您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (11): 100-107.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.0429

• 公共卫生与管理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

认知功能在老年人社会资本与身体功能健康间的中介作用

刘新雨1,2,王权1,2,3,琚号杰1,2,孙晓杰1,2   

  1. 1. 山东大学齐鲁医学院公共卫生学院卫生管理与政策研究中心, 山东 济南 250012;2. 国家卫生健康委员会卫生经济与政策研究重点实验室(山东大学), 山东 济南 250012;3. 多伦多大学卫生政策管理与评价研究所, 加拿大 多伦多 M5S2Z9
  • 发布日期:2021-11-11
  • 通讯作者: 孙晓杰. E-mail:xiaojiesun@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金(ZR2019MG013);山东大学青年交叉科学创新群体—文旅康养产业交叉融合创新研究团队(2020QNQT019)

Mediating effect of cognition on the relationship between social capital and functional health of elderly people

LIU Xinyu1,2, WANG Quan1,2,3, JU Haojie1,2, SUN Xiaojie1,2   

  1. 1. Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research(Shandong University), Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    3. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation(IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada, M5S2Z9
  • Published:2021-11-11

PDF (PC)

727

摘要： 目的 分析认知功能在社会资本对身体功能健康影响中的中介效应。 方法 基于2015年中国健康与养老全国追踪调查(CHARLS)数据,选取4 451名老年人为研究对象,以社会信任、社会支持(经济支持和生活照料支持)、社会参与和互惠测量社会资本。总效应被分解为直接效应和间接效应,采用基于Karlson-Holm-Breen方法的Logistic回归分析探讨各效应。 结果 调整潜在混杂因素(包括年龄、婚姻状况、个人存款、识字状况、居住地、吸烟、饮酒、夜间睡眠时长、自评健康、所患慢性病情况及残疾状况)后,老年人中的高社会信任(OR=1.249,95%CI:1.072~1.455)、有照料支持(OR=1.351,95%CI:1.180~1.546)及有社会参与(OR=1.167,95%CI:1.021~1.334)者的身体功能更健康。认知功能在社会参与对身体功能健康影响的总效应中发挥了中介效应(OR=1.046,95%CI:1.008~1.085)。中介效应占总效应的29.22%。 结论 认知功能在社会资本对身体功能健康的影响中具有中介效应。提高老年人的社会资本水平不仅直接有助于提升其身体功能,而且还可通过增强其认知功能进而改善其身体功能。

关键词: 身体功能健康, 认知, 社会资本, 中介效应

Abstract: Objective To estimate the mediating effect of cognition on the association between social capital and functional health. Methods The database of China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study(CHARLS)was applied in the study and 4,451 seniors aged 60 years and above in Wave 4(2015)of the survey were retrieved. Social capital was measured by social trust, social support, social participation and reciprocity. The total effect was classified as direct effect and indirect effect through Logistic regression analysis based on the Karlson-Holm-Breen method. Results After the potential confounders were adjusted, including age, marital status, bank deposit, literacy, residence, smoking, drinking, sleep duration at night, self-rated health, chronic diseases and disability, older adults with high social trust(OR=1.249, 95%CI: 1.072-1.455), care(OR=1.351, 95%CI: 1.180-1.546)and social participation(OR=1.167, 95%CI: 1.021-1.334)had better functional health. Cognition played a mediating role in the total effect of social participation on functional health(OR=1.046, 95%CI: 1.008-1.085). The mediating effect of cognition accounted for 29.22% of the total effect. Conclusion Cognition has a mediating effect on the association between social capital and functional health. Improving the level of social capital of older adults can directly improve their functional health, and contribute to their physical function by enhancing cognition.

