您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (7): 98-105.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.0166

• 公共卫生与预防医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

山东省主动健康示范区域老年人慢病管理知信行现状及影响机制

郭艳童1,2,于媛媛1,2,陈莹莹1,2,付雨1,2,张伯韬1,2,袁莹1,2,孙爽爽1,2,赵英淇1,2,朱高培1,2,薛付忠1,2   

  1. 1.山东大学齐鲁医学院公共卫生学院生物统计学系, 山东 济南 250012;2.国家健康医疗大数据研究院, 山东 济南 250003
  • 发布日期:2024-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 薛付忠. E-mail:xuefzh@sdu.edu.cn朱高培. E-mail:zhugaopei717@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目(82330108);国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFC2003500);山东省重点研发计划项目(2021SFGC0504)

Current situation and influencing mechanism of knowledge, attitude and practice about chronic disease management among elderly people in Shandong Provinces proactive health demonstration area

GUO Yantong1,2, YU Yuanyuan1,2, CHEN Yingying1,2, FU Yu1,2, ZHANG Botao1,2, YUAN Ying1,2, SUN Shuangshuang1,2, ZHAO Yingqi1,2, ZHU Gaopei1,2, XUE Fuzhong1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. National Institute of Health Data Science of China, Jinan 250003, Shandong, China
  • Published:2024-09-20

PDF (PC)

375

摘要： 目的 探索山东省主动健康示范区域老年人慢病管理知信行水平及其影响机制。 方法 采用多阶段随机抽样方法,共抽取5 447名65岁以上的老年人进行问卷调查,采用t检验和单因素方差分析比较慢病管理知信行得分情况,并用多元线性回归模型分析其影响因素,以中介分析探讨其影响机制。 结果 山东省主动健康示范区域老年人慢病管理知识平均得分为7.47±2.83;态度平均得分为8.47±2.47;行为平均得分为4.94±1.79。回归分析表明,性别、年龄、居住方式、自评健康状况是知识的影响因素;年龄和居住方式影响态度,而性别和年龄是行为的影响因素。中介分析显示,慢病管理知识对态度(β=0.670 1,P<0.001)、行为意愿(β=0.046 8,P<0.01)和行为(β=0.305 6,P<0.001)均具有预测作用,态度对行为意愿(β=0.169 8,P<0.001)和行为(β=0.216 1,P<0.001)具有预测作用,行为意愿正向预测行为(β=0.029 1,P<0.05)。知识对行为的直接效应值为0.193 9,占总效应的56.46%,间接效应值为0.149 5,占总效应的43.54%。 结论 山东省主动健康示范区域老年人慢病管理知识和态度水平均较高,但行为转化水平有待进一步提高;慢病管理态度、行为意愿在知识和行为之间起中介作用,且态度还可以通过提升行为意愿来改善行为水平。

关键词: 老年人, 慢病管理, 知识, 态度, 行为意愿, 行为

Abstract: Objective To explore the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice and its influential mechanism of chronic disease management among the elderly in the proactive health demonstration area of Shandong Province, China. Methods Using a multi-stage random sampling approach, a total of 5 447 elderly people aged ≥65 were selected for questionnaire survey. T-test and one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA)were used to compare the scores of knowledge, attitude, and practice in chronic disease management. A multiple linear regression model was performed to analyze the influencing factors, and mediation analysis was used to explore the influencing mechanism. Results In the proactive health demonstration area of Shandong Province, the average knowledge score was 7.47±2.83, the average attitude score was 8.47±2.47, and the average practice score was 4.94±1.79. Regression analysis revealed that gender, age, living style, and self-assessed health status were the influencing factors of knowledge; age and living style were influencing factors of attitude; gender and age were influencing factors of practice. The mediation analysis showed that knowledge had predictive effect on attitude(β=0.670 1, P<0.001), behavioral intention(β=0.046 8, P<0.01), and practice(β=0.305 6, P<0.001). Attitude had predictive effect on behavioral intention (β=0.169 8, P<0.001)and practice (β=0.216 1, P<0.001), and behavioral intention positively predicts practice (β=0.029 1, P<0.05). The direct effect value of knowledge on practice was 0.193 9, accounting for 56.46% of the total effect. The value of indirect effect was 0.149 5, accounting for 43.54% of the total effect. Conclusion The level of knowledge and attitude about chronic disease management among the elderly in the proactive health demonstration area of Shandong Province is relatively high, but the level of behavioral transformation needs to be further improved. Attitude and behavioral intention towards chronic disease management play a mediatory role between knowledge and practice, and attitude can also improve the level of practice by changing the behavioral intention.

