您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (4): 1-5.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.0126

• 基础医学 •    下一篇

新型冠状病毒混合样品检测研究

董宏杰1,张俊梅1,2,王帅1,王宏伟1,张坤迪1,胡玮1,谢晓鸿2,谢时灵2,3,谷立川1   

  1. 1.山东大学微生物技术国家重点实验室, 山东 青岛 266000;2.山东仕达思医疗科技有限公司, 山东 济南 250000;3.山东仕达思生物产业有限公司, 山东 济南 250000
  • 发布日期:2021-04-30
  • 通讯作者: 谷立川. E-mail:lcgu@sdu.edu.cn谢时灵. E-mail:xieshiling@shidasi.net
  • 基金资助:
    山东省重点研发计划(2020CXGC011305)

Research on mixed sample test for SARS-CoV-2

DONG Hongjie1, ZHANG Junmei1,2, WANG Shuai1, WANG Hongwei1, ZHANG Kundi1HU Wei1, XIE Xiaohong2, XIE Shiling2,3, GU Lichuan1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China;
    2. Shandong Shtars Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Jinan 250000, Shandong, China;
    3. Shandong Shtars Biological Industry Co., Ltd., Jinan 250000, Shandong, China
  • Published:2021-04-30

摘要: 目的 探究在新型冠状病毒样本混合检测中,稀释混样检测和混采检测的合理样本数量,为大人群样本的核酸筛查提供更为快捷有效的检测方案。 方法 设计一种利用注射器纯化柱进行大体积样本保存液核酸提取方法,在稀释混样检测和混采检测中,对比使用该方法将全部样本保存液提取核酸和只取200 μL样本保存液提取核酸时检测结果的差异。 结果 稀释混样检测中,对于单独一份阳性样本,取全部保存液样本提取核酸时ORF1ab基因和N基因的Ct值比取200 μL保存液样本提取核酸时分别小3.583、2.904;当1份阳性样本与9份、19份阴性样本混合后,将全部样本保存液提取核酸,不同混合人份检测的Ct值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);当混合样本多于20份时,Ct值明显变大。混采检测中,取所有保存液样本提取核酸检测所得Ct值明显小于只取200 μL保存液样本提取核酸所得Ct值(目前通行方案)。 结论 在新型冠状病毒混合检测中,采用注射器纯化柱法将全部样本的混合保存液提取核酸,稀释混样检测时,可将混合人数上限由20人提高到50人;采用混采检测时,可以明显降低核酸检测的Ct值,从而提高检出率,减少混合检测过程中假阴性现象的发生。

关键词: 新型冠状病毒, 稀释混样检测, 混采检测, 注射器纯化柱, RT-PCR

Abstract: Objective To determine the reasonable sample sizes of diluted mixed sample test and n-in-1 test in the detection of SARS-CoV-2, so as to provide a more efficient scheme for nucleic acid screening of large samples. Methods A method was designed to extract nucleic acid from the preservation solution of large volume samples using a syringe purification column. In both diluted mixed sample test and n-in-1 test, this method was used in the extraction of nucleic acid from the total preservation solution and from 200 μL solution. The test results were compared. Results In diluted mixed sample test, for a single positive sample, the Ct values of ORF1ab gene and N gene were 3.583 and 2.904 lower from the total preservation solution than from the 200 μL solution; when one positive sample was mixed with 9 negative samples and 19 negative samples, there was no statistical difference in Ct values between the two sample sizes(P>0.05); when the number of mixed samples was more than 20, the Ct values increased significantly. In the n-in-1 test, the Ct values of nucleic acid extracted from total preservation solution was significantly lower than that from 200 μL solution(the current scheme). Conclusion In mixed sample detection, using a syringe purification column to extract nucleic acid from the total preservation solution can increase the maximum number of sample size from 20 to 50. With this strategy, the Ct values of nucleic acid test can be significantly reduced, so as to improve the detection rate and reduce the number of false-negative cases in n-in-1 test.

Key words: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, Diluted mixed sample test, n-in-1 test, Syringe purification column, RT-PCR

中图分类号: 

