您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (3): 121-126.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2022.1321

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

下肢外骨骼机器人康复训练对脑卒中偏瘫患者下肢运动的影响

李希1,2,王秉翔3,李娜1,曹丽娜1,李爱华4,冠潇1,张志勉1   

  1. 1.山东大学齐鲁医院健康管理中心, 山东 济南 250012;2.济宁市第一人民医院保健病房, 山东 济宁 272000;3.山东省立医院脊柱外科, 山东 济南 250021;4.济南医院康复医学科, 山东 济南 250013
  • 发布日期:2023-03-24
  • 通讯作者: 张志勉. E-mail:zhangzhimian@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省重大科技创新工程项目(2019JZZY011110)

Effects of lower limb exoskeleton robot rehabilitation training on lower limb motion of hemiplegic patients after stroke

LI Xi1,2, WANG Bingxiang3, LI Na1, CAO Lina1, LI Aihua4, GUAN Xiao1, ZHANG Zhimian1   

  1. 1. Department of Health Management Center, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Health Management, Jining No.1 Peoples Hospital, Jining 272000, Shandong, China;
    3. Department of Spine Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China;
    4. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Jinan Hospital Jinan 250013, Shandong, China
  • Published:2023-03-24

摘要: 目的 探讨下肢外骨骼机器人康复训练对脑卒中偏瘫患者下肢运动功能的影响。 方法 收集54例发病12个月内的脑卒中偏瘫患者,分为试验组27例和对照组27例。对照组患者进行常规康复训练及步行训练,试验组患者进行常规康复训练及下肢外骨骼机器人步行训练。分别于治疗前、治疗2周后和治疗4周后予以步行功能评估,包括6 min步行试验(6MWT)、10 m步行测试(10MWT)和功能性步行分级(FAC);Fugl-Meyer下肢运动评定量表(FMA-LE)评估下肢运动功能;使用运动捕捉系统采集患者的步态时空参数。通过以上各项指标分析两组患者下肢运动功能的变化情况。 结果 (1) 治疗2周和4周后,试验组和对照组患者6MWT、10MWT组内较治疗前均有明显提高,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05);治疗4周后,两组患者6MWT与治疗2周组内相比有进一步提高,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.001),仅试验组患者10MWT组内较治疗2周比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.008 5);(2) 治疗2周和4周后,试验组和对照组FAC评级和FMA-LE评分组内较治疗前相比有明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.01),两组治疗4周后FMA-LE较2周时有更进一步改善,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.001);(3) 治疗4周后,试验组步行周期较治疗前(P=0.003 5)、2周后(P=0.003 2)相比,差异有统计学意义。 结论 下肢外骨骼机器人可有效改善脑卒中偏瘫患者的下肢运动功能、步行功能和步行周期,其疗效与常规步行训练相当。

关键词: 下肢外骨骼机器人, 康复训练, 脑卒中, 偏瘫, 步行功能, 步态

Abstract: Objective To explore the effects of lower limb exoskeleton robot rehabilitation training on lower limb motor function of hemiplegic patients after stroke. Methods A total of 54 patients with stroke hemiplegia within 12 months of onset were randomly divided into the test group(n=27)and control group(n=27). The control group received routine rehabilitation training and walking training, while the test group received routine rehabilitation training combined with lower limb exoskeleton robot rehabilitation training. Walking function was assessed before, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after training. The 6 minute walking test(6MWT), 10 meter walking test(10MWT), functional ambulation category(FAC), and Fugl-Meyer assessment for lower extremity(FMA-LE)were used to assess the lower extremity motor function. Gait analysis was collected by using the motion capture system. Results (1) After 2 and 4 weeks of training, the 6MWT and 10MWT of both groups were significantly improved(P<0.05); after 4 weeks of training, the 6MWT of both groups was further improved compared with that of 2 weeks(P<0.001); the 10MWT of the test group was significantly improved compared with that of 2 weeks(P=0.008 5). (2) After 2 and 4 weeks of training, FAC and FMA-LE in both groups were significantly improved(P<0.01); FMA-LE in the two groups was further improved after 4 weeks of training compared with that of 2 weeks(P<0.001). (3) After 4 weeks of training, the gait cycle of the test group was significantly improved compared with that before training(P=0.003 5)and 2 weeks of training(P=0.003 2). Conclusion The lower limb exoskeleton robot can effectively improve the lower limb motor function, walking function and walking cycle, and its effect is equivalent to that of conventional walking training.