Key words: Elderly people, Chronic disease management, Knowledge, Attitude, Behavioral intention, Practice

中图分类号: 

  • R195
[1] 国家统计局, 国务院第七次全国人口普查领导小组办公室. 第七次全国人口普查公报(第五号): 人口年龄构成情况[J]. 中国统计, 2021(5): 10-11.
[2] 国家卫生健康委, 教育部, 科技部, 等. 关于印发“十四五”健康老龄化规划的通知[J]. 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会公报, 2022(2): 16-25.
[3] 郝文婷, 李洁, 景正月, 等. 衰弱在农村慢性病老年人睡眠质量与生活质量间的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2021, 59(2): 102-107. HAO Wenting, LI Jie, JING Zhengyue, et al. Physical frailty as a mediator between sleep quality and quality of life in rural elderly with chronic diseases in Shandong Province, China[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2021, 59(2): 102-107.
[4] 谭忠良. 社区健康管理结合健康教育对老年高血压的控制效果[J]. 中国社区医师, 2021, 37(35): 158-159. TAN Zhongliang. The control effect of community health management combined with health education on senile hypertension[J]. Chinese Community Doctors, 2021, 37(35): 158-159.
[5] Zhang XM, Li CY, Liu M, et al. The mediation effect of health literacy on social support and health lifestyle of patients with chronic diseases[J]. Appl Nurs Res, 2024, 75: 151763.
[6] 胡秀静, 吴小亚, 王家骥, 等. 慢性病防治视角下的我国医养结合与健康管理发展回顾[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2019, 27(8): 561-564.
[7] Hong E, Mao J, Ke ZC, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards community-acquired pneumonia and COVID-19 among general population: a cross-sectional study[J]. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 2024, 13(1): 6.
[8] Jeong JY, Lee H. Determinants of restaurant consumers intention to practice COVID-19 preventive behavior: an application of the theory of planned behavior[J]. Nutr Res Pract, 2021, 15(Suppl 1): S79-S93.
[9] Youngcharoen P, Vincent C, Park CG. Theory of planned behavior constructs associated with nurses pain assessment and pro Re Nata(PRN)opioid analgesic administration: a cross-sectional study[J]. Pain Manag Nurs, 2017, 18(3): 153-169.
[10] Abdi IH, Firdos R, Ali Laghari Q, et al. Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in geriatric patients(>60 years of age)[J]. Prof Med J, 2020, 27(1): 62-67.
[11] Entriken C, Pritts TA. Perioperative pulmonary support of the elderly[J]. Curr Geriatr Rep, 2021, 10(4): 167-174.
[12] Alkaabi I, Abita M, Mahdi Y, et al. Knowledge, attitude, practices, and sources of information(KAPS)toward COVID-19 during the second wave pandemic among university population in Qatar: a cross-sectional study[J]. Front Public Health, 2022, 10: 906159. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.906159.
[13] Doan DA, Ho HH, Tran LD, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of university students regarding COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in Vietnam[J]. BMC Public Health, 2022, 22(1): 2016.
[14] Aldhamy H, Maniatopoulos G, McCune VL, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of infection prevention and control precautions among laboratory staff: a mixed-methods systematic review[J]. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 2023, 12(1): 57.
[15] Wang WW, Peng YY, Tang KQ, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among middle-aged and elderly population towards ultrasound screening for strokes[J]. J Multidiscip Healthc, 2024, 17: 147-157. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S44.3865.
[16] Yazew BG, Abate HK, MekonnenE CK. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards COVID-19 in Ethiopia: asystematic review; 2020 [J]. Patient Prefer Adherence, 2021, 15: 337-348. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S288186.
