您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (10): 89-97.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.1436

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

反复种植失败患者焦虑抑郁症状与情绪调节策略的相关性研究

孙利静1,孟月茹1,张召义1,刘蕾1,马丽瑾1,房鹛1,2   

  1. 1.山东大学妇儿与生殖健康研究院/山东大学附属生殖医院, 山东 济南 250012;2.山东第一医科大学附属省立医院生殖医学中心, 山东 济南 250021
  • 发布日期:2025-10-17
  • 通讯作者: 房鹛. E-mail:fangmei@sduivf.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省医药卫生科技发展计划(202214050188;202418000802)

Emotion regulation strategies and psychological distress in recurrent implantation failure patients: a correlational study

SUN Lijing1, MENG Yueru1, ZHANG Zhaoyi1, LIU Lei1, MA Lijin1, FANG Mei1,2   

  1. 1. The Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health / Reproductive Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Published:2025-10-17

摘要: 目的 探讨反复种植失败患者的焦虑、抑郁症状及其与情绪调节策略(认知重评、表达抑制、反刍)的相关性。 方法 选取2023年5月5日至2024年11月2日就诊于某三甲生殖专科医院反复种植失败患者300例,采用一般情况调查表、广泛焦虑量表(Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 items, GAD-7)、患者健康问卷(Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items, PHQ-9)、情绪调节问卷(Emotion Regulation Question-naire, ERQ)、反刍思维反应量表(Ruminative Responses Scale, RRS)进行评估和调查。采用优势分析比较情绪调节策略与PHQ-9得分的相关性。 结果 反复种植失败患者抑郁评分为5.00(2.00,9.00),焦虑评分为5.00(1.00,7.00),抑郁症状检出率为52.33%,焦虑症状检出率为51.00%。PHQ-9得分在工作情况及婚姻状况方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),GAD-7得分在患者备孕胎次方面差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。线性回归分析结果表明,反刍和表达抑制与PHQ-9得分正相关(β=0.298,P<0.001; β=0.091,P=0.045),认知重评与PHQ-9得分负相关(β=-0.123,P=0.001),反刍与GAD-7得分正相关(β=0.284,P<0.001);进一步的优势分析显示,反刍、认知重评和表达抑制分别解释抑郁症状93.30%、5.03%和1.84%的方差。 结论 反复种植失败患者在临床上表现出明显的焦虑、抑郁症状。反刍是导致这两种症状的主要风险因素,认知重评是抑郁症状的保护因素。

关键词: 反复种植失败, 抑郁, 焦虑, 情绪调节策略, 优势分析

Abstract: Objective To investigate the prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with recurrent implantation failure(RIF)and analyze their associations with emotion regulation strategies(cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, rumination). Methods This prospective study enrolled 300 consecutive RIF patients from a tertiary reproductive medicine center(form May 5, 2023 to November 2, 2024). Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were collected through a structured survey. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale(GAD-7)and the Patient Health Questionnaire(PHQ-9)were utilised to evaluate patients anxiety and depression symptoms, respectively. The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire(ERQ)and the Ruminative Response Scale(RRS)were utilised to evaluate three emotion regulation strategies: cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, and rumination. Dominance analysis was employed to quantify the relative contributions of emotion regulation strategies to depressive symptoms. Results Patients with recurrent implantation failure had depression scores ranging from 2.00 to 9.00 and anxiety scores from 1.00 to 7.00. The prevalence of depression symptoms was 52.33% and the prevalence of anxiety symptoms was 51.00%. A statistically significant difference was observed in the PHQ-9 scores in relation to work and marital status(P<0.05), and a statistically significant difference was identified in the GAD-7 scores in relation to parity(P<0.05). The findings of the linear regression analysis demonstrated that rumination and expression inhibition exhibited a positive correlation with the PHQ-9 scores(β=0.298,P<0.001; β=0.091,P=0.045), while cognitive reappraisal demonstrated a negative correlation with the PHQ-9 scores(β=-0.123,P=0.001). Additionally, rumination exhibited a positive correlation with the GAD-7 scores(β=0.284,P<0.001). Dominance analysis identified rumination(93.30%), cognitive reappraisal(5.03%), and expressive suppression(1.84%)as key predictors of depressive symptoms. Conclusion RIF patients demonstrate clinically significant anxiety and depression burden. Rumination is the predominant risk factor for both conditions, while cognitive reappraisal serves as a protective mechanism against depression.

