您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (11): 81-84.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2019.1435

• • 上一篇    下一篇

122例哮喘患者舒张试验结果分析

李岩,牛瑞,王超超   

  1. 山东大学第二医院呼吸内科, 山东 济南 250033
  • 发布日期:2020-11-04
  • 通讯作者: 王超超. E-mail:wcc8587@126.com

Analysis of the bronchodilator test of 122 patients with asthma

LI Yan, NIU Rui, WANG Chaochao   

  1. Department of Respiratory, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China
  • Published:2020-11-04

摘要: 目的 分析哮喘患者肺功能和支气管舒张试验结果及特点,探讨肺功能检查对哮喘诊断、疗效判断的价值。 方法 收集2018年入住山东大学第二医院呼吸内科、确诊为哮喘患者的肺功能检查资料,共计122例,根据FEV1/FVC%分为肺功能正常组(30例)及气流受限组(92例),其中气流受限组根据一秒量FEV1分为3个亚组(轻度组63例、中重度组16例、重度组13例),分析各组肺功能及舒张试验数据。 结果 正常组、轻度组、中重度组、重度组支气管舒张试验阳性率分别为16.7%、58.7%、81.3%、100.0%,组间差异有统计学意义(χ2=35.8, P=0.001);在正常组,FEV1和FVC的改善量、改善率差异无统计学意义(P=0.39, P=0.14);在气流受限组,中重度组及重度组一秒率试验前、试验后数值低于轻度组,差异有统计学意义(试验前:χ2=52.16, P<0.001;试验后2=49.49, P<0.001);各组的试验后一秒率均较试验前升高,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05);舒张试验后,解除气流受限者仅占9.8%,且均为轻度组。 结论 哮喘患者支气管舒张试验结果提示,随阻塞程度加重,呈现阳性率渐增趋势。肺功能正常也可行舒张试验,阳性病例呈特殊流速-容量环表现。哮喘治疗与控制是终生的、个体化的,定期复查肺功能,有助于指导临床治疗及全程哮喘管理。

关键词: 肺功能测定, 支气管舒张试验, 哮喘, 一秒量, 一秒率

Abstract: Objective To analyze the results and characteristics of pulmonary function test and bronchodilator test in patients with asthma, and to explore the value of pulmonary function test in diagnosis and curative effect of asthma. Methods Pulmonary function results of 122 patients with asthma in 2018 were collected. According to FEV1/FVC%, the cases were divided into normal group(n=30)and airflow restricted group(n=92). Airflow restricted group was further divided into mild group(n=63), moderately severe group(n=16)and severe group(n=13)based on FEV1. Then the data of different groups were analyzed. Results The positive rates of bronchodilator test were 16.7%, 58.7%, 81.3%, and 100.0% in normal group, mild group, moderately severe group, and severe group, respectively, with a statistical difference between different groups(χ2=35.8, P=0.001). There was no significant difference of improvement quantity and improvement rate between FEV1 and FVC in normal group(P=0.39, P=0.14). FEV1/FVC% values before and after bronchodilator test in moderately severe group and severe group were lower than that in mild group(before the test: χ2=52.16, P<0.001; after the test: χ2=49.49, P<0.001). FEV1/FVC% value was increased after bronchodilator test in all airflow restricted groups(all P<0.05). Only 9.8% of patients were released from air restriction after bronchodilator test, which were entirely from mild group. Conclusion Positive rate of bronchodilator test increases depending on the aggravation of airflow obstruction in patients with asthma. The patients with normal pulmonary function can also reveive the bronchodilator test. Specific flow volume loops are showed in positive cases of normal group. It is a lifelong process and needs individualized management in the control or treatment of asthma. Pulmonary function test examined regularly is beneficial to guide clinical treatment and manage asthma.

