您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (11): 86-91.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2014.298

• 医学心理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

精神分裂症患者青少年亲属生态学执行功能特征及其与侵害的关系

李阳1, 曹枫林1, 钟耕坤2, 林萍珍1, 梁鑫浩1,2   

  1. 1. 山东大学护理学院, 山东 济南 250012;
    2. 山东省精神卫生中心, 山东 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-08 发布日期:2014-11-10
  • 通讯作者: 曹枫林.E-mail:caofenglin2008@126.com E-mail:caofenglin2008@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金(ZR2013HM087);山东大学创新基金重点项目(IFW12113)

Ecological executive function in adolescent relatives of schizophrenia patients and its relationship with victimization

LI Yang1, CAO Fenglin1, ZHONG Gengkun2, LIN Pingzhen1, LIANG Xinhao1,2   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Shandong Mental Health Center, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
  • Received:2014-05-08 Published:2014-11-10

摘要: 目的 探讨精神分裂症患者青少年亲属生态学执行功能特征,以及是否存在特定的侵害类型与该人群执行功能改变相关联.方法 选取104名精神分裂症患者的青少年子女或同胞作为亲属组和193名正常青少年作为对照组,采用执行功能行为评定量表自评版(BRIEF-SR)和青少年侵害问卷自评版(JVQ)分别评估被试的生态学执行功能和侵害发生情况.结果 亲属组在转换和任务完成因子上的得分高于对照组(均P<0.05);在亲属组中,经历一般侵害的青少年在计划/组织和任务完成因子上得分高于未经历一般侵害的被试(均P<0.05),经历儿童虐待的被试在抑制、情绪控制及材料组织因子上得分高于未经历儿童虐待的被试(均P<0.05).结论 精神分裂症患者的青少年亲属在转换和任务完成等执行功能成分上存在缺陷,一般侵害和儿童虐待与该人群执行功能改变有关.

关键词: 执行功能, 精神分裂症, 一级亲属, 青少年, 侵害

Abstract: Objective To investigate specific executive deficits in the real-life environment among adolescent relatives of schizophrenia patients and to explore the effect of specific victimization types on the deficits. Methods The study included 104 non-affected adolescent descendants and siblings of schizophrenia patients in the relative group and 193 healthy adolescents in the healthy control group, all aged between 9 and 20 years. All participants completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Self Report Version (BRIEF-SR) and Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire, Child Self-report Version (JVQ). Results The multivariate analysis revealed that the relative group reported more difficulties on the shift and task completion scale than controls (P<0.05). Significant main effects were detected for conventional crime on the plan/organize and task completion scale (P<0.05) and for child maltreatment on the inhibit, emotional control, monitor, working memory and organization of material scale (P<0.05). The univariate analysis revealed that in the relative group, adolescents who had experienced conventional crime reported higher scores on the plan/organize and task completion scale compared with those without conventional crime (P<0.05); adolescents with child maltreatment had higher scores on the Inhibit, emotional control, and organization of material scale than those without child maltreatment (P<0.05). For the healthy controls, adolescents with child maltreatment showed poorer scores on the Working Memory scale than those without maltreatment (P<0.05). Conclusion Our resultssuggest certain impaired aspects of executive functioning in real-life situations among adolescent relatives of schizophrenia patients. Conventional crime and child maltreatment may be associated with executive dysfunction in the adolescent relatives.

Key words: Schizophrenia, First-degree relatives, Executive function, Victimization, Adolescents

中图分类号: 

