您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (11): 33-37.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2022.0588

• 胸外科肺癌、食管癌微创诊治和加速康复专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

加速康复外科指导下微创食管癌切除术流程优化之齐鲁实践

孙振国,田辉*()   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁医院胸外科, 山东 济南 250012
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-13 出版日期:2022-11-01 发布日期:2022-11-04
  • 通讯作者: 田辉 E-mail:tianhuiql@126.com
  • 作者简介:孙振国，山东大学齐鲁医院胸外科副研究员，博士后，齐鲁卫生与健康杰出青年人才，美国约翰霍普金斯大学医学院联合培养博士。曾获得全球首届医疗品质提升大赛第1名，中国医院品质管理联盟特别突出贡献大奖。现任山东省疼痛医学会理事，山东省临床肿瘤学会肿瘤微创外科分会常务委员，山东省医学会胸外科分会学术发展学组委员兼秘书，山东省疼痛医学会加速康复外科专委会委员兼秘书，山东省研究型医院协会胸外科分会委员。擅长胸外科肺部肿瘤、食管肿瘤及纵膈肿瘤的诊疗原则及微创手术操作等。参编《胸外科疑难精要》中文版。以第一作者/通讯作者发表SCI论文8篇，累计影响因子40余分；作为项目负责人主持国家自然科学基金青年基金、中国博士后科学基金及山东省自然科学基金博士基金各1项，作为骨干成员承担国家重点研发计划项目子课题1项。获得国家发明专利1项
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81672292);国家自然科学基金(81802397);泰山学者工程专项经费资助(ts201712087);山东省重点研发计划(重大科技创新工程)(2020CXGC011303);中国博士后科学基金(2020M672073);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2017BH035)

Optimization of the procedures in minimally invasive esophagectomy: the Qilu practices

Zhenguo SUN,Hui TIAN*()   

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Received:2022-05-13 Online:2022-11-01 Published:2022-11-04
  • Contact: Hui TIAN E-mail:tianhuiql@126.com

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

19

摘要：

食管癌是我国常见的发病率及死亡率均较高的恶性肿瘤，手术治疗是食管癌最主要的治疗方式，随着腔镜技术的发展，目前微创食管癌切除术(MIE)正在逐步取代传统开放食管癌切除术。加速康复外科(ERAS)是食管外科领域新兴的研究方向，山东大学齐鲁医院胸外科在ERAS原则指导下，不断优化MIE相关操作流程，让患者尽可能舒适地度过围手术期。现将山东大学齐鲁医院胸外科开展的ERAS指导下MIE流程优化措施进行总结，以期为国内外胸外科同行提供一定的参考。

关键词: 食管癌, 微创食管癌切除术, 加速康复外科, 手术流程优化, 预后

Abstract:

Esophageal cancer, as a common malignant cancer with high morbidity and mortality, is mainly treated with surgery. With the development of endoscope technology, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is taking the place of open esophagectomy. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a new research area in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Guided with the principles of ERAS, our team has optimized the