Key words: Pulmonary function test, Bronchodilator test, Asthma, Forced expiratory volume in one second, Forced expiratory volume in one second /forced vital capacity

中图分类号: 

  • R562.2+5
[1] Boulet LP, Reddel HK, Bateman E, et al. The Global Initiative for Asthma(GINA): 25 years later[J]. Eur Respir J, 2019, 54(2): 1900598. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00598-2019.
[2] 尹硕淼,陈远彬,郑燕婵,等.不同肺功能检查方式在支气管哮喘指南中的诊断价值比较[J].中国全科医学, 2018, 21(32): 3911-3914. YIN Shuomiao, CHEN Yuanbin, ZHENG Yanchan, et al. Comparison of diagnostic value in different pulmonary function tests in the guidelines of bronchial asthma[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2018, 21(32): 3911-3914.
[3] Osborne ML, Pedula KL, O'Hollaren M, et al. Assessing future need for acute care in adult asthmatics: the Profile of Asthma Risk Study: a prospective health maintenance organization-based study[J]. Chest, 2007, 132(4): 1151-1161.
[4] 中国呼吸医师协会肺功能与临床呼吸生理工作委员会, 中华医学会呼吸病学分会呼吸治疗学组. 肺功能检查报告规范——肺量计检查、支气管舒张试验、支气管激发试验[J].中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(22):1681-1691.
[5] Wanger J, Clausen JL, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes[J]. Eur Respir J, 2005, 26(3): 511-522.
[6] Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. Standardisation of spirometry[J]. Eur Respir J, 2005, 26(2): 319-338.
[7] Becker AB, Abrams EM. Asthma guidelines: the Global Initiative for Asthma in relation to national guidelines[J]. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol, 2017, 17(2): 99-103.
[8] Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests[J]. Eur Respir J, 2005, 26(5): 948-968.
[9] 陈桂芝,戚良燕,邓淑仙,等.慢性持续期支气管哮喘患者焦虑、抑郁变化趋势的研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2015, 25(31): 40-43. CHEN Guizhi, QI Liangyan, DENG Shuxian, et al. Research on the trend of anxiety and depression of patients with asthma in chromic duration[J]. China Journal of Modern Medicine, 2015, 25(31): 40-43.
[10] 刘泽英,刘双,朱晨曦,等.支气管哮喘患者支气管舒张试验指标与疗效关系的研究[J].心肺血管病杂志, 2013, 32(5): 569-572. LIU Zeying, LIU Shuang, ZHU Chenxi, et al. Study on the relationship between the bronchial relaxation test index and the curative effects in patients with bronchial asthma[J]. Journal of Cardiovascular & Pulmonary Diseases, 2013, 32(5): 569-572.
[11] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会哮喘学组.支气管哮喘患者自我管理中国专家共识[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2018, 41(3): 171-178.
[12] 邢斌,林江涛,唐华平,等.我国城区支气管哮喘急性发作住院患者治疗情况的调查分析[J].中华医学杂志, 2018, 98(8): 622-626. XING Bin, LIN Jiangtao, TANG Huaping, et al. A restrospective study of the treatment of patients hospitalized for asthma exacerbation in China[J]. National Medical Journan of China, 2018, 98(8): 622-626.
[13] 林江涛,王文巧,周新,等.我国十城市支气管哮喘控制和疾病管理及患者认知水平的变化[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2018, 41(3): 191-195. LIN Jiangtao, WANG Wenqiao, ZHOU Xin, et al. Trends of asthma control, disease management and perception in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 2018, 41(3): 191-195.
[14] Reddel HK, Bateman ED, Becker A, et al. A summary of the new GINA strategy: a roadmap to asthma control[J]. Eur Respir J, 2015, 46(3): 622-639.