[17] Conner M, Norman P. Understanding the intention-behavior gap: the role of intention strength[J]. Front Psychol, 2022, 13: 923464. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923464.
[18] Mukosha M, Muyunda D, Mudenda S, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards cervical cancer screening among women living with human immunodeficiency virus: implication for prevention strategy uptake[J]. Nurs Open, 2023, 10(4): 2132-2141.
[19] 王琢, 韩严敏, 张健, 等. 老年传染病防治知信行现状及影响因素[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2023, 43(23): 5869-5873.
[20] Liu LF, Qian XJ, Chen Z, et al. Health literacy and its effect on chronic disease prevention: evidence from Chinas data[J]. BMC Public Health, 2020, 20(1): 690.
[21] Yang KH, Liu H, Ma LH, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of residents in the prevention and control of COVID-19: an online questionnaire survey[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2021, 77(4): 1839-1855.
[22] 阚超杰, 张晓. 应用Fairlie分解法的老年人自评健康状况性别差异研究[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2019, 23(1): 75-79. KAN Chaojie, ZHANG Xiao. Disparity in self-rated health between male and female elderly: a Fairlie decomposition analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention, 2019, 23(1): 75-79.
[23] 陆一鸣, 朱泽善, 文建强, 等. 2015年甘肃省15~69岁居民健康素养水平及影响因素研究[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2018, 22(3): 235-239. LU Yiming, ZHU Zeshan, WEN Jianqiang, et al. Health literacy and associated factors among residents aged 15-69 years in Gansu, 2015[J]. Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention, 2018, 22(3): 235-239.
[24] 宋江宇, 周素红, 柳林, 等. 日常活动视角下居民健康影响的性别差异: 以广州为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(7): 999-1010.
[25] 刘清, 王志, 徐春华, 等. 奉贤区老年护理院护工传染病防治素养及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(4): 420-422.
[26] 王兴华, 李倩, 周虎. 2013年芜湖市镜湖区居民健康素养调查报告[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2014, 18(8): 768-771. WANG Xinghua, LI Qian, ZHOU Hu. Investigation on health literacy levels of residents in Jinghu District of Wuhu City, 2013[J]. Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention, 2014, 18(8): 768-771.
[27] Chowdhury SR, Chandra Das D, Sunna TC, et al. Global and regional prevalence of multimorbidity in the adult population in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. eClinicalMedicine, 2023, 57: 101860. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101860.
[28] Rakhshani T, Dada M, Kashfi SM, et al. The effect of educational intervention on knowledge, attitude, and practice of women towards breast cancer screening[J]. Int J Breast Cancer, 2022, 2022: 5697739. doi:10.1155/2022/5697739.
[29] 尹淑英, 梁亚楠, 纪晓倩, 等. 山东省农村不同性别老年人健康状况及影响因素[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2021, 41(9): 1965-1967.
[30] Clark CR, Ommerborn MJ, Moran K, et al. Predicting self-rated health across the life course: health equity insights from machine learning models[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2021, 36(5): 1181-1188.
[31] Kananen L, Enroth L, Raitanen J, et al. Self-rated health in individuals with and without disease is associated with multiple biomarkers representing multiple biological domains[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 6139.
[32] Reinwarth AC, Wicke FS, Hettich N, et al. Self-rated physical health predicts mortality in aging persons beyond objective health risks[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1): 19531.
[33] Yang HL, Deng Q, Geng QS, et al. Association of self-rated health with chronic disease, mental health symptom and social relationship in older people[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 14653.
[34] Stodolska A, Zawisza K, Wizner B, et al. Neglect and self-rated health among older adults-a cross-sectional study in Poland[J]. Folia Med Cracov, 2023, 63(2): 5-28.
[35] Li H, Zhang JY, Wang L, et al. A health promoting-lifestyle prediction model for dementia prevention among Chinese adults: based on the health belief model[J]. BMC Public Health, 2022, 22(1): 2450.
[36] 于瑞莹, 李庆信, 张浩然, 等. “健康中国”背景下不同群体老年人健康管理认知现状调查与对策[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2022, 40(22): 126-129.
[1] 宋东玉,吕靖然,李玉丽,刘宇舟. 基于安德森模型的城市中老年人隔代抚养培训需求影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(6): 108-115.
[2] 古玥琳,肖晓. 小鼠二选一赌博实验范式设计及验证[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 1-10.
[3] 王少虎,牟鑫,许程飞,赵颖馨,张华. 老年人颈动脉狭窄与脑白质结构网络拓扑属性的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 72-77.
[4] 董相君,李娟,孔雪,李培龙,赵文静,梁怡然,王丽丽,杜鲁涛,王传新. 环状RNA hsa_circ_0008591对乳腺癌细胞生物学行为的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 78-87.
[5] 刘萌,侯丛哲,麻焕玉,张震,赵新蕊,张萍,朱琳. β-雌二醇对宫颈癌Hela细胞增殖的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 9-15.
[6] 仇一帆,王子涵,高婷婷,王西艳,孙燕,刘粉,亓倩,董亮. 314例戒烟门诊患者戒烟效果及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(10): 88-94.
[7] 李献云,杨甫德. 自杀倾向的认知行为治疗[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 1-9.
[8] 申雨霏,赵美,胡宓. 有自杀意念中学生的求助意愿、求助行为现状及其相关因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 99-106.
[9] 赵思博,彭立,凌鸿翔. 农村老年人医疗保险参与和自杀风险的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 113-118.
[10] 苏永刚,王睿,杨同卫. 健康中国视域下老年人群自杀的影响因素及预防对策[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 8-13.
[11] 于书卷,王美娟,陈丽,曹英娟,吕晓燕,刘雪燕,林鹏,颜景政. 老年2型糖尿病患者轻度认知功能障碍的影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(11): 108-112.
[12] 姚志英,魏艳欣,汪心婷,张杰,贾存显. 农村居民自杀行为暴露与自杀未遂关系的研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(1): 86-92.
[13] 姜震,孙静,邹雯,王唱唱,高琦. 基于两种机器学习算法的双相情感障碍患者自杀行为影响因素模型比较研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(1): 101-108.
[14] 王辛,郭丹,梁佳瑞,郭丽,王健. 社会资本对老年人健康促进行为的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 97-103.
[15] 林玉玺,李传玺,王霖,马伟. 男男性行为人群性取向告知与艾滋病病毒检测:社会规范与自我效能的链式中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(3): 113-119.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 丁祥云,于清梅,张文芳,庄园,郝晶. 胰岛素样生长因子II在84例多囊卵巢综合征患者颗粒细胞中的表达和促排卵结局的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 60 -66 .
[2] 郭志华,赵大庆,邢园,王薇,梁乐平,杨静,赵倩倩. Ⅰ期端端吻合术治疗重度颈段气管狭窄临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 72 -76 .
[3] 李新钢,张鑫,陈安静. 当代脑计划研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 5 -9, 21 .
[4] 胡友斌,张叶三. Robert子宫合并阴道闭锁1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(9): 113 -115 .
[5] 胡思翠,孙清,王一冰,孙莉莉,隋炎希,李堂. Bartter综合征二例家系报告与CLCNKB基因突变分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(9): 64 -70 .
[6] 王剑,周文婧,薛知易,刘晓菲. 脑胶质母细胞瘤模型研究概况及类脑模型的研发应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 74 -80 .
[7] 冀永娟,项紫霓,匡桂芳. 青岛市两所三甲医院医务人员职业倦怠对生活质量影响的路径分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 102 -107 .
[8] 张宝文,雷香丽,李瑾娜,罗湘俊,邹容. miR-21-5p靶向调控TIMP3抑制2型糖尿病肾病小鼠肾脏系膜细胞增殖及细胞外基质堆积[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 7 -14 .
[9] 赵继宗. 神经外科学是脑科学研究的一支主力军[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 1 -4 .
[10] 李宁,李娟,谢艳,李培龙,王允山,杜鲁涛,王传新. 长链非编码RNA AL109955.1在80例结直肠癌组织中的表达及对细胞增殖与迁移侵袭的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 38 -46 .
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发