Key words: Recurrent implantation failure, Depression, Anxiety, Emotional regulation strategies, Dominance analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R471
[1] 中国医师协会生殖医学专业委员会, 中国女医师协会生殖医学专业委员会. 反复种植失败临床诊治中国专家共识 [J]. 中华医学杂志, 2023, 103(2): 89-100.
[2] Busnelli A, Reschini M, Cardellicchio L, et al. How common is real repeated implantation failure? An indirect estimate of the prevalence[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2020, 40(1): 91-97.
[3] Mak JSM, Chung CHS, Chung JPW, et al. The effect of endometrial scratch on natural-cycle cryopreserved embryo transfer outcomes: a randomized controlled study[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2017, 35(1): 28-36.
[4] 朱浩彬, 胡佩诚, 乔杰. 初次与重复接受体外受精胚胎移植治疗患者心理应激的对比研究[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2010, 39(11): 52-56. ZHU Haobin, HU Peicheng, QIAO Jie. A comparative study of psychological stress in veterans and inductees women undergoing IVF-ET treatment[J]. Journal of Medical Research, 2010, 39(11): 52-56.
[5] Coughlan C, Walters S, Ledger W, et al. A comparison of psychological stress among women with and without reproductive failure[J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2014, 124(2): 143-147.
[6] Turner K, Reynolds-May MF, Zitek EM, et al. Stress and anxiety scores in first and repeat IVF cycles: a pilot study[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(5): e63743. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063743
[7] Duffy JN, Adamson GD, Benson E, et al. Top 10 priorities for future infertility research: an international consensus development study[J]. Fertil Steril, 2021, 115(1): 180-190.
[8] Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Specificity of cognitive emotion regulation strategies: a transdiagnostic examination[J]. Behav Res Ther, 2010, 48(10): 974-983.
[9] Martínez-Priego C, García-Noblejas BP, Roca P. Strategies and goals in emotion regulation models: a systematic review[J]. Front Psychol, 2024, 15: 1425465. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1425465
[10] Nolen-Hoeksema S, Wisco BE, Lyubomirsky S. Rethinking rumination[J]. Perspect Psychol Sci, 2008, 3(5): 400-424.
[11] 蔡杨, 何玉萍, 康旭丽, 等. 首次辅助生殖女性患者抑郁焦虑情绪与家庭功能、病耻感关系及对助孕结局的影响 [J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2024, 32(08): 1734-1739. CAI Yang, HE Yuping, KANG Xuli, et al. Correlation between the depression and anxiety of patients with the first assisted reproductive technology and their family function and stigma and its influence on the outcomes of assisted reproductio [J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 2024, 32(08): 1734-1739.
[12] Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, et al. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study[J]. JAMA, 1999, 282(18): 1737-1744.
[13] 陈曼曼, 胜利, 曲姗. 患者健康问卷在综合医院精神科门诊中筛查抑郁障碍的诊断试验[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2015, 29(4): 241-245. CHEN Manman, SHENG Li, QU Shan. Diagnostic test of screening depressive disorders in general hospital with the Patient Health Questionnaire[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2015, 29(4): 241-245.
[14] Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7[J]. Arch Intern Med, 2006, 166(10): 1092-1097.
[15] 曲姗, 胜利. 广泛性焦虑量表在综合医院心理科门诊筛查广泛性焦虑障碍的诊断试验[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2015, 29(12): 939-944. QU Shan, SHENG Li. Diagnostic test of screening generalized anxiety disorders in general hospital psychological department with GAD-7[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2015, 29(12): 939-944.