Key words: Lower limb exoskeleton robot, Rehabilitation training, Stroke, Hemiplegia, Walking function, Gait

中图分类号: 

  • R493
[1] Dong S, Fang J, Li Y, et al. The population attributable risk and clustering of stroke risk factors in different economical regions of China[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2020, 99(16): 19689. doi: 10.1097/MD.000000000-0019689.
[2] Sattelmayer M, Chevalley O, Steuri R, et al. Over-ground walking or robot-assisted gait training in people with. multiple sclerosis: does the effect depend on baseline walking speed and disease related disabilities? Asystematic review and meta-regression[J]. BMC Neurol, 2019, 19(1): 93-106.
[3] 包译, 朵强, 张源芮, 等. 下肢康复机器人对缺血性脑卒中恢复期患者步行功能的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2022, 37(8): 1079-1083.
[4] Louie DR,Eng JJ. Powered robotic exoskeletons in post-stroke rehabilitation of gait: a scoping review[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2016, 13(1): 53-62.
[5] Yao J, Sado T, Wang W, et al. The kickstart walk assist system for improving balance and walking function in stroke survivors: a feasibility study[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2021, 18(1): 42-53.
[6] Agarwala P, Salzman SH. Six-minute walk test: clinical role, technique, coding, and reimbursement[J]. Chest, 2020, 157(3): 603-611.
[7] Hesse S, Konrad M, Uhlenbrock D. Treadmill walking with partial body weight support versus floor walking in hemiparetic subjects[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1999, 80(4): 421-427.
[8] Sullivan KJ, Tilson JK, Cen SY, et al. Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke: standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials[J]. Stroke, 2011, 42(2): 427-432.
[9] 李宏伟, 张韬, 冯垚娟, 等. 外骨骼下肢康复机器人在脑卒中康复中的应用进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(7): 788-791. LI Hongwei, ZHANG Tao, FENG Yaojuan, et al. Application of exoskeleton-based lower limb rehabilitation robot in stroke rehabilitation(review)[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2017, 23(7): 788-791.
[10] 刘畅, 郄淑燕, 王寒明, 等. 下肢康复机器人对脑卒中偏瘫患者下肢运动功能与步行能力的效果[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(6): 696-700. LIU Chang, QIE Shuyan, WANG Hanming, et al. Effect of robot-assisted gait training on lower limb motor function and gait ability in patients with hemiplegia after stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2017, 23(6): 696-700.
[11] Zhong B, Cao J, McDaid A, et al. Synchronous position and compliance regulation on a bi-joint gait exoskeleton driven by pneumatic muscles[J]. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng, 2020, 17(1): 2162-2166.
[12] Louie DR, Eng JJ. Powered robotic exoskeletons in post-stroke rehabilitation of gait: a scoping review[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2016, 13(1): 53-62.
[13] Kim DH, Kang CS, Kyeong S. Robot-assisted gait training promotes brain reorganization after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study[J]. Neurorehabilitation, 2020, 46(4): 483-489.
[14] Chang WH, Kim MS, Huh JP, et al. Effects of robot-assisted gait training on cardiopulmonary fitness in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled study[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2012, 26(4): 318-324.
[15] 胡安龙, 顾旭东, 吴华, 等. 下肢康复机器人训练对脑卒中患者心肺功能的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2018, 40(3): 179-182. HU Anlong, GU Xudong, WU Hua, et al. The effects of robot-assisted lower-limb training on stroke survivors’ cardiopulmonary function[J]. Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2018, 40(3): 179-182.
[16] Pignolo L, Basta G, Carozzo S, et al. A body—weight-supported visual feedback system for gait recovering in stroke patients: a randomized controlled study[J]. Gait Posture, 2020, 82: 287-293.
[17] Chua K, Lim WS, Lim PH, et al. An exploratory clinical study on an automated, speed-sensing treadmill prototype with partial body weight support for hemiparetic gait rehabilitation in subacute and chronic stroke patients[J]. Front Neurol, 2020, 11: 747. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020. 00747.
