您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报（医学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (9): 18-21.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.545

• • 上一篇    下一篇

腹主动脉球囊阻断术在凶险性前置胎盘剖宫产中的作用

张春华,左常婷,王谢桐   

  1. 山东大学附属省立医院妇产科, 山东 济南 250021
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-16 出版日期:2016-09-10 发布日期:2016-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 左常婷. E-mail:zuochangting@126.com E-mail:zuochangting@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省科技发展计划(2014GSF118088);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2013HM067)

Prophylactic abdominal aorta arteries balloon occlusion in cesarean section for pernicious placenta previa and placenta increta in third trimester

ZHANG Chunhua, ZUO Changting, WANG Xietong   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Received:2016-05-16 Online:2016-09-10 Published:2016-09-10

PDF (PC)

720

摘要： 目的 探讨腹主动脉球囊阻断术在凶险性前置胎盘剖宫产中的作用。 方法 回顾性分析2003年3月至2016年3月山东大学附属省立医院产科收治的140例凶险性前置胎盘。术前预置腹主动脉球囊应用于凶险性前置胎盘剖宫产的111例患者为观察组,未行腹主动脉球囊阻断的凶险前置胎盘患者29例为对照组。采用两独立样本t检验及χ2检验分析两组术中出血量、输血量、子宫切除率及术后感染、新生儿窒息率情况。 结果 观察组与对照组比较,术中出血量分别为(2 139.19±1 533.748)mL、(3 968.97±3 103.811)mL;输血量分别为(1 713.06±1 391.495)mL和(3 237.93±2 461.186)mL;差异均有统计学意义(P=0.004, P=0.003);观察组与对照组子宫切除率分别为18.01%(20/111)、79.31%(23/29),差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),观察组子宫切除率明显下降。观察组与对照组术后感染率、新生儿窒息率比较差异均无统计学意义(P=1.000, P=0.634)。 结论 腹主动脉球囊阻断术可有效控制植入性凶险性前置胎盘的术中出血及输血量,降低子宫切除率。

关键词: 腹主动脉, 胎盘植入, 凶险性前置胎盘, 球囊阻断

Abstract: Objective To explore the efficacy of prophylactic abdominal aorta arteries balloon occlusion in cesarean section for pernicious placenta previa and placenta increta. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted in 140 cases of pernicious placenta previa and placenta increta admitted to our hospital during March 2003 and March 2016. The study group(n=111)underwent prophylactic abdominal aorta arteries balloon placement before cesarean section and occlusion after delivery. The control group(n=29)received conventional haemostasis druring cesarean section. The amount of blood loss and blood transfusion during operation, hysterectomy rate, infection rate and neonatal asphyxia rate of the two groups were compared with T test or Chi-square test. Results The volume of intraoperative hemorrhage and volume of intraoperative blood transfusion in the study group and control group were(2 139.19±1 533.748)mL vs(3 968.97±3 103.811)mL,(1 713.06±1 391.495)mL vs(3 237.93±2 461.186)mL,(P=0.004, P=0.003). The hysterectomy rate in the study group and control group was 18.01%(20/111)vs 79.31%(23/29),(P<0.001). There was no statistical difference in the infection rate and neonatal asphyxia rate(P=1.000, P=0.634). Conclusion Prophylactic abdominal aorta arteries balloon occlusion is effective in reducing intraoperative blood loss, transfusion and hysterectomy rate in patients with pernicious placenta previa and placenta increta.

Key words: Pernicious placenta previa, Balloon occlusion, Abdominal aorta arteries, Placenta increta

中图分类号: 

