您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (8): 44-48.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.153

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用Enterprise支架治疗动脉粥样硬化性椎-基底动脉狭窄的探讨

王小飞, 王成伟, 王志刚, 丁璇, 王敏卿   

  1. 山东大学第二医院神经外科, 山东 济南 250033
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-05 发布日期:2015-08-10
  • 通讯作者: 王成伟.E-mail:15106983331@163.com E-mail:15106983331@163.com

Application of enterprise stent in atherosclerotic vertebral-basilar arterial stenosis

WANG Xiaofei, WANG Chengwei, WANG Zhigang, DING Xuan, WANG Minqing   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-02-05 Published:2015-08-10

摘要: 目的 探讨应用Enterprise支架治疗动脉粥样硬化性椎-基底动脉狭窄的安全性和有效性.方法 回顾性分析2012年1月至2014年6月山东大学第二医院神经外科应用Enterprise支架治疗动脉粥样硬化性椎-基底动脉狭窄患者46例,患者术前至少提前3 d服用氯吡格雷(75 mg/d)和阿司匹林(300 mg/d)联合抗血小板治疗.记录患者各项临床指标,并于术后1、3、6、12个月进行临床及脑血管造影随访.结果 46例患者共计48处狭窄病变.其中男33例(71.7%),女13例(28.3%).病变位于基底动脉28处(58.3%),左侧椎动脉15处(31.3%),右侧椎动脉5处(10.4%).病变血管狭窄程度50%~70%共6处(33.3%),70%~99%共32处(66.7%).手术成功率100%.围手术期并发症4例(8.7%).术后6个月,35处病变获得造影随访,其中术后支架内再狭窄5例(14.3%).随访期发生与病变血管供血区一致的缺血事件5例(10.9%).结论 应用Enterprise支架治疗动脉粥样硬化性椎-基底动脉狭窄安全有效,技术成功率高,并发症发生率较低.

关键词: 颅内支架, 介入治疗, 动脉粥样硬化, 狭窄, 椎-基底动脉

Abstract: Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of enterprise stent in the treatment of atherosclerotic vertebral-basilar arterial stenosis. Methods A retrospective study was performed in patients who received enterprise stent in the Department of Neurosurgery, Second Hospital of Shandong University during Jan. 2012 and June 2014. Patients were prescribed with medication of clopidogrel 75 mg/d and aspirin 300 mg/d at least 3 days preoperatively. The observation indexes, clinical follow-ups and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) performed in month 1, 3, 6 and 12 postoperatively were collected and reviewed. Results Of the 46 patients with 48 lesions, 33 (71.7%) were men and 13 (28.3%) were women, 28 lesions (58.3%) were at the basilar artery, 15 (31.3%) were at the left vertebral artery, and 5 (10.4%) were at the right vertebral artery. The technical success rate was 100%. Altogether 4 patients (8.7%) developed perioperative complications. DSA examination of 35 lesions 6 months postoperatively showed 5 cases (14.3%) had postoperative restenoses. And 5 (10.9%) ischemic events occurred during the follow-up. Conclusion Application of enterprise stent is safe and efficacious, with high technical success rate and low perioperative complication rate.

Key words: Enterprise stent, Vertebral-basilar artery, Stenosis, Atherosclerosis, Interventional therapy

中图分类号: 

