经胸小切口封堵与经皮介入封堵术治疗房间隔缺损的比较

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.223

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较经胸微创小切口封堵术与经皮介入封堵术治疗继发孔型房间隔缺损(ASD)的效果及各自优缺点。方法回顾性分析2004年1月~2014年8月接受封堵治疗的146例ASD患者的临床资料。将患者分成2组,经胸组(43例)采用经食管超声心动图(TEE)引导下微创小切口封堵术,经皮组(103例)采用数字减影血管造影技术(DSA)和TEE引导下介入封堵术。收集患者术前及术后临床资料,比较两种方法的疗效、费用等情况。结果两组患者的年龄、性别、体质量和房间隔缺损断径大小差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。经皮组手术时间和术后住院时间及住院费用均小于经胸组(P<0.05)。经胸组全部封堵成功,经皮组2例封堵失败后转外科急诊手术治疗。两组均无输血及死亡病例。术后1个月复查经TTE测量的左房前后径、左室舒张末内径较术前减小(P均<0.05),残余分流情况、左心室射血分数及右室内径差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论两种方法均为微创手术,均可安全有效地用于单纯继发孔型ASD的治疗。经胸微创小切口封堵方法的成功率高,不需接受射线,适应证更广;而介入封堵方法的手术时间和住院时间更短,费用低,创伤更小,美容效果更好。

关键词: 微创性, 房间隔缺损, 外科手术, 介入封堵术

Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical efficacy, advantages and disadvantages between minimally invasive occlusion procedure and percutaneous interventional occlusion for treating patients with atrial septal defect(ASD). Methods The clinical data of 146 ASD patients treated during Jan. 2004 and Aug. 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A(n=43)were treated with minimally invasive occlusion procedure under the guidance of transesophageal echocardiography(TEE); group B(n=103)received percutaneous interventional occlusion guided by TEE and digital subtraction angiography(DSA). Clinical data before and after the surgery were collected; efficacy and cost of both approaches were compared. Results Age, gender, body weight and diameter of ASD were similar between the two groups(all P>0.05). Operation time, postoperative hospital stay and mean total cost were significantly lower in group B than in group A(all P<0.05). All cases in group A were successfully occluded with satisfactory results. The 2 unsuccessful patients in group B switched to emergency surgical operation. No patients in both groups needed blood transfusion and no death occurred. One month after operation, transthoracic echocardiography(TTE)derived diameters of left atrial and left ventricular were smaller than those preoperative(both P<0.05). Incidence of residual shunt, and left ventricular ejection fraction were similar before and 1 month 山东大学学报 (医学版)54卷2期 -卢中,等.经胸小切口封堵与经皮介入封堵术治疗房间隔缺损的比较 \=-after operation(both P>0.05). Conclusion The two approaches are both minimally invasive operation for treating ASD, which can be performed safely and effectively. Minimally invasive occlusion procedure does not need X-ray, and has higher success rate and wider indications than percutaneous interventional occlusion. Percutaneous interventional occlusion shortens the operation time and hospitalization, has lower medical cost, and provides better cosmetic results.

Key words: Minimally invasive, Percutaneous interventional occlusion, Atrial septal defect, Surgical procedures

中图分类号:

R654.2

卢中,申运华,严中亚,黄向阳,李春生,李华宝,杨冬妹. 经胸小切口封堵与经皮介入封堵术治疗房间隔缺损的比较[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(2): 49-52.

LU Zhong, SHEN Yunhua, YAN Zhongya, HUANG Xiangyang, LI Chunsheng, LI Huabao, YANG Dongmei. Treatment of atrial septal defect: minimally invasive occlusion procedure vs percutaneous interventional occlusion[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2016, 54(2): 49-52.