[16] Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2003, 85(2): 348-362.
[17] 张烜, 李佳欢, 王颖, 等. 情绪调节在实习护生正念水平与临床沟通能力之间的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2018, 56(12): 86-91. ZHANG Xuan, LI Jiahuan, WANG Ying, et al. Mediating effect of emotion regulation on relationship between mindfulness and clinical communication ability of nursing students[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2018, 56(12): 86-91.
[18] 王力, 柳恒超, 李中权, 等. 情绪调节问卷中文版的信效度研究[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2007, 15(6): 503-505. WANG Li, LIU Hengchao, LI Zhongquan, et al. Reliability and validity of emotion regulation questionnaire Chinese revised version[J]. China Journal of Health Psychology, 2007, 15(6): 503-505.
[19] Nolen-Hoeksema S, Morrow J. A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1991, 61(1): 115-121.
[20] Treynor W, Gonzalez R, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Rumination reconsidered: a psychometric analysis[J]. Cogn Ther Res, 2003, 27(3): 247-259.
[21] 韩秀, 杨宏飞. Nolen-Hoeksema反刍思维量表在中国的试用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(5): 550-551. HAN Xiu, YANG Hongfei. Chinese version of nolen-hoeksema ruminative responses scale(RRS)used in 912 college students: reliability and validity[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2009, 17(5): 550-551.
[22] 谢宝国, 龙立荣. 优势分析方法及其应用[J]. 心理科学, 2006, 29(4): 922-925. XIE Baoguo, LONG Lirong. Dominance analysis and its application[J]. Psychological Science, 2006, 29(4): 922-925.
[23] 朱敏清, 曹小梅, 庄旋霞. 首次体外受精—胚胎移植失败患者心理状况调查及其护理对策[J]. 中西医结合护理, 2022, 8(5): 157-159. ZHU Minqing, CAO Xiaomei, ZHUANG Xuanxia. Investigation on psychological status of patients with a failed first in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer attempt and its nursing countermeasures[J]. Journal of Clinical Nursing in Practice, 2022, 8(5): 157-159.
[24] 董悦芝, 杨晓霞. 初次与重复体外受精-胚胎移植治疗中夫妇焦虑、抑郁及社会支持状况探讨[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2012, 22(18): 83-86. DONG Yuezhi, YANG Xiaoxia. Anxiety, depression and social support for Couples in the first and repeated IVF-ET treatments[J]. China Journal of Modern Medicine, 2012, 22(18): 83-86.
[25] Hyde JS, Mezulis AH. Gender differences in depression: biological, affective, cognitive, and sociocultural factors[J]. Harv Rev Psychiatry, 2020, 28(1): 4-13.
[26] Abdolahi H M, Ghojazadeh M, Abdi S, et al. Effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on anxiety and depression of infertile women: A meta-analysis [J]. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction, 2019, 8(6): 251-259.
[27] Mosalanejad L, Khodabakshi Koolaee A, Jamali S. Effect of cognitive behavioral therapy in mental health and hardiness of infertile women receiving assisted reproductive therapy(ART)[J]. Iran J Reprod Med, 2012, 10(5): 483-488.
[28] Westlund Schreiner M, Jacobsen AM, Farstead BW, et al. Rumination induction task in fMRI: effects of rumination focused cognitive behavioral therapy and stability in youth[J]. J Affect Disord, 2025, 372: 608-615.
[29] 刘肖, 张龙苗, 林慧. 基于PERMA理念的正念减压在反复种植失败不孕患者中的应用[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2024, 28(35): 97-99, 113.