  • R574
[1] Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, et al. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern [J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10223): 470-473.
[2] Chan JF,Yuan SF, Kok KH, et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission:a study of a family cluster [J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10223): 514-523.
[3] 新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行 8 版)[EB/OL].(2020-08-18)[2021-03-26]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-08/19/5535757/files/da89edf7cc9244fbb34ecf6c61df40bf.
[4] 李太生, 曹玮, 翁利, 等. 北京协和医院关于“新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎”诊疗建议方案(V2.0)[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2020, 11(6): 672-675. LI Taisheng, CAO Wei, WENG Li, et al. Diagnosis and Clinical Management of 2019 Novel Coronavirus(2019-nCoV)Infection: An Operational Recommendation of Peking Union Medical College Hospital(V2.0)[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2020, 11(6): 672-675.
[5] 董宏杰, 张俊梅, 王宏伟, 等. 新型冠状病毒核酸检测过程中灵敏度损失的定量分析[J] 山东大学学报(医学版), 2021, 59(1): 1-7. DONG Hongjie, ZHANG Junmei, WANG Hongwei, et al. Quantitative analysis of the loss of sensitivity in the nucleic acid detection of SARS-CoV-2 [J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2021, 59(1): 1-7.
[6] Cruz MP, Santos E, Cervantes MAV, et al. COVID-19, a worldwide public health emergency [J]. Rev Clin Esp, 2020, 221(1): 55-61.
[7] Harrison AG, Lin T, Wang P. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and pathogenesis [J]. Trends Immunol, 2020, 41(12): 1100-1115.
[8] Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The species Severe acute res-piratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2 [J]. Nat Microbiol, 2020, 5(4): 536-544.
[9] Cheng MP, Papenburg J, Desjardins M, et al. Diagnostic testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2: a narrative review [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2020, 172(11): 726-734.
[10] Venkat Kumar G, Jeyanthi V, Ramakrishnan S, et al. A short review on antibody therapy for COVID-19 [J]. New Microbes New Infect, 2020, 35(20): 100682-100685.
[11] WHO Coronavirus Disease(COVID-19)Dashboard [EB/OL].(2021-01-15)[2021-03-26]. https://covid19.who.int/.
[12] Moira CY, Xu RH. SARS: epidemiology [J]. Nov, 2003, 8(Suppl):9-14.
[13] 袁易, 王铭杰, 张欣欣. 第三代测序技术的主要特点及其在病毒基因组研究中的应用 [J]. 微生物与感染, 2016, 11(6): 380-384. YUAN Yi, WANG Mingjie, ZHANG Xinxin. characteristics of the third generation sequencing technology and its application in researching of viral genome [J]. Journal of Microbes and Infection, 2016, 11(6): 380-384.
[14] 国务院应对新型冠状病毒感染肺炎疫情联防联控机制关于做好新冠肺炎疫情常态化防控工作的指导意见[EB/OL].(2020-05-07)[2021-03-26]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2020-05/08/content_5509896.htm.
[15] 王国强, 邓硕, 汪嘉懿,等. 样本混合检测在COVID-19诊断中的应用研究[J]. 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志, 2020, 34(5): 459-461.
[16] 关于印发新冠病毒核酸筛查稀释混样检测技术指引的通知[EB/OL].(2020-07-21)[2021-03-26]. http://wjw.fujian.gov.cn/xxgk/fgwj/gjwj/202007/t20200723_5329869.htm.
[17] 关于印发新冠病毒核酸10合1混采检测技术规范的通知[EB/OL].(2020-08-17)[2021-03-26]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-08/19/content_5535756.htm.
[1] 张学宇,张学海,孙文青,刘晗,姜金波,刘寒,李远,陈晓梅. 重症新型冠状病毒肺炎伴侵袭性肺曲霉病及反复致命性消化道出血1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 56-61.
[2] 王玉淼,崔晓霈,张红雨. 高龄老年新型冠状病毒肺炎患者应用抗凝治疗的短期疗效和安全性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 21-31.
[3] 王骏仁,李道卫,王星光,姜淑娟. 吸入布地奈德/福莫特罗治疗新型冠状病毒感染后咳嗽的疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(8): 50-53.
[4] 高丽鹤,任婧婧,李岩,李强,马万山,李焕杰,陈振,欧兰香,张绍明,朱之炜,丁兴龙,李红霞,王岩,张忠法,汪运山. 新型冠状病毒中和抗体酶联免疫检测试剂盒的制备及应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(4): 77-85.
[5] 王园园,孙云. 合并新型冠状病毒肺炎的维持性血液透析患者死亡危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(11): 68-73.
[6] 曹义海. 血管生成在疾病治疗中的应用与展望[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 9-14.
[7] 杨璇,李岩志,马伟,贾崇奇. 基于两样本孟德尔随机化的肺功能与新型冠状病毒肺炎病死风险的因果关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 104-111.
[8] 周溪,黄霂晗,任玉洁,邱洋. 新型冠状病毒感染与天然免疫及炎症反应[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(5): 15-21.
[9] 于莹,张功,刘晶,颜世童,韩涛,黄海量. 基于网络药理学和分子对接方法探析黄芪预防新型冠状病毒肺炎的潜在作用机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(4): 6-16.
[10] 任敏敏,王广梅,张丽,杨瑶瑶,封丹珺. 335名抗疫一线护理人员心理弹性对共情疲劳的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(2): 88-94.
[11] 董宏杰,张俊梅,王宏伟,王茂凤,张坤迪,张冯瑜,王帅,胡玮,谢时灵,谷立川. 新型冠状病毒核酸检测过程中灵敏度损失的定量分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 1-7.
[12] 曹爱华,段春红,邱丙平,路苓,李可亮, 刘学工,周志远,孙建华,鞠秀丽. 山东省儿童新型冠状病毒感染者流行病学及临床特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(6): 34-40.
[13] 程召平,段艳华,姚金坤,李岩,顾慧,袁宪顺,刘斌,毕万利,宋照亮,聂佩,陈月芹,孙占国,刘善平,王鲁光,唐忠仁,魏相磊,董亮,王春亭,王锡明. 105例新型冠状病毒肺炎胸部CT影像学特征——山东省多中心回顾性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(5): 38-45.
[14] 李晓非,刘贵明,李婉澜,吕松琴,聂磊,张娟,徐丽萍,陆霓虹. 化学发光法检测新型冠状病毒抗体在临床的应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(5): 46-50.
[15] 袁勇贵,李磊,沈仲夏,陈刚,吴义高,岳莹莹. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下精神障碍诊疗的防控策略[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(4): 1-6.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!