参考文献

[1] Wei X, Yi W, Xu X, et al. Transthoracic occlusion for secundum atrial septal defects unsuitable for transcatheter occlusion approach[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2011, 142(1): 113-119.
[2] Zhu P, Sun Y, Yang Q, et al. Intraoperative device closure of atrial septal defects with minimal transthoracic invasion: a single-center experience[J]. Tex Heart Inst J, 2013, 40(3): 256-260.
[3] 赵立健, 韩波, 张建军, 等. 经导管介入治疗90例室间隔缺损疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(5): 89-92. ZHAO Lijian, HAN Bo, ZHANG Jianjun, et al. Evaluation of trans-catheter closure in 90 cases of congenital ventricular septal defect[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2010, 48(5): 89-92.
[4] Adiele DK, Chinawa JM, Arodiwe IO, et al. Atrial septal defects: Pattern, clinical profile, surgical techniques and outcome at Innova heart hospital: A 4-year review[J]. Niger Med J, 2014, 55(2): 126-129.
[5] Huang TC, Hsieh KS, Lin CC, et al. Clinical results of percutaneous closure of large secundum atrial septal defects in children using the Amplatzer septal occluder[J]. Heart Vessels, 2008, 23(3): 187-192.
[6] 靳有鹏, 王玉林, 韩波, 等. 不同年龄房间隔缺损封堵术后心脏电生理及几何形态的变化[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(8): 806-809. JIN Youpeng, WANG Yulin, HAN Bo, et al. Electrical and geometric changes after percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2006, 44(8): 806-809.
[7] 赵世华, 王诚, 蒋世良, 等. 成人继发孔型房间隔缺损形态学特点及其对经导管封堵术的影响[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2006, 34(11): 987-990. ZHAO Shihua, WANG Cheng, JIANG Shiliang, et al. Morphological features of secundum atrial septal defect in adult and implications for transcatheter closure[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiology, 2006, 34(11): 987-990.
[8] Watanabe N, Taniguchi M, Akagi T, et al. Usefulness of the right parasternal approach to evaluate the morphology of atrial septal defect for transcatheter closure using two-dimensional and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2012, 25(4): 376-382.
[9] Jampates S, Hengrussamee K. A comparative study of outcomes after transcatheter closure of secundum-type atrial septum defect in adults younger than 60 years and the older ones[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2014, 97(11): 1133-1139.
[10] Kang SL, Tometzki A, Caputo M, et al. Longer-term outcome of perventricular device closure of muscular ventricular septal defects in children[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2015, 85(6): 998-1005.
[11] Baruteau AE, Petit J, Lambert V, et al. Transcatheter closure of large atrial septal defects: feasibility and safety in a large adult and pediatric population[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2014, 7(6): 837-843.
[12] 张玉顺, 兰贝蒂, 李寰, 等. 房间隔缺损介入治疗封堵器选择的影响因素[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2009, 37(11): 981-985. ZHANG Yushun, LAN Beidi, LI Huan, et al. Factors influencing the choice of atrial septal occluder for transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiology, 2009, 37(11): 981-985.
[13] Takaya Y, Akagi T, Kijima Y, et al. Long-term outcome after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect in older patients: impact of age at procedure[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2015, 8(4): 600-606.
[14] Chen L, Bai Y, Wang FY, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects improves cardiac remodeling and function of adult patients with permanent atrial fibrillation[J]. Chin Med J(Engl), 2015, 128(6): 780-783.
[15] Djer MM, Saputro DD, Putra ST, et al. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus: 11 years of clinical experience in cipto mangunkusumo hospital, jakarta, indonesia[J]. Pediatr Cardiol, 2015, 36(5): 1070-1074.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘亚军,袁强,吴静晔,韩晓光,郎昭,张勇. 130例锥形束CT影像腰椎椎弓根螺钉自动规划的初步分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 80-89.
[2]	张新莲,吕霞,贾婷婷,孙志新,李青,张风河. 50例正颌外科手术中手套穿孔情况分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(6): 83-86.
[3]	吴昊,徐克,韩靓,徐菲菲,王东琴,达鹏,殷勇. 改良颈腮腺入路切除咽旁间隙高位良性肿瘤[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(12): 72-76.
[4]	刘华水,段升军,赵国辉,张朕,朱礼明,王学光,贾逢爽,刘士懂,刘珉岑,李明,陈华. 骨科手术机器人辅助微创治疗骨盆环损伤108例临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(11): 52-59.
[5]	李岩,郭珺,王荣祺,刘永玲. 难治性癫痫相关Sturge-Weber综合征7例临床及病理分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(4): 91-95.
[6]	王谋龙,陈永坤,邢德广,曲良锁,王成伟. 经颅多普勒超声早期预测动脉瘤夹闭术后迟发性脑缺血的临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(11): 38-41.
[7]	黄乃邦, 达鹏, 卢军, 吴昊. 不同下颌骨截骨方式在咽相关区域肿瘤手术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(8): 79-82.
[8]	高南南, 陈栋, 于永慧, 张丽丽. 血清生物学标志物在新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎手术评估中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(6): 73-76.
[9]	潘国政, 由法平, 王帅, 卜庆敖, 袁庆忠. 目标导向性液体治疗对老年患者腹部外科手术的影响[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(6): 82-85.
[10]	李冰, 费昶, 郭锋, 孙爱刚, 郇林春, 郭守忠, 刘于海. 电磁导航和术中B超辅助下功能区脑动静脉畸形显微外科治疗[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(4): 80-82.
[11]	王春来, 徐淑军, 王洪亮, 尚景瑞. 神经内镜下外伤性脑脊液鼻漏修补的临床研究[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(3): 69-72.
[12]	张杰, 王志刚, 王益华, 姜彬, 何伟, 殷鑫, 郭文强. 儿童颅内动静脉畸形出血的临床特点及治疗分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(2): 56-60.
[13]	冯致余, 郭锐, 杨彦亮, 李海明, 董明亮, 徐惠惠, 刘义敏, 郭凯, 王广震, 王辉. 右心室-肺动脉连接在分期治疗肺动脉闭锁/室间隔缺损中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(11): 41-45.
[14]	陈普艳. 围手术期亲情护理在手术室护理管理中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(Z1): 178-179.
[15]	叶飞, 陈利超, 吴元龙, 邹济华. 36例腋下小切口动脉导管结扎治疗动脉导管未闭体会[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(S2): 96-96.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed