接受Stupp方案治疗的老年胶质母细胞瘤患者预后的影响因素

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2022.0091

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨接受Stupp方案治疗的老年胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者预后的影响因素。方法分析2014年1月至2018年1月接受Stupp方案治疗的老年GBM患者病例资料,包括一般人口学、临床病例、Karnofsky功能状态(KPS)评分和分子标志物O6-甲基鸟嘌呤DNA甲基转移酶(MGMT)、异柠檬酸脱氢酶-1(IDH-1)、Ki67与TP53的表达等。通过Kaplan-Meier对总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)进行单因素分析,Cox回归模型进行多因素比较。结果共纳入91例样本,49例(53.8%)Ki67≥30%,IDH野生型78例(85.7%),MGMT甲基化35例(38.5%),TP53蛋白阳性44例(48.4%);老年GBM患者1、3、5年OS分别为41.8%、12.8%、9.6%,1、3年PFS分别为16.5%、7.6%;KPS评分(HR=0.445,95%CI:0.265~0.745,P=0.002)、认知功能(HR=2.675,95%CI:1.051~6.089,P=0.039)、MGMT(HR=0.384,95%CI:0.218~0.675, P=0.001)、ki67(HR=1.855,95%CI:1.157~2.975,P=0.010)与老年GBM患者OS有统计学意义的关联性,KPS评分(HR=0.598,95%CI:0.358~0.998,P=0.049)、MGMT(HR=0.335,95%CI:0.187~0.601,P<0.001)、IDH-1(HR=0.437,95%CI:0.200~0.958,P=0.039)、Ki67(HR=1.958,95%CI:1.203~3.187,P=0.007)与GBM患者PFS有统计学意义的关联性。结论老年GBM患者预后差,KPS评分、认知功能、MGMT、IDH-1和Ki67可预测其预后。

关键词: 胶质母细胞瘤, 老年, 预后因素, Stupp方案

Abstract: Objective To investigate the prognostic factors of elderly patients with glioblastoma(GBM)treated with Stupp treatment. Methods Clinical data of elderly GBM patients who received Stupp treatment during Jan. 2014 and Jan. 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, including demographic information, clinical characteristics, Karnofsky Performance Scale(KPS)score, molecular marker O6-methyl guanine DNA methyltransferase(MGMT), isocitrate dehydrogenase 1(IDH-1), expression of ki67 and TP53, and so on. Univariate analysis was performed on overall survival(OS)and progression-free survival(PFS)by Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression model was used for multivariate comparison. Results A total of 91 samples were enrolled, including 49(53.8%)cases of Ki67≥30%, 78(85.7%)cases of IDH wild type, 35(38.5%)cases of MGMT methylation, and 44(48.4%)cases of TP53 protein positive. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS were 41.8 %, 12.8%, and 9.6%, respectively. The 1-year and 3-year PFS were 16.5% and 7.6%, respectively. KPS score(HR=0.445, 95%CI: 0.265-0.745, P=0.002), cognitive function(HR=2.675, 95%CI: 1.051-6.089, P=0.039), MGMT(HR=0.384, 95%CI: 0.218-0.675, P=0.001), Ki67(HR=1.855, 95%CI: 1.157-2.975, P=0.010)were significantly associated with OS. KPS(HR=0.598, 95%CI: 0.358-0.998, P=0.049), MGMT(HR=0.335, 95%CI: 0.187-0.601, P<0.001), IDH-1(HR=0.437, 95%CI: 0.200-0.958, P=0.039), Ki67(HR=1.958, 95%CI: 1.203-3.187, P=0.007)were significantly associated with PFS. Conclusion The prognosis of elderly GBM patients is poor. KPS score, cognitive function, MGMT, IDH-1 and Ki67 can predict the prognosis.

Key words: Glioblastoma, Elderly, Prognosis, Stupp treatment

中图分类号:

R449

时萧寒,李华玉,李峰. 接受Stupp方案治疗的老年胶质母细胞瘤患者预后的影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(10): 42-48.

SHI Xiaohan, LI Huayu, LI Feng. Prognostic factors of elderly patients with glioblastoma treated with Stupp treatment[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2022, 60(10): 42-48.