  • R749.3
[1] Heinrichs R W, Zakzanis K K. Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: a quantitative review of the evidence[J]. Neuropsychology, 1998, 12(3): 426-445.
[2] Mesholam-Gately R I, Giuliano A J, Goff K P, et al. Neurocognition in first-episode schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review [J]. Neuropsychology, 2009, 23(3): 315-336.
[3] Censits D M, Ragland J D, Gur R C, et al. Neuropsychological evidence supporting a neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia: a longitudinal study [J]. Schizophr Res, 1997, 24(3): 289-298.
[4] Jameson K G, Nasrallah H A, Northern T G, et al. Executive function impairment in first-degree relatives of persons with schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of controlled studies[J]. Asian J Psychiatry, 2011, 4(2):96-99.
[5] Keshavan M S, Diwadkar V A, Montrose D M, et al. Premorbid indicators and risk for schizophrenia: a selective review and update [J]. Schizophr Res, 2005, 79(1):45-57.
[6] Niemi L T, Suvisaari J M, Tuulio-Henriksson A, et al. Childhood developmental abnormalities in schizophrenia: evidence from high-risk studies [J]. Schizophr Res, 2003, 60(2-3):239-258.
[7] Seidman L J, Giuliano A J, Smith C W, et al. Neuropsychological functioning in adolescents and young adults at genetic risk for schizophrenia and affective psychoses: results from the Harvard and Hillside adolescent high risk studies [J]. Schizophr Bull, 2006, 32(3):507-524.
[8] Shaw P, Kabani N J, Lerch J P, et al. Neurodevelopmental trajectories of the human cerebral cortex [J]. J Neurosci, 2008, 28(14):3586-3594.
[9] Tsujimoto S. The prefrontal cortex: functional neural development during early childhood[J]. Neuroscientist, 2008, 14 (4):345-358.
[10] de la Serna E, Baeza I, Andres S, et al. Comparison between young siblings and offspring of subjects with schizophrenia: clinical and neuropsychological characteristics[J]. Schizophr Res, 2011, 131(1-3):35-42.
[11] Bhojraj T S, Diwadkar V A, Sweeney J A, et al. Longitudinal alterations of executive function in non-psychotic adolescents at familial risk for schizophrenia [J]. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry, 2010, 34(3):469-474.
[12] Ozan E, Deveci E, Oral M, et al. Neurocognitive functioning in a group of offspring genetically at high-risk for schizophrenia in Eastern Turkey[J]. Brain Res Bull, 2010, 82(3-4):218-223.
[13] McAuley T, Chen S, Goos L, et al. Is the behavior rating inventory of executive function more strongly associated with measures of impairment or executive function[J]. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 2010, 16(3): 495-505.
[14] De Bellis M D, Hooper S R, Spratt E G, et al. Neuropsychological findings in childhood neglect and their relation-ships to pediatric PTSD [J]. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 2009, 15(6): 868-878.
[15] DePrince A P, Weinzierl K M, Combs M D. Executive function performance and trauma exposure in a community sample of children [J]. Child Abuse Negl, 2009, 33(6): 353-361.
[16] Li Y, Dong F, Cao F, et al. Poly-victimization and executive functions in junior college students [J]. Scand J Psychol, 2013, 54: 485-492.
[17] 中华医学会精神科分会. 中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第3版[M]. 济南: 山东科学技术出版社, 2001.
[18] Guy R M, Isquith P K, Gioia G A. Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Self-Report Version Professional Manual [M]. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc, 2004.
[19] Gioia G A, Isquith P K. Ecological assessment of executive function in traumatic brain injury [J]. Dev Neuropsychol, 2004, 25(1-2): 135-158.
[20] 杜巧新, 钱英, 王玉凤. 执行功能行为评定量表成人版自评问卷的信效度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2010, 24(9): 674-679. DU Qiaoxin, QIAN Ying, WANG Yufeng. Reliability and validity of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Adult Version Self-Report Form in China [J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2010, 24(9): 674-679.
[21] 钱英, 王玉凤. 学龄儿童执行功能行为评定量表教师版信效度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2009, 23(10): 742-747. QIAN Ying, WANG Yufeng. Reliability and validity of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Teacher Form for School Age Children in China [J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2009, 23(10): 742-747.
[22] Hamby S L, Finkelhor D, Ormrod R K, et al. The Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire (JVQ): administration and scoring manual [M]. Durham, NH: Crimes against Children Research Center, 2005.
[23] 程培霞, 曹枫林, 刘佳佳, 等. 青少年侵害问卷自评版用于中学生的信度和效度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2010, 18(4): 460-462. CHENG Peixia, CAO Fenglin, LIU Jiajia. Reliability and Validity of Chinese Self-report Version of Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire in Middle School Students [J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2010, 18(4): 460-462.
[24] Diwadkar V A, Goradia D, Hosanagar A, et al. Working memory and attention deficits in adolescent offspring of schizophrenia or bipolar patients: comparing vulnerability markers[J]. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry, 2011, 35(5): 1349-1354.
[25] 钱英, 曹庆久, 王玉凤. 哌甲酯控释剂对注意缺陷多动障碍患儿生态学执行功能的影响[J]. 北京大学学报: 医学版, 2007, 39(3): 299-303. QIAN Ying, CAO Qingjiu, WANG Yufeng. Effect of extended-release methylphenidate on the ecological executive function for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [J]. Journal of Peking University: Health Sciences, 2007, 39(3): 299-303.
[1] 况利,徐何雁. 从精准评估到整合干预:儿童青少年心理健康问题诊疗范式的革新与展望[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 10-16.
[2] 樊呈敏,宋静雨,于书彦,毛雪琴. 舒肝解郁胶囊治疗青少年抑郁障碍的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 17-23.
[3] 李芳华,刘娜,李晓宇,许殿花,王倩. 儿童青少年抑郁障碍患者服药依从性研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 24-34.
[4] 方婷婷,胡章捷,禚凤,解欣然,杨楹,孔令华. 青少年网络偏差行为潜在剖面与网络分析——以江西省为例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 35-44.
[5] 常源,王帆,文颖,陈光辉. 父母心理控制、受欺凌与青少年非自杀性自伤的关系:自我同情的保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 55-64.
[6] 沈君,周爽,杜苗,蒋颖. 青少年情绪障碍患者及其照顾者病耻感与家庭复原力的关系:基于主客体互倚模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 65-77.
[7] 王倩,胡晓婧,王爱青,孙强,孟春燕,李芳华. 儿童青少年抑郁障碍患者非自杀性自伤文献的可视化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 93-107.
[8] 李鑫源,张心之,狄德润,原所茂,刘新宇,王连雷. Cobb角负重位三维自动成像与X线平片的对比分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 89-95.
[9] 黄艳,周应芳,彭超. 青少年子宫内膜异位症的管理要点和策略[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(10): 8-12.
[10] 解欣然,禚凤,杨楹,孔令华. 青少年抑郁障碍与多种心理行为问题的网络分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 49-58.
[11] 赵心睿, 李静雅, 孔令华, 李丛冉, 韦雨欢, 杨楹. 青少年抑郁障碍与网络成瘾的关系:社交回避和学业挫败感的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 65-71.
[12] 李佳博,欧阳江峰,杨丁,高京,孙强. 长效针剂在三省部分社区精神分裂症患者中的应用现状及存在问题[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(6): 107-113.
[13] 贾存显,刘珍珍. 关注睡眠问题,预防青少年自伤[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 1-7.
[14] 徐小明,孔裔婷,刘川,明英,况利. 青少年和年轻成人自杀预警系统研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 69-74.
[15] 庄大勇,贺青卿,李小磊,周鹏,岳涛,徐婧. 达芬奇机器人在儿童及青少年甲状腺癌中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 45-48.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!