[18] 施爱梅, 郑琦, 顾旭东, 等. 骨盆辅助式康复机器人训练对急性期脑梗死患者躯干控制及步行功能的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2022, 44(8): 695-699. SHI Aimei, ZHENG Qi, GU Xudong, et al. Robotic pelvic assistance better improves trunk control and walking after a stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2022, 44(8): 695-699.
[19] Lee SH, Lee HJ, Shim Y, et al. Wearable hip-assist robot modulates cortical activation during gait in stroke patients: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2020, 17(1): 145. doi: 10.1186/s12984 - 020-00777-0.
[20] Calabrò RS, Naro A, Russo M, et al. Shaping neuroplasticity by using powered exoskeletons in patients with stroke: a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2018, 15(1): 35. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0377-8.
[21] 龙建军, 王玉龙, 王同, 等.下肢外骨骼康复机器人对偏瘫患者步态参数的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2021, 36(9): 1107-1110. LONG Jianjun, WANG Yulong, WANG Tong, et al. Effects of lower limb exoskeleton robot on gait parameters in hemiplegic patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2021, 36(9): 1107-1110.
[22] Husemann B, Miiller F, Krewer C, et al. Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study[J]. Stroke, 2007, 38(2): 349-354.
[23] Tays G, Bao S, Javidialsaadi M, et al. Consolidation of use-dependent motor memories induced by passive movement training[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2020, 732: 135080. doi: 10.1016/j. neulet.2020.135080.
[24] Patterson KK, Mansfield A, Biasin L, et al. Longitudinal changes in poststroke spatiotemporal gait asymmetry over inpatient rehabilitation[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2015, 29(2): 153-162.
[25] 陈芳,季晶,苏彬,等.平地行走式下肢外骨骼机器人对脑卒中患者步行功能的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2022, 44(6): 497-502. CHEN Fang, JI Jing, SU Bin, et al. An exoskeleton robot can help improve the walking ability of stroke survivors[J]. Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2022, 44(6): 497-502.
[26] Li Y, Fan T, Qi Q, et al. Efficacy of a novel exoskeletal robot for locomotor rehabilitation in stroke patients: a multi-center, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2021, 13: 706569. doi: 10.3389/fnagi. 2021.706569.
[1] 季心宇,余思沂,孙圆圆,姬冰. 基于人工智能和步态分析的骨科疾病辅助诊疗方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 34-43.
[2] 逄锦宏,苏萍,乔俊鹏,陈巧巧,陈学禹,赵颖颖,施婕,孙晓茹,李秋春,何蕊言,范轶欧,迟蔚蔚. 老年人群可改变心血管危险因素聚集模式与脑卒中的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 11-19.
[3] 申路佳,逯天威,巩伟明,赵岩松,王淑康,袁中尚. 代谢风险评分在2型糖尿病人群心血管结局预测中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(8): 69-78.
[4] 陈莹莹,王鲁,胡锡峰,朱高培,薛付忠. 基于贝叶斯网络的2型糖尿病患者并发脑卒中风险预测[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(8): 94-102.
[5] 宋思豪,程传龙,李树芬,席睿,梁珂梦,倪志松,崔峰,李秀君. 大气污染对淄博市缺血性脑卒中患者寿命损失年的短期影响及极端温度事件修饰效应[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 84-94.
[6] 王立童,王战,吴静仪,吴艳盈,李永娜,唐洪. 耳穴电针联合高频重复经颅磁刺激对卒中后抑郁的疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 53-60.
[7] 刘淋,王晓楠,杨雅溪,王江腾,李旭,周新丽,管庆波,张栩. 甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(8): 93-100.
[8] 李晨淑,王瑞华,陆信武. 不同腔内技术治疗非A非B型夹层的神经系统并发症研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 1-7.
[9] 张伯韬,仉率杰,孙爽爽,袁莹,胡锡峰,贾晓峰,于媛媛,薛付忠. 基于贝叶斯网络的缺血性脑卒中筛查模型构建[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 73-84.
[10] 刘培来,李学州,卢群山,孙厚义,杨杰,李哲. 膝关节置换术后常用康复器具的应用与疗效分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(10): 1-7.
[11] 房启迪,杨淑霞,齐畅,程传龙,韩闯,刘盈,崔峰,李秀君. 基于镇街尺度的淄博市2019年脑卒中时空分布[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 81-88.
[12] 赵璇,李晓鹏,李剑,田彬,王广君. 磁珠耳穴贴压联合重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中后抑郁的疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(1): 65-70.
[13] 张伟,谭文浩,李贻斌. 基于深度强化学习的四足机器人运动控制发展现状与展望[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 61-66.
[14] 陈希,刘新宇,范立霞,田永昊,原所茂. 老年脊柱疾病应用颈动脉超声评估缺血性脑卒中风险的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(5): 48-55.
[15] 郝小蕊,赵昌盛. 肠内和肠外营养支持对早期重症脑卒中患者血清ALT、SCr浓度变化及并发症的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(3): 80-84.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!