您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (1): 45-49.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2017.1025

• • 上一篇    下一篇

国产多西他赛单药治疗晚期乳腺癌的疗效及安全性

律慧敏,张梦玮,牛李敏,曾惠爱,闫敏   

  1. 郑州大学附属肿瘤医院 河南省肿瘤医院乳腺癌诊疗中心, 河南 郑州 450008
  • 发布日期:2022-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 闫敏. E-mail:ym200678@126.com

Efficacy and safety of single-agent domestic docetaxel in the treatment of advanced breast cancer

LÜ Huimin, ZHANG Mengwei, NIU Limin, ZENG Huiai, YAN Min   

  1. Diagnosis and Treatment Center for Breast Cancer, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University &
    Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, Henan, China
  • Published:2022-09-27

摘要: 目的 观察国产多西他赛单药在晚期乳腺癌治疗中的疗效及安全性。 方法 收集141例采用单药多西他赛治疗的晚期乳腺癌患者,每2周期进行疗效评价,回顾性分析单药多西他赛的客观反应率(ORR)、至疾病进展时间(TTP)、至治疗失败时间(TTF)以及安全性,并观察减少地塞米松剂量对患者安全性的影响。 结果 141例均为可评价病例。完成中位6周期(1~14周期)单药多西他赛化疗后,疗效评价为完全缓解(CR)0例、部分缓解(PR)62例、疾病稳定(SD)61例、疾病进展(PD)18例;多西他赛单药治疗ORR为43.0 %(62/141);临床获益率(CBR)为51.8 %(73/141),疾病控制率(DCR)为87.2%(123/141); TTP为6.5个月(5.8~7.2个月), TTF为4.0个月(3.9~4.1个月);3~4级不良反应主要为中性粒细胞减少(72.3%),腹痛腹泻(2.8%)、口腔黏膜炎(4.3%),给予对症处理后均有所改善。同时发现给予地塞米松减量后未增加不良反应。 结论 单药国产多西他赛治疗晚期乳腺癌疗效肯定,耐受性良好,且易于执行,适合晚期乳腺癌的解救治疗。对于不能耐受糖皮质激素不良反应的患者可考虑给予减少地塞米松的使用剂量。

关键词: 国产多西他赛, 晚期乳腺癌, 疗效, 安全性, 化疗

Abstract: Objective To observe the efficacy and toxicities of domestic docetaxel single-agent chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Methods A total of 141 patients with advanced breast cancer treated with domestic docetaxel were reviewed every 2 cycles of treatment. The objective response rate(ORR), time to progress(TTP), time to treatment failure(TTF), toxicity and adverse responses were evaluated. The effects of dexamethasone dosage on the safety of chemotherapy were observed. Results The median number of treatment was 6(1~14)cycles. Of all 141 cases, none were complete remission(CR), 62 were partial remission(PR), 61 were stable disease(SD), and 18 were progression disease(PD). The ORR was 43.0%(62/141), clinical benefit rate(CBR)was 51.8 %(73/141), disease control rate(DCR)was 87.2%(123/141), TTP was 6.5(5.8~7.2)months, and TTF was 4.0(3.9~4.1)months. The grade 3~4 adverse reactions included neutropenia(72.3%), abdominal pain and diarrhea(2.8%)and oral mucositis(4.3%), which were relieved after symptomatic treatment. Reducing the dosage of dexamethasone did not increase adverse reactions. Conclusion Single-agent domestic docetaxel showed good efficacy and safety for patients with advanced breast cancer. The dosage of dexamethasone can be reduced for those who could not tolerate adverse reactions caused by corticosteroid.

Key words: Domestic docetaxel, Advanced breast cancer, Efficacy, Safety, Chemotherapy

中图分类号: 

