prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty among geriatric hospital inpatients and its association with economic prosperity and healthcare expenditure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 467, 779 geriatric hospital inpatients [J]. Ageing Res Rev, 2022, 80(1): 101666. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2022.101666.
[3] Ferriolli E, Fernandes PMP. Frailty syndrome and healthcare for older adults [J]. Sao Paulo Med J, 2024, 142(4): e20241424. doi:10.1590/1516-3180.2024.1424.21052024.
[4] Wang XR, Hu JJ, Wu DP. Risk factors for frailty in older adults [J]. Medicine, 2022, 101(34): e30169. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000030169.
[5] Yadati T, Houben T, Bitorina A, et al. The ins and outs of cathepsins: physiological function and role in disease management [J]. Cells, 2020, 9(7): 1679. doi:10.3390/cells9071679.
[6] Bålsrud P, Ulven SM, Christensen JJ, et al. Inflammatory markers and frailty in home-dwelling elderly, a cross-sectional study [J]. BMC Geriatr, 2024, 24(1): 175. doi:10.1186/s12877-024-04690-2.
[7] Gumpper K, Sermersheim M, Zhu MX, et al. Skeletal muscle lysosomal function via cathepsin activity measurement [J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2019, 1854: 35-43. doi: 10.1007/7651_2017_64.
[8] Wan Y, Piao LM, Xu SN, et al. Cathepsin S activity controls chronic stress-induced muscle atrophy and dysfunction in mice [J]. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2023, 80(9): 254. doi:10.1007/s00018-023-04888-4.
[9] Kim J, McKenna CF, Salvador AF, et al. Cathepsin B and muscular strength are independently associated with cognitive control [J]. Brain Plast, 2022, 8(1): 19-33.
[10] Richmond RC, Davey Smith G. Mendelian randomization: concepts and scope [J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 2022, 12(1): a040501. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a040501.
[11] Skrivankova VW, Richmond RC, Woolf BAR, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using Mendelian randomization: the STROBE-MR statement [J]. JAMA, 2021, 326(16): 1614-1621.
[12] 常鑫, 刘世佳, 韩璐. 服用阿司匹林与子宫内膜癌发病风险的孟德尔随机化关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2023, 61(10): 58-62. CHANG Xin, LIU Shijia, HAN Lu. A Mendelian randomization study of aspirin use and the risk of endometrial cancer [J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2023, 61(10): 58-62.
[13] 吴彤, 杨晶玉, 林盪, 等. 基于孟德尔随机化方法探讨脂质和降脂药物与慢性阻塞性肺病的遗传关联[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2024, 62(5): 54-63. WU Tong, YANG Jingyu, LIN Dang, et al. Genetic association of lipids and lipid-lowering drugs with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on Mendelian randomization [J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Science), 2024, 62(5): 54-63.
[14] Sun BB, Maranville JC, Peters JE, et al. Genomic atlas of the human plasma proteome [J]. Nature, 2018, 558(7708): 73-79.
[15] Atkins JL, Jylhävä J, Pedersen NL, et al. A genome-wide association study of the frailty index highlights brain pathways in ageing [J]. Aging Cell, 2021, 20(9): e13459. doi:10.1111/acel.13459.
[16] Li JL, Tang MB, Gao XL, et al. Mendelian randomization analyses explore the relationship between cathepsins and lung cancer [J]. Commun Biol, 2023, 6(1): 1019.
[17] Kamat MA, Blackshaw JA, Young R, et al. PhenoScanner V2: an expanded tool for searching human genotype-phenotype associations [J]. Bioinformatics, 2019, 35(22): 4851-4853.
[18] Zhao P, Han FY, Liang XY, et al. Causal effects of basal metabolic rate on cardiovascular disease: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study [J]. JAm Heart Assoc, 2024, 13(1): e031447. doi:10.1161/JAHA.123.031447.
[19] Zeng RQ, Zhou ZY, Liao WZ, et al. Genetic insights into the role of cathepsins in cardiovascular diseases: a Mendelian randomization study [J]. ESC Heart Fail, 2024, 11(5): 2707-2718.
[20] Athauda SB, Takahashi T, Inoue H, et al. Proteolytic activity and cleavage specificity of cathepsin E at the physiological pH as examined towards the B chain of oxidized insulin [J]. FEBS Lett, 1991, 292(1-2): 53-56.