[15] Boulet LP, FitzGerald JM, Reddel HK. The revised 2014 GINA strategy report: opportunities for change[J]. Curr Opin Pulm Med, 2015, 21(1): 1-7.
[16] 黄传君,赵方正,陈方方,等.吸入性糖皮质激素能有效控制支气管哮喘气道炎症[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2018,41(11): 912.
[17] 蔡绍曦,赵海金.重症哮喘的个体化治疗现状和展望[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2017, 40(11): 806-808.
[18] 刘光辉.支气管哮喘的规范化诊疗[J].医学与哲学, 2015, 36(14): 22-26. LIU Guanghui. Standardized diagnosis and treatment of bronchial asthma[J]. Medicine and Philosophy, 2015, 36(14): 22-26.
[19] 王刚,张欣,王蕾,等.轻度支气管哮喘治疗策略的商榷[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2018, 41(7): 572-576.
[20] 卢慧宇,徐虹,张亚明,等.雾化吸入糖皮质激素在哮喘急性发作的应用相关问题探讨[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2015, 38(2): 158-160.
[21] 沈华浩,杜旭菲,应颂敏.新版中国支气管哮喘防治指南与全球支气管哮喘防治创议的异同[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2018, 41(3): 166-168.
[22] 中华医学会变态反应分会呼吸过敏学组(筹),中华医学会呼吸病学分会哮喘学组.中国过敏性哮喘诊治指南[J].中华内科杂志, 2019, 58(9): 636-655.
[23] 王远征.支气管激发试验伴发晕厥1例报告[J].江西医学院学报, 2008, 48(6): 55.
[24] 张齐武,许苏 丹,李 虹.组胺气道激发试验致严重呼吸困难 3例[J].临床肺科杂志, 2008, 13(9): 1201.
[25] 许圣慧,关继涛,高耐芬,等.成人支气管哮喘自我管理[J].国际呼吸杂志, 2017, 37(5): 383-386. XU Shenghui, GUAN Jitao, GAO Naifen, et al. Self-management of bronchial asthma in adults[J]. International Journal of Respiration, 2017, 37(5): 383-386.
[1] 张秋萍,朱慧志,吕川,夏咏琪,张秀. 基于生物信息学分析鉴定哮喘潜在的关键自噬和铁死亡相关基因[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 74-87.
[2] 张政,王建伟,杨玉娟,张宇,宋西成. 哮喘儿童2008及2019年免疫球蛋白E变化及相关危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 32-36.
[3] 曹洛菲,王珊珊,王金荣,姜荷云,苗瑜,马光增. 哮喘发作期FeNO升高儿童肺功能舒张试验的特点分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 38-44.
[4] 孙丛丛,崔文静,张锦涛,张东,刘晓菲,潘云,亓倩,徐嘉蔚,曾荣,郭红喜,董亮. 铁死亡在支气管哮喘气道重塑中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 1-9.
[5] 王静,刘晓菲,曾荣,许长娟,张锦涛,董亮. 基于机器学习算法鉴定哮喘的坏死性凋亡相关生物标志物[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 21-32.
[6] 闫金燕,杨春,李雷,吴福玲,焦永莉,张晓蔚,李晶,张瑞珍,王磊,马香. 山东省儿童百日咳感染与哮喘的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 33-41.
[7] 张锦涛,董亮. 气道上皮及其源性细胞因子与哮喘:思考与展望[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 1-6.
[8] 丁伊人,刘婉莹,姚蕾,姚欣. 大环内酯类抗生素治疗哮喘的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 21-27.
[9] 王婷,张丽,王刚. 神经心理性哮喘[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 28-34.
[10] 徐芳,田国雄,孙倍倍,陈馨怡,陈高莹,张睿琦,应颂敏,吴妙莲,张超,吴优倩. 重度哮喘的生物与细胞疗法研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 35-42.
[11] 石硕川,曾荣,张锦涛,张东,潘云,刘晓菲,许长娟,王莹,董亮. 基于生物信息学探索支气管哮喘中的潜在差异免疫基因和免疫浸润特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 43-53.
[12] 徐新军,邵丽婷,陈颖,刘会芳,杨玉娟,张宇,王浛睿,宋西成. SYN008与Xolair®对过敏性哮喘小鼠治疗作用效果比较:炎症与重塑[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 1-10.
[13] 浩妍,崔丽梅,陈颖,杨玉娟,宋西成. 代谢组学在气道炎症性疾病中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 117-124.
[14] 步美玲,王金荣,冯梅,孙立锋. FOXM1在呼吸道病毒感染致哮喘小鼠急性发作中的机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 1-9.
[15] 张倩,秦明明,何学佳,蔡秋景,张亚民,李庆苏,朱薇薇. 骨化三醇对哮喘中TGF-β1所诱导上皮间充质转化的调控作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 10-18.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!