参考文献

[1] Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 352(10): 987-996.
[2] Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Gittleman H, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2012-2016[J]. Neuro Oncol, 2019, 21(Suppl 5): v1-v100.
[3] Ostrom QT, Kinnersley B, Armstrong G, et al. Age-specific genome-wide association study in glioblastoma identifies increased proportion of ‘lower grade glioma’-like features associated with younger age[J]. Int J Cancer, 2018, 143(10): 2359-2366.
[4] 欧阳辉, 穆林森, 鲁明. 积极治疗老年胶质瘤[C] //第十五届中国医师协会神经外科医师年会摘要集. 深圳: 中国医师协会神经外科医师分会, 2020: 732.
[5] Glaser SM, Dohopolski MJ, Balasubramani GK, et al. Glioblastoma multiforme(GBM)in the elderly: initial treatment strategy and overall survival[J]. J Neurooncol, 2017, 134(1): 107-118.
[6] Alvarez DES, Alvarez-Vega MA, Balbin M, et al. Prognostic factors and survival study in high-grade glioma in the elderly[J]. Br J Neurosurg, 2016, 30(3): 330-336.
[7] Han Q, Liang H, Cheng P, et al. Subtotal resection on survival outcomes in elderly patients with high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Front Oncol, 2020, 10: 151. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00151.
[8] Barbagallo G, Altieri R, Garozzo M, et al. High grade glioma treatment in elderly people: is it different than in younger patients? analysis of surgical management guided by an intraoperative multimodal approach and its impact on clinical outcome[J]. Front Oncol, 2020, 10: 631255. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.631255.
[9] Young JS, Chmura SJ, Wainwright DA, et al. Management of glioblastoma in elderly patients[J]. J Neurol Sci, 2017, 380: 250-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.07.048.
[10] Pirkkalainen JM, Jaaskelainen AS, Halonen P. Retrospective single-center study on elderly patients with glioblastoma between 2014 and 2018 evaluating the effect of age and performance status on survival[J]. Neurooncol Pract, 2022, 9(2): 142-148.
[11] Youland RS, Schomas DA, Brown PD, et al. Patterns of care and treatment outcomes in older adults with low grade glioma: a 50-year experience[J]. J Neurooncol, 2017, 133(2): 339-346.
[12] Laigle-Donadey F, Greffard S. Management of glioblastomas in the elderly population[J]. Rev Neurol(Paris), 2020, 176(9): 724-732.
[13] Ene CI, Cimino PJ, Fine HA, et al. Incorporating genomic signatures into surgical and medical decision-making for elderly glioblastoma patients[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2020, 49(4): E11. doi: 10.3171/2020.7. FOCUS 20418.
[14] Fu C, Li Z, Mao Z. Association between social activities and cognitive function among the elderly in china: a cross-sectional study[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018, 15(2): 231.
[15] Brown PD, Chung C, Liu DD, et al. A prospective phase II randomized trial of proton radiotherapy vs intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma[J]. Neuro Oncol, 2021, 23(8): 1337-1347.
[16] Johnson DR, Sawyer AM, Meyers CA, et al. Early measures of cognitive function predict survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma[J]. Neuro Oncol, 2012, 14(6): 808-816.
[17] Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary[J]. Neuro Oncol, 2021, 23(8): 1231-1251.
[18] Wick W, Weller M, van den Bent M, et al. MGMT testing-the challenges for biomarker-based glioma treatment[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2014, 10(7): 372-385.
[19] Pirozzi CJ, Yan H. The implications of IDH mutations for cancer development and therapy[J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2021, 18(10): 645-661.
[20] Zhao F, Zhang J, Li P, et al. Prognostic value of Ki-67 index in adult medulloblastoma after accounting for molecular subgroup: a retrospective clinical and molecular analysis[J]. J Neurooncol, 2018, 139(2): 333-340.
[21] Kawasoe T, Takeshima H, Yamashita S, et al. Detection of p53 mutations in proliferating vascular cells in glioblastoma multiforme[J]. J Neurosurg, 2015, 122(2): 317-323.
[22] Wang Q, Hu B, Hu X, et al. Tumor evolution of glioma-intrinsic gene expression subtypes associates with immunological changes in the microenvironment[J]. Cancer Cell, 2018, 33(1): 152.
[23] 李培栋, 王新军, 单峤, 等. 脑胶质瘤细胞MGMT甲基化状态与细胞对烷化剂耐药性的关系[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2015, 35(16): 4463-4464.
[24] Kim BS, Kong DS, Seol HJ, et al. MGMT promoter methylation status as a prognostic factor for the outcome of gamma knife radiosurgery for recurrent glioblastoma[J]. J Neurooncol, 2017, 133(3): 615-622.
[25] Eckel-Passow JE, Lachance DH, Molinaro AM, et al. Glioma Groups Based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT Promoter Mutations in Tumors[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(26): 2499-2508.
[26] Louis DN, Giannini C, Capper D, et al. cIMPACT-NOW update 2: diagnostic clarifications for diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant and diffuse astrocytoma/anaplastic astrocytoma, IDH-mutant[J]. Acta Neuropathol, 2018, 135(4): 639-642.
[27] Ceccarelli M, Barthel FP, Malta TM, et al. Molecular profiling reveals biologically discrete subsets and pathways of progression in diffuse glioma[J]. Cell, 2016, 164(3): 550-563.
[28] Luo Y, Zhang X, Mo M, et al. High Ki-67 immunohistochemical reactivity correlates with poor prognosis in bladder carcinoma: a comprehensive meta-analysis with 13,053 patients involved[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2016, 95(15): e3337. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003337.
[29] Petrelli F, Viale G, Cabiddu M, et al. Prognostic value of different cut-off levels of Ki-67 in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64,196 patients[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2015, 153(3): 477-491.
[30] Johannessen AL, Torp SH. The clinical value of Ki-67/MIB-1 labeling index in human astrocytomas[J]. Pathol Oncol Res, 2006, 12(3): 143-147.
[31] Preusser M, Hoeftberger R, Woehrer A, et al. Prognostic value of Ki67 index in anaplastic oligodendroglial tumours-a translational study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor Group[J]. Histopathology, 2012, 60(6): 885-894.