[21] Xie Z, Meng J, Kong W, et al. Microglial cathepsin E plays a role in neuroinflammation and amyloid β production in Alzheimers disease [J]. Aging Cell, 2022, 21(3): e13565. doi:10.1111/acel.13565.
[22] Cao WJ, Li MH, Li JX, et al. High expression of cathepsin E is associated with the severity of airflow limitation in patients with COPD [J]. COPD, 2016, 13(2): 160-166.
[23] Kurianiuk A, Socha K, Gacko M, et al. The Relationship between the concentration of cathepsin A, D, and E and the concentration of copper and zinc, and the size of the aneurysmal enlargement in the wall of the abdominal aortic aneurysm [J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2019, 55(1):182-188.
[24] Wan Y, Piao LM, Xu SN, et al. Cathepsin S deficiency improves muscle mass loss and dysfunction via the modulation of protein metabolism in mice under pathological stress conditions [J]. FASEB J, 2023, 37(8): e23086. doi:10.1096/fj.202300395RRR.
[25] Ogasawara S, Cheng X, Inoue A, et al. Cathepsin K activity controls cardiotoxin-induced skeletal muscle repair in mice [J]. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle, 2017, 9: 160-175. doi:10.1002/jcsm.12248.
[26] Celik HI, Koc F, Siyasal K, et al. Exploring the complex associations among risks of malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty in community-dwelling older adults [J]. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act, 2024, 21(1): 18. doi:10.1186/s11556-024-00354-7.
[1] 杨宇凡,李悦,谢灏,林春华. 胆固醇水平与神经源性膀胱风险的因果关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(5): 67-73.
[2] 段盈竹,董波,于睿. 内在情感与类风湿关节炎患者冠状动脉粥样硬化风险关系的孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 63-71.
[3] 赵万霞,詹群璋,金婷,刘玉新,曲崇正,吴剑纯. 基于孟德尔随机化分析肠道菌群、血液代谢物和肥胖的因果关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 72-82.
[4] 吴志晓,赵红洋. 孟德尔随机化分析免疫细胞表型与孤独症谱系障碍的因果关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 83-92.
[5] 陈婵,李巨章,何稳,吴巧珍. 基于两样本孟德尔随机化研究抑郁症和抗抑郁药物靶基因与睡眠呼吸暂停的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 28-36.
[6] 王乐,罗清馨,吴思佳,吴雨桐,葛祎蕾,俞一凡,韦云,吉寒冰,刘铁梅,张紫妍,修佳伟,薛付忠,李洪凯. 虚弱和癫痫关联研究:前瞻性队列和孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 20-30.
[7] 王雪梅,杨豪,宋洋,程世超,张婷婷,王艳春. 抗糖尿病药物与女性恶性肿瘤的因果关联:一项两样本孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 67-77.
[8] 黄馨,王梦雪,付书璠,张琦悦,徐力. 代谢综合征及其组分与消化系统恶性肿瘤的因果关联:两样本孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 86-94.
[9] 李建锋,张展,丁新华,高奋堂,何勤利,谢萍. 欧洲人群饮食因素与认知功能障碍关系的孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 36-43.
[10] 王小磊,方骏,王安,朱武晖,史光军. 两样本孟德尔随机化分析肠道菌群与肝外胆管癌的因果关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 44-50.
[11] 王宝炫,焦杰,张厚君,刘奇,于冠英. 衰弱与肌少症评估在胃肠道肿瘤术后结局预测中的应用与展望[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 51-58.
[12] 常宇,胡云峰,王会丰,郭静,张跳,郝雅琴,刘雨. 阑尾切除术与结直肠癌发病风险关联的孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 77-83.
[13] 杨慧敏,龚万里,侯雅琪,吴静,王洋,贺培凤,于琦. 20种氨基酸与冠心病的因果关联:孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(12): 6-16.
[14] 杜凯豪,侯立朝,东小鸽,薛伟伟,何洁洁,罗兰明慧,蒋威,汪占金,王展. 东亚人肠道菌群与胰腺癌关系:基于孟德尔随机化方法的遗传学证据[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(12): 44-52.
[15] 周坤,刘婷,姜艳菊,胡泽楷,李宇佳,冯武仪,黄继莉,叶汪泉,赵小峰,胡军. 孟德尔随机化分析膝骨关节炎疼痛与肌力的因果关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 61-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!