  • R714.7
[1] Chattopadhyay SK, Kharif H, Sherbeeni MM. Placenta praevia and accrete after previous caesarean section[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,1993, 52(3): 151-156.
[2] Huang G, Zhou R, Hu Y. A new suture technique for cesarean delivery complicated by hemorrhage in cases of placenta previa accreta[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2014, 124(3): 262-263.
[3] Silver RM, Fox KA, Barton JR, et al. Centre of excellence for placenta accreta[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 212(5): 561-568.
[4] Hull AD, Moore TR. Multiple repeat cesareans and the threat of placenta accreta: incidence, diagnosis, management[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2011, 38(2): 285-296.
[5] Arduini M, Epicoco G, Clerici G. B-Lynch suture, intrauterine balloon, and endouterine hemostatic suture for the management of postpartum hemorrhage due to placentaprevia accrete[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2010, 108(3): 191-193.
[6] Hwu YM, Chen CP, Chen HS, et al. Parallel vertical compression sutures: a technique to control bleeding from placenta praevia or accreta during caesarean section[J]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 2005, 112(10): 1420-1423.
[7] Clausen C, Stensballe J, Albrechtsen CK, et al. Balloon occlusion of the internal iliac arteries in the multidisciplinary management of placenta percreta[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2013, 92(4): 386-391.
[8] Shrivastava V, Nageotte M, Major C, et al. Case-control comparison of cesarean hysterectomy with and without prophylactic placement of intravascular balloon catheters for placenta accrete[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 197(4): 402.e1-5.
[9] Levine AB, Kuhlman K, Bonn J. Placenta accreta: Comparison of cases managed with and without pelvic artery balloon catheters[J]. J Matern Fetal Med, 2009, 8(4): 173-176.
[10] Soyer P, Morel O, Fargeaudou Y, et al. Value of pelvic embolization in the management of severe postpartum hemorrhage due to placenta accreta, increta or percreta[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2010, 80(3): 729-735.
[11] Palacios Jaraquemada JM, García Mónaco R, Barbosa NE, et al. Lower uterine blood supply: extrauterine anastomotic system and its application in surgical devascularization techniques[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2007, 86(2): 228-234.
[12] Ramoni A, Strobl EM, Tiechl J, et al. Conservative managementof abnormally invasive placenta: four case reports[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2013, 92(4): 468-471.
[13] National Radiological Protection Board. Board statement on diagnostic medical exposures to ionizing radiation during pregnancy[M]. Documents of the NRPB 4(4). London: HMSO, 1993.
[1] 王皓正,张文雄. Q热伴胸腹主动脉瘤支架植入术后感染1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 126-130.
[2] 卫任,郭伟. 腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗现状[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 13-18.
[3] 史潇兮,辛世杰. 腹主动脉瘤的开放手术[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 26-29.
[4] 霍正坤,孔祥骞,吴学君. 感染性主动脉瘤诊疗进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 42-48.
[5] 周永康,孙境,张帅,钱向阳. 胸腹主动脉瘤开放修复脊髓保护策略的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 49-54.
[6] 范立彬,张鸿坤. 腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后Ⅱ型内漏的预防及治疗进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 55-60.
[7] 牛帅,吴学君. 铁死亡在腹主动脉瘤中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 74-79.
[8] 孙境,张帅,齐红霞,李远,周永康,胡可鉴,钱向阳. 常温自身动脉转流内脏优先策略在胸腹主动脉置换手术中的脊髓保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 80-85.
[9] 王浙宇,许懿,赵昌波,杨硕菲,倪其泓,陈佳佺,王韦仑,李一男,郭相江,叶猛,张岚,薛冠华. 腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后发生髂支闭塞的危险因素及处理对策[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 101-107.
[10] 瞿进,曾照祥,何孟伟,霍威学,张恒,陆烨,田文,冯睿. 胸腹主动脉夹层瘤和退行性胸腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗结果对比研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 14-21.
[11] 王玉涛,孙岩. 单细胞转录组学与机器学习综合分析揭示腹主动脉瘤潜在生物标志物[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 40-53.
[12] 张红媛,顾永忠,侯哲. 产科47例子宫切除的临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 96-100.
[13] 徐荣坤,王连雷,原所茂,田永昊,刘新宇. 腰椎术中腹主动脉损伤1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 121-124.
[14] 张晓慧,潘正论. 动脉瘤周围腹膜后纤维化1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 117-120.
[15] 王颖,顾慧,于鑫鑫,胡锦卓,王箬芃,王锡明. 71例腹主动脉瘤的基线CT特征与病变进展的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(10): 62-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发