Key words: Functional health, Cognition, Social capital, Mediating effect

中图分类号: 

  • R193
[1] National Bureau of Statistics of China. Statistical Communiqué of the People's Republic of China on the 2018 National Economic and Social Development [EB/OL].(2019-02-28)[2020-05-24]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/201902/t20190228_1651335.html.
[2] Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, et al. Frailty in elderly people [J]. Lancet, 2013, 381(9868): 752-762.
[3] Jing Z, Li J, Wang Y, et al. The mediating effect of psychological distress on cognitive function and physical frailty among the elderly: Evidence from rural Shandong, China [J]. J Affect Disord, 2020, 268: 88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.012.
[4] Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype [J]. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2001, 56(3): M146-M156.
[5] Xue QL. The frailty syndrome: definition and natural history [J]. Clin Geriatr Med, 2011, 27(1): 1-15.
[6] 人民网. 我国老年人失能率16%[N]. 珠江晚报数字报, 2019-07-31.
[7] 胡杰容. 社会经济地位与老人身体功能健康的关系: 以锻炼和医保为中介变量[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 35(4): 61-69. HU Jierong. The relation of socioeconomic status and functional health of Chinese elderly people: physic exercises and health insurance as mediator [J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 61-69.
[8] 袁林林. 我国老年人社会资本对吸烟和饮酒行为的影响分析: 基于CHARLS数据的实证研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2019.
[9] 李甲森, 冯星淋. 基于多水平模型的社会资本对中老年人健康的影响研究[J]. 医学与社会, 2016, 29(12): 4-7. LI Jiasen, FENG Xinglin. Analysis of impact of social capital on health among middle-aged and elderly people based on multilevel model [J]. Medicine and Society, 2016, 29(12): 4-7.
[10] 魏娇娇. 社会信任的健康效应及其城乡差异-基于CGSS2015数据的分析[J]. 云南行政学院学报, 2018, 20(5): 90-96.
[11] Idrovo AJ, Ruiz-Rodríguez M, Manzano-Patiño AP. Beyond the income inequality hypothesis and human health: a worldwide exploration [J]. Rev Saude Publica, 2010, 44(4): 695-702.
[12] Kelly ME, Duff H, Kelly S, et al. The impact of social activities, social networks, social support and social relationships on the cognitive functioning of healthy older adults: a systematic review [J]. Syst Rev, 2017, 6(1): 259.
[13] Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, et al. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium [J]. Soc Sci Med, 2000, 51(6): 843-857.
[14] Nieminen T, Martelin T, Koskinen S, et al. Social capital as a determinant of self-rated health and psychological well-being [J]. Int J Public Heal, 2010, 55(6): 531-542.
[15] Lee Y, Kim J, Back JH. The influence of multiple lifestyle behaviors on cognitive function in older persons living in the community [J]. Prev Med, 2009, 48(1): 86-90.
[16] Moore S, Kawachi I. Twenty years of social capital and health research: a glossary [J]. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2017, 71(5): 513-517.
[17] Xue X, Cheng M. Social capital and health in China: exploring the mediating role of lifestyle [J]. BMC Public Health, 2017, 17(1): 863.
[18] Ayalon L, Heinik J, Litwin H. Population group differences in cognitive functioning in a national sample of Israelis fifty years and older [J]. Res Aging, 2010, 32(3): 304-322.
[19] 李漫漫, 付轶男, 吴茂春, 等. 老年人日常生活活动能力与认知功能的相关性研究[J]. 护理研究, 2018, 32(11): 1749-1752. LI Manman, FU Yinan, WU Maochun, et al. Correlation between activities of daily living and cognitive function of the elderly [J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2018, 32(11): 1749-1752.
[20] 张映琦, 周华东, 李敬诚, 等. 日常生活活动能力等因素对老年人认知功能的影响[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2003,25(22):2037-2039. ZHANG Yingqi, ZHOU Huadong, LI Jingcheng, et al. Effect of ADL on cognitive impairment in community-dwelling elderly people in Chongqing [J]. Acta Academiae Medicinae Militaris Tertiae, 2003, 25(22): 2037-2039.
[21] 李东. 认知功能训练对老年脑梗死患者运动功能和日常生活能力的影响[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(30): 54-56. LI Dong. Impact of cognitive function training on motor function and daily living ability for elderly cerebral infarction patients [J]. China Modern Medicine, 2020, 27(30): 54-56.
[22] Fratiglioni L, Paillard-Borg S, Winblad B. An active and socially integrated lifestyle in late life might protect against dementia [J]. Lancet Neurol, 2004, 3(6): 343-353.
[23] Bielak AA. How can we not ‘lose it’ if we still dont understand how to ‘use it’? Unanswered questions about the influence of activity participation on cognitive performance in older age: a mini-review [J]. Gerontology, 2010, 56(5): 507-519.
[24] 薛新东. 社会参与对我国中老年人认知功能的影响[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2018, 11(5): 1-9. XUE Xindong. The effect of social participation on the cognitive functioning of middle-aged and elderly people in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Health Policy, 2018, 11(5): 1-9.
[25] Wang HX, Jin Y, Hendrie HC, et al. Late life leisure activities and risk of cognitive decline [J]. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2013, 68(2): 205-213.
[26] Wu Cary. Social capital and COVID-19: a multidimensional and multilevel approach [J]. Chinese Sociological Review, 2021, 53(1). doi:10.1080/21620555.2020.1814139.
[27] Andrew MK, Rockwood K. Social vulnerability predicts cognitive decline in a prospective cohort of older Canadians [J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2010, 6(4): 319-325.
[28] Ellwardt L, Aartsen M, Deeg D, et al. Does loneliness mediate the relation between social support and cognitive functioning in later life? [J]. Soc Sci Med, 2013, 98: 116-124. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.002.
[29] 贺志强, 马万瑞, 孙晓娅, 等. 宁夏地区老年人社会资本与认知功能障碍的关联性分析[J]. 国际精神病学杂志, 2019, 46(5): 803-806. HE Zhiqiang, MA Wanrui, SUN Xiaoya, et al. Study on the relationship between social capital and cognitive impairment of the elderly in Ningxia [J]. Journal of International Psychiatry, 2019, 46(5): 803-806.
[30] 周绪凤, 马亚娜. 中国农村老年人失能状况及影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2017, 33(11): 1665-1668. ZHOU Xufeng, MA Yana. Prevalence and impact factors of disability among elderly people in rural China [J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2017, 33(11): 1665-1668.
[31] 蒋炜歌. 新型农村社会养老保险制度实施效果评估—基于心理健康和认知功能的视角[D]. 北京: 对外经济贸易大学, 2018.
[32] Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review [J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1992, 40(9): 922-935.
[33] AKUKK. Comparing coefficients ofnested nonlinear probability models[J]. Stata J, 2006, 3(11): 420-438.
[34] 陈瑞, 郑毓煌, 刘文静. 中介效应分析: 原理、程序、Bootstrap方法及其应用[J]. 营销科学学报, 2013, 9(4): 120-135. CHEN Rui, ZHENG Yuhuang, LIU Wenjing. Mediation analysis:principle, procedure, bootstrap methods and applications [J]. Journal of Marketing Science, 2013, 9(4): 120-135.
[35] Li Y, Zheng H, Tian L, et al. Mediatory role of abdominal obesity in the association of early menopause with diabetes among middle-aged and older Chinese women [J]. Menopause, 2020, 27(9): 1037-1041.
[36] Shen Y, Yeatts DE, Cai T, et al. Social capital and self-rated health among middle-aged and older adults in China: a multilevel analysis [J]. Res Aging, 2014, 36(4): 497-521.
[37] 陈爱萍. 中国城市居民人际信任的现状与成因分析—对10城市2049位居民的调查[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2006.
[38] 陶裕春, 申昱. 社会支持对农村老年人身心健康的影响[J]. 人口与经济, 2014(3): 3-14. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4149.2014.03.02. TAO Yuchun, SHEN Yu. The influence of social support on the physical and mental health of the rural elderly [J]. Popul Econ, 2014(3): 3-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4149.2014.03.02.
[39] 宋月萍. 精神赡养还是经济支持:外出务工子女养老行为对农村留守老人健康影响探析[J]. 人口与发展, 2014, 20(4): 37-44. SONG Yueping. Mental support or economic giving: migrating childrens elderly care behavior and health conditions of left-behind elderly in rural China [J]. Population and Development, 2014, 20(4): 37-44.
[40] 武菊芳, 李文廷. 对公民慈善认知的调查与思考—以石家庄市为例[J]. 人民论坛, 2011, 29: 162-163. doi: 10.16619/j.cnki.rmlt.2011.29.087. WU Jufang, LI Wenting. Investigation and reflection on citizens cognition of charity - Taking Shijiazhuang City as an example [J]. Peoples Forum, 2011, 29: 162-163. doi:10.16619/j.cnki.rmlt.2011.29.087.
[1] 宋一鸣,王佳丰,韩晓娟,杜怡峰. 脑维持与认知功能:测量、影响因素和机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 1-7.
[2] 陈婉毓,黄莉莉,卞宏生,王艳艳,于爽,金阳. 中药调控PI3K/AKT通路改善睡眠障碍及认知障碍的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 8-18.
[3] 李建锋,张展,丁新华,高奋堂,何勤利,谢萍. 欧洲人群饮食因素与认知功能障碍关系的孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 36-43.
[4] 张洪嘉,姚文环,寇蕊蕊,程东,张天亮,赵秀兰. 镉与微塑料单独及联合暴露对小鼠认知功能的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 44-54.
[5] 朱晓冉,李秀华,任延红,毛飞,方雨晴,赵张宁,王雅琳,刘天淏,张艳青,韩润冬. 帕金森病患者抑郁对睡眠、认知功能的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 63-70.
[6] 张艳艳,孙菁妮,朱凤英,杜以君,赵常梅,曹兴涛,张媛,吕明. 社会支持在脊髓损伤致神经源性膀胱患者自我管理与出院准备度间的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 117-124.
[7] 孙潇,马传伟,赵敏,席波. 预防医学本科生专业认知度与认可度现状及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 109-116.
[8] 于菲萍,李鑫,司明舒,张丹,苏永刚. 医学生医养结合认知程度与养老就业意愿[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 105-114.
[9] 任延红,李秀华,朱晓冉,方雨晴,赵张宁,毛飞,王雅琳,张艳青,刘天淏,徐新荣. 艾地苯醌对帕金森病认知障碍患者的疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(10): 106-114.
[10] 范佳旭, 成芳,乔俊鹏,费海程,陈学禹,赵云,贾红英. 中介或混杂因素:是否应调整肥胖以估计三卤甲烷对甲状腺功能的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(1): 102-110.
[11] 于晴晴,常开锋,李吉庆,张凯,付苹,刘晓雯,赵英淇,薛付忠. 中老年人群高血压在非甾体抗炎药暴露与心脑血管疾病风险关联中的中介分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(8): 79-85.
[12] 亓倩,郝田宇,徐嘉蔚,王光海,吴凤娟,刘明涛,姜鹏,董亮,李玉. 山东地区呼吸科医师对支气管扩张症诊治认知的现状调查[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 63-71.
[13] 黄珊,娄能俊,韩晓琳,梁中昊,华梦羽,庄向华,陈诗鸿. 高糖环境下Lipin1对神经元代谢组学的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 1-8.
[14] 韩梅,孟维静,陶子琨,杨希,徐雅琪,穆华夏,卜伟晓,王素珍,石福艳. 基于G-计算的高血压、抑郁在2型糖尿病与认知功能之间的因果多中介分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(10): 101-108.
[15] 李献云,杨甫德. 自杀倾向的认知行为治疗[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 1-9.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发