[30] 罗海琴, 谢日华, 梁绰意. 正念干预对不孕症女性心理健康和生活质量影响的Meta分析 [J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 28-34. LUO Haiqin, XIE Rihua, LIANG Chuoyi. Effects of mindfulness intervention on mental health and quality of life in infertile women:a Meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(17): 28-34.
[31] 马丹丹, 白彩锋, 毛芳香, 等. 不孕症患者情绪调节策略与抑郁和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2023, 37(8): 662-671. MA Dandan, BAI Caifeng, MAO Fangxiang, et al. Relation of emotion regulation strategies to depression and anxiety symptoms in infertile patients[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2023, 37(8): 662-671.
[32] 李宁, 刘舜禹, 高红, 等. 团队式认知重评辅导对慢性心衰患者负性情绪的影响[J]. 国际精神病学杂志, 2024, 51(5): 1649-1651. LI Ning, LIU Shunyu, GAO Hong, et al. Effects of team style cognitive reassessment counseling on negative emotions in patients with chronic heart failure[J]. Journal of International Psychiatry, 2024, 51(5): 1649-1651.
[33] 周灿. 认知重评团体辅导对PACU护士心理状况与满意度的影响[J]. 当代护士(下旬刊), 2021, 28(9): 186-188.
[34] 孙利静. 不孕症女性接受IVMT治疗期间焦虑、抑郁症状的发展轨迹及其与情绪调节策略的关系[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2021.
[35] Ochsner KN, Silvers JA, Buhle JT. Functional imaging studies of emotion regulation: a synthetic review and evolving model of the cognitive control of emotion[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2012, 1251: E1-24. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06751
[36] 李佳欢, 孙继伟, 张烜, 等. 不同情绪调节策略预测护士职业倦怠和抑郁症状的优势分析 [J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2020, 36(03): 219-224 LI Jiahuan, SUN Jiwei, ZHANG Xuan, et.al. Predictors of nurses job burnout and depressive symptoms: A dominance analysis of diverse emotion regulation strategies[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing, 2020, 36(3): 219-224.
[1] 马祎涵,袁昕赟,李嘉妮,韩旭,刁启迪,王艳,褚旭,张琨,胡蕾. 成人抑郁障碍患者童年虐待与频繁噩梦的关系:躯体症状的中介效应与社会支持的调节作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(5): 96-105.
[2] 陈光辉. 跨学科协同与交叉学科聚焦的学生心理健康问题研究与干预[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 1-9.
[3] 樊呈敏,宋静雨,于书彦,毛雪琴. 舒肝解郁胶囊治疗青少年抑郁障碍的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 17-23.
[4] 李芳华,刘娜,李晓宇,许殿花,王倩. 儿童青少年抑郁障碍患者服药依从性研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 24-34.
[5] 王倩,胡晓婧,王爱青,孙强,孟春燕,李芳华. 儿童青少年抑郁障碍患者非自杀性自伤文献的可视化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 93-107.
[6] 冯雅妮,牛晓欣,麻莉娜,施叶雯,苏永龙,谢雨杉,袁钰淇,朱思敏,周雅诺,刘郝羽,刘海琴,任晓勇. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者过度嗜睡严重程度与焦虑抑郁的相关性:一项大样本临床研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 19-27.
[7] 陈婵,李巨章,何稳,吴巧珍. 基于两样本孟德尔随机化研究抑郁症和抗抑郁药物靶基因与睡眠呼吸暂停的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 28-36.
[8] 万文静,高姗姗. 低分子肝素在生殖领域的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 117-124.
[9] 朱晓冉,李秀华,任延红,毛飞,方雨晴,赵张宁,王雅琳,刘天淏,张艳青,韩润冬. 帕金森病患者抑郁对睡眠、认知功能的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 63-70.
[10] 王立童,王战,吴静仪,吴艳盈,李永娜,唐洪. 耳穴电针联合高频重复经颅磁刺激对卒中后抑郁的疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 53-60.
[11] 王婷,张丽,王刚. 神经心理性哮喘[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 28-34.
[12] 曹丹凤,李慧. 儿童期不良经历对妊娠期抑郁症状的影响:母胎依恋的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 87-91.
[13] 解欣然,禚凤,杨楹,孔令华. 青少年抑郁障碍与多种心理行为问题的网络分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 49-58.
[14] 王新起,徐晶晶,许旺旺,张洋,高进. 25(OH)D、IGF-I及焦虑、抑郁症状与门诊青少年精神障碍患者非自杀性自伤的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 59-64.
[15] 赵心睿, 李静雅, 孔令华, 李丛冉, 韦雨欢, 杨楹. 青少年抑郁障碍与网络成瘾的关系:社交回避和学业挫败感的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 65-71.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!