  • R737.9
[1] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(1): 7-30.
[2] Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group(EBCTCG): Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomized trials[J]. Lancet, 2005, 365(9472): 1687-1717.
[3] Cardoso F, Costa A, Senkus E, et al. 3rd ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer(ABC 3)[J]. Ann Oncol, 2017, 28(1): 16-33.
[4] Carrick S, Parker S, Thornton CE, et al. Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2009, 2(2). Doi:10.1002/14651858.CD-003372 pub3.
[5] Seidman AD, Tiersten A, Hudis C, et al. Phase Ⅱ trial of paclitaxel by 3- hour infusion as initial and salvage chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1995, 13(10): 2575-2581.
[6] Perez EA, Vogel CL, Irwin DH, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2001, 19(22): 4216-4223.
[7] Rd BH. Single-agent docetaxel(Taxotere)in randomized phase III trials[J]. Semin Oncol, 1999, 26(9): 1-6.
[8] Eisenhauer EA,Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline(version 1.1)[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(2): 228-247.
[9] National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.0(CTCAE). Available at: http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm. Accessed June 14, 2011.
[10] Nabholtz JM, Tonkin K, Smylie M, et al. Chemotherapy of breast cancer: are the taxanes going to change the natural history of breast cancer?[J]. Expert Opin Pharmaco, 2000, 1(2): 187-206.
[11] Kelland LR, Abel G. Comparative in vitro cytotoxicity of taxol and Taxotere against cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant human ovarian carcinoma cell lines[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1992, 30(6): 444-450.
[12] Harvey V, Mouridsen H, Semiglazov V, et al. Phase Ⅲ trial comparing three doses of docetaxel for second-1ine treatment of advanced breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(31): 4963-4970.
[13] Figgitt DP, Wiseman LR. Docetaxel: an update of its use in advanced breast cancer[J]. Drugs, 2000, 59(3): 621-651.
[14] 王子平, 孙燕, 张湘茹, 等. 多西他赛治疗晚期乳腺癌的临床研究[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2006, 28(6): 468-470. WANG Ziping, SUN Yan, ZHANG Xiangru, et al. Docetaxel in the treatment of advanced breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Oncology, 2006, 28(6): 468-470.
[15] Marty M, Cognetti F, Maraninchi D, et al. Randomized phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab combined with docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer administered as first-line treatment: the M77001 study group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(19): 4265-4274.
[16] Jones SE, Erban J, Overmoyer B, et al. Randomized phase III study of docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(24): 5542-5551.
[17] Nabholtz JM, Senn HJ, Bezwoda WR, et al. Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus mitomycin plus vinblastine in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1999, 17(5): 1413-1424.
[18] Bonneterre J, Roche H, Monnier A, et al. Docetaxel vs 5-fluorouracil plus vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer after anthracycline therapy failure[J]. Br J Cancer, 2002, 87(11): 1210-1215.
[19] Sjöström J, Blomqvist C, Mouridsen H, et al. Docetaxel compared with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced breast cancer after anthracycline failure: a randomised phase III study with crossover on progression by the Scandinavian Breast Group[J]. Eur J Cancer, 1999, 35(8): 1194-1201.
[20] Brodowicz T, Koestler WJ, Tomek S, et al. Monotherapy with docetaxel in second- or third-line treatment of anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer[J]. Anti-Cancer Drugs, 2000, 11(3): 149-153.
[21] Bergh M, Magnusson K, Nilsson JL, et al. Contact allergenic activity of Tween 80 before and after air exposure[J]. Contact Dermatitis,1997, 37: 9-18.
[22] Semb KA, Aamdal S, Oian P. Capillary protein leak syndrome appears to explain fluid retention in cancer patients who receive docetaxel treatment[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1998, 16(10): 3426-3432.
[23] Schwartz JR. Dexamethasone premedication for prophylaxis of taxane toxicities: can the doses be reduced when paclitaxel or docetaxel are given weekly?[J]. J Oncol Pharm Practice, 2012, 18(2): 250-256.
[24] Chouhan JD, Herrington JD. Single premedication dose of dexamethasone 20 mg IV before docetaxel administration[J]. J Oncol Pharm Practice, 2010, 17(3): 155-159.
[25] 李海志, 徐沁甜, 宋毕清. 单次剂量地塞米松10 mg静注预防多西他赛副反应的安全性与可行性研究[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2016, 18(8): 63-64.
[1] 王兴山,张浩天,张云峰,周一新. 旋转铰链膝在复杂初次膝关节置换中的应用及临床疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 51-57.
[2] 罗淇,王霞,姜孟. 脑功能网络分析在失语症诊疗中的应用:病理机制分析、临床诊断与疗效评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(8): 111-126.
[3] 苗壮,刘培来. 双柱活动平台单髁假体治疗膝关节前内侧骨关节炎的中期疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 62-67.
[4] 国科,陈绪军,郑宝石,施超,黄克力,曹勇,陈军,吴东凯,张晓慎,罗俊辉,申林,莫绪明,杨岷,王晓武,雷印胜,田茂州,王振东,孟自力,孙忠东,李有金,陆辉辉,孟春营,高峰,陈黔苏,郭能瑞,柳德斌,张楠,林宇,陈文生,宋保国,方智,王海晨,廖晓波,徐朝军. 快通道拔管在全动脉冠脉旁路移植术的多中心临床效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 26-32.
[5] 王建旭,彭晓辉,丰浩田,安森博,董恣豪,黄子帅,刘喆,杨光. 应用内支撑技术辅助膝关节前交叉韧带全内重建术近期疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 22-27.
[6] 贾振存,吴晨睿,赵德龙,朱可嘉,丁森泰. 八宝丹胶囊联合米拉贝隆治疗女性膀胱过度活动症的有效性与安全性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(10): 72-79.
[7] 李永,崔书君,杨飞,张凡,殷晓霞. 基于增强MRI的亚区域影像组学模型可预测乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后的病理完全反应[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 81-89.
[8] 孙晓丹,杨创. 多黏菌素B治疗ICU耐碳青霉烯类革兰阴性杆菌感染患者的效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 72-77.
[9] 张荣雨,赵文,李洪欣,杨闯,王健,韩春燕,李际盛. 奥西替尼联合化疗一线治疗EGFR-RAD51融合突变转移性肺腺癌1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 116-120.
[10] 冯绪强,高萍,孙超,陶琳,闫根全,冷冰. 替加环素治疗感染性疾病临床疗效及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 11-20.
[11] 林晓倩,封茂燕,牟正. 二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂的药学特点及临床应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 43-48.
[12] 吴磊丽,蔡华丽,孙德胜,魏蔚霞. 超声引导穿刺硬化术联合地诺孕素治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿的疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 65-69.
[13] 邵长秀,贺青卿,庄晓璇,周鹏,李小磊,岳涛,徐婧,李陈钰,郭浩男,庄大勇. 甲状旁腺全切加微量腺体自体移植术治疗109例肾性继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进的长期疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(4): 42-48.
[14] 杨晓斐,韩波,姜殿东,吕建利,伊迎春,张建军,赵立健,王静,王艳,袁辉. 经导管射频消融术治疗儿童快速性心律失常972例临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 49-56.
[15] 钱明,姜雷,王学建,赵伟,汪志峰,张毅. 神经内镜与钻孔引流治疗大量慢性硬膜下血肿的疗效及安全性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(12): 94-99.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!