  • R651.1
[1] Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, et al. Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial[J]. Lancet, 2014, 383(9914): 333-341.
[2] Peng T, Qian Z, Liu A, et al. Progressive occlusion of enterprise stent-assisted coiling of ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms and related factors on angiographic follow-up: a single-center experience with 468 patients[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(3): 92407.
[3] Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, et al. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 352(13): 1305-1316.
[4] Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial. The EC/IC Bypass Study Group[J]. N Engl J Med, 1985, 313(19): 1191-1200.
[5] Bose A, Hartmann M, Henkes H, et al. A novel, self-expanding, nitinol stent in medically refractory intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses: the Wingspan study[J]. Stroke, 2007, 38(5): 1531-1537.
[6] Vajda Z, Schmid E, Guthe T, et al. The modified Bose method for the endovascular treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic arterial stenoses using the Enterprise stent[J]. Neurosurgery, 2012, 70(1): 91-101.
[7] Mori T, Fukuoka M, Kazita K, et al. Follow-up study after intracranial percutaneous transluminal cerebral balloon angioplasty[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,1998,19(8): 1525-1533.
[8] Jiang WJ, Wang YJ, Du B, et al. Stenting of symptomatic M1 stenosis of middle cerebral artery: an initial experience of 40 patients[J]. Stroke, 2004, 35(6): 1375-1380.
[9] Park S, Kim JH, Kwak JK, et al. Intracranial stenting for severe symptomatic stenosis: self-expandable versus balloon-expandable stents[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2013, 19(3): 276-282.
[10] Kurre W, Berkefeld J, Brassel F, et al. In-hospital complication rates after stent treatment of 388 symptomatic intracranial stenoses: results from the INTRASTENT multicentric registry[J]. Stroke, 2010, 41(3): 494-498.
[11] Krischek O, Miloslavski E, Fischer S, et al. A comparison of functional and physical properties of self-expanding intracranial stents[Neuroform3, Wingspan, Solitaire, Leo+, Enterprise][J]. Minim Invasive Neurosurg, 2011, 54(1): 21-28.
[12] Turk AS, Levy EI, Albuquerque FC, et al. Influence of patient age and stenosis location on wingspan in-stent restenosis[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2008, 29(1): 23-27.
[13] Zaidat OO, Klucznik R, Alexander MJ, et al. The NIH registry on use of the Wingspan stent for symptomatic 70-99% intracranial arterial stenosis[J]. Neurology, 2008, 70(17): 1518-1524.
[14] Yue X, Xi G, Lu T, et al. Influence of residual stenosis on clinical outcome and restenosis after middle cerebral artery stenting[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2011, 34(4): 744-750.
[15] Shin YS, Kim BM, Suh SH, et al. Wingspan stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: clinical outcomes and risk factors for in-stent restenosis[J]. Neurosurgery, 2013, 72(4): 596-604.
[1] 孙红林,管玉强,于培儒,李磊,杜庆霞,丁浩. 支架植入治疗儿童主动脉缩窄并高血压的可行性及近中期疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 58-62.
[2] 段盈竹,董波,于睿. 内在情感与类风湿关节炎患者冠状动脉粥样硬化风险关系的孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 63-71.
[3] 李习平,邱梅,黄瑞峰,林慧慧,刘丝丝,罗鸿莹,王宇月,王敏,杨晓彤. 基于脂质沉积抑制-代谢清除协同效应的黄连素抗动脉粥样硬化机制研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 77-83.
[4] 胡冰涛,张文灿,王崇怡,林翔宇,王凯斌,冯运泽,刘郴,徐万龙,李乐,司海朋. 基于加速康复外科理念的单孔分体内镜微创技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床效果分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 1-7.
[5] 杜艾家,张曼,陈鹤,王丽新,尚应殊. 微小RNA-1270靶向调控血管生成素样蛋白7抑制巨噬细胞炎症和脂质蓄积[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 1-9.
[6] 侯晓慧,Arezou Bikdeli,马超,李大庆. 250例NSTE-ACS患者ACE、KLK1及PTGIS基因型联合相关性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 10-20.
[7] 程震宇,来庆国,吴梦涛. 髂股静脉支架置入术后再狭窄的影响因素研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(12): 112-117.
[8] 刘淋,王晓楠,杨雅溪,王江腾,李旭,周新丽,管庆波,张栩. 甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(8): 93-100.
[9] 何兰兰,杨轲,任万军,王小平. 经颈部静脉旁路术治疗锁骨下静脉闭塞所致透析内瘘失功[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(6): 91-95.
[10] 尹心怡,李观强,张喜成. 髂静脉病变支架植入术后支架内再狭窄的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 8-13.
[11] 黄书苑,于鑫鑫,杨宝珠,王锡明. 自动软件在经导管主动脉瓣置换术前评估中的价值:与手动测量的对比研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 22-31.
[12] 曲永强,赵泽宇,吴兴原,韩玮,段瑞生,李衍滨,李亨. 颈动脉分叉处支架置入术后严重持续性低血压的危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 78-82.
[13] 崔婷婷,王丽,许耀,王浩,徐兴晟,孟庆峰. 经导管主动脉瓣置换术后合并Kounis综合征及HIT 1例报道[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 109-112.
[14] 王少虎,牟鑫,许程飞,赵颖馨,张华. 老年人颈动脉狭窄与脑白质结构网络拓扑属性的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 72-77.
[15] 许天旗,常娜,张帅,李莎,矫秉轩,于鑫鑫,王锡明. 非酒精性脂肪肝识别基于CTA颈动脉高危斑块[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(12): 36-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!