相关文章 15

[1]	逄锦宏,苏萍,乔俊鹏,陈巧巧,陈学禹,赵颖颖,施婕,孙晓茹,李秋春,何蕊言,范轶欧,迟蔚蔚. 老年人群可改变心血管危险因素聚集模式与脑卒中的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 11-19.
[2]	付雨,姜伟,朱高培,薛付忠. 基于多水平模型的山东省老年人健康相关生命质量及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 57-64.
[3]	王宁,郝秀梅,牛翔,黄金明,徐静雅. 中国中老年高血糖、血脂异常、高血压人群健康体检服务利用现状及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 82-91.
[4]	贾魁,李治国,程翠婷,李志娟,刘瑞卿. 银杏叶片联合曲美他嗪治疗老年慢性心力衰竭的效果及机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 19-26.
[5]	刘国伟,翟艳,王薇,吕军城. 潍坊市某城区65岁及以上老年人社会适应能力现状及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 104-110.
[6]	聂秋成,李云峰,田静,刘辛靖,孙丽丽,魏义举. NEDD4样E3泛素蛋白连接酶通过介导果糖二磷酸A的泛素化修饰调控胶质母细胞瘤细胞铁死亡敏感性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 8-17.
[7]	王利红,窦少坤,栾惠,李宝瑞,宗爱珍,徐同成. 多糖在吞咽障碍食品中应用的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(8): 1-8.
[8]	郭艳童,于媛媛,陈莹莹,付雨,张伯韬,袁莹,孙爽爽,赵英淇,朱高培,薛付忠. 山东省主动健康示范区域老年人慢病管理知信行现状及影响机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 98-105.
[9]	宋东玉,吕靖然,李玉丽,刘宇舟. 基于安德森模型的城市中老年人隔代抚养培训需求影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(6): 108-115.
[10]	郭鑫,孟君,郑世良,董秀红. 老年胃癌患者衰弱与人体成分的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 40-47.
[11]	王玉淼,崔晓霈,张红雨. 高龄老年新型冠状病毒肺炎患者应用抗凝治疗的短期疗效和安全性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 21-31.
[12]	姜淑伟,马良,康保絮,王志浩. FRAIL量表在老年关节置换术后压力性损伤风险预测中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 54-66.
[13]	王琼,李欣宇,徐磊,周成超,江帆. 社区听力康复对老年听力障碍患者沟通能力的干预效果评估:一项随机对照试验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 96-104.
[14]	唐宁,黄晓莉,宋桂花. 老年髋部骨折手术患者营养管理研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(10): 42-47.
[15]	刘娜,王娜娜,纪冰,丁雪梅,刘雅鑫,房晓庆,张晓丽. 2012—2021年住院老年患者感染病原菌分布及耐药趋势[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 29-40.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed