您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版)

• 医学心理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

艾司西酞普兰与文拉法辛对抑郁症患者社会功能影响的比较

李芹1,焦志安2 ,赵国庆2,高进2   

  1. 1. 山东大学医学院, 山东 济南 250012;  2. 山东大学附属省立医院临床心理科, 山东 济南 250021
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-21 出版日期:2014-05-10 发布日期:2014-05-10
  • 通讯作者: 焦志安 E-mail:jiaozhian@126.com

Comparison of the effects between escitalopram and venlafaxine on the social function in patients with depression

LI Qin1, JIAO Zhi'an2, ZHAO Guoqing2, GAO Jin2   

  1. 1. School of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012,  Shandong,China;
    2. Department of Clinical Psychology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University,
    Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Received:2013-10-21 Online:2014-05-10 Published:2014-05-10

摘要: 目的  比较艾司西酞普兰与文拉法辛对抑郁症患者社会功能的影响。方法  将符合抑郁症诊断标准的100例患者随机分为两组,分别给予艾司西酞普兰和文拉法辛进行治疗,采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)评价疗效,席汉残疾量表(SDS)和健康状况调查问卷(SF-36)评价患者社会功能改善情况,不良反应量表(TESS)评定不良反应严重程度。结果  两组间不同时间HAMD评分无统计学差异(P>0.05),但是均低于治疗前(P<0.01)。治疗8周末,两组间有效率和治愈率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组SDS总分、SF-36社会功能因子分8周末与基线比较差异均有统计学意义 (P<0.01),两组间SDS总分、SF-36社会功能因子分在治疗前及治疗8周末比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论  艾司西酞普兰与文拉法辛均能较好地改善抑郁症患者的社会功能,且差异无统计学意义。

关键词: 社会功能, 抑郁症, 艾司西酞普兰, 文拉法辛

Abstract: Objective  To compare the effects of escitalopram and venlafaxine on the social function in patients with depression. Methods  A total of 100 patients who met the diagnostic criteria of depression were randomly divided into two groups and treated with escitalopram and venlafaxine respectively. The therapeutic efficacy was measured with Hamilton depression scale (HAMD-17); the improvement of social function was measured with Sheehan disability scale (SDS) and the short form-36 health survey (SF-36). The side effects were evaluated by the treatment emergent symptom scale (TESS). Results  There were no significant differences in the HAMD scores between the two groups at each interview time (P>0.05), but the scores of HAMD in both groups decreased significantly compared with the baseline (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in the effective rate and remission rate after 8 weeks of treatment between the two groups (P>0.05). There were marked differences in scores of SDS and social functions factor scores of SF-36 at the end of the 8th week and the baseline in both groups (P<0.01), but no significant differences before treatment and after 8 weeks of therapy (P>0.05). Conclusion  Both escitalopram and venlafaxine can effectively improve the social function in patients with depression, with no statistically significant differences between them.

Key words: Venlafaxine, Depression, Social function, Escitalopram

中图分类号: 

  • R749.5
[1] 陈婵,李巨章,何稳,吴巧珍. 基于两样本孟德尔随机化研究抑郁症和抗抑郁药物靶基因与睡眠呼吸暂停的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 28-36.
[2] 曹丹凤,李慧. 儿童期不良经历对妊娠期抑郁症状的影响:母胎依恋的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 87-91.
[3] 王新起,徐晶晶,许旺旺,张洋,高进. 25(OH)D、IGF-I及焦虑、抑郁症状与门诊青少年精神障碍患者非自杀性自伤的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 59-64.
[4] 韩梅,孟维静,陶子琨,杨希,徐雅琪,穆华夏,卜伟晓,王素珍,石福艳. 基于G-计算的高血压、抑郁在2型糖尿病与认知功能之间的因果多中介分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(10): 101-108.
[5] 曹丹凤,刘宗花,王君芝,张国翔. 女性儿童期家庭功能障碍对成年后妊娠期抑郁症状的独立和累积作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(6): 97-101.
[6] 孙富云,王维鹏,张会会,耿艳,安小霞,李双双,张彬彬. 结直肠癌术后患者人格特质与抑郁、焦虑症状的关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 91-96.
[7] 吕岩,于潇,蔺新英,赵琦,王保珍. 聊城市老年女性膳食模式与抑郁症状的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(11): 103-108.
[8] 王颖,杨蓓,王娟,李艳艳,曹枫林. 累积儿童期逆境对护士抑郁症状的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(11): 83-89.
[9] 王丹,杨晓华,郑云哨,阚伟京,寻广磊. 抑郁症患者血清hs-CRP水平变化及其对抗抑郁药疗效的预测作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(6): 51-57.
[10] 刘沛, 刘丹, 陈志刚. 中药养心清郁汤联合黛力新治疗糖尿病合并抑郁症的临床观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(S1): 59-60.
[11] 张雅杰, 高晓林, 高晓秋. 盐酸文拉法辛联合心理干预治疗2型糖尿病患者抑郁症的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(S1): 130-131.
[12] 魏倩倩1, 焦志安2,高进2,赵国庆2. 焦虑症状对抑郁症治疗效果的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(9): 113-117.
[13] 纪孝伟1,2,毕建忠1. 卒中后抑郁大鼠脑内FGF-2表达的研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(9): 30-.
[14] 徐晓明,李秋玲,那全,崔红,刘彩霞. 娠期抑郁症对大鼠中缝核色氨酸羟化酶2表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(9): 37-40.
[15] 王学峰1,宋晓1,谭兰2. 伴与不伴精神病性症状重度抑郁症的临床对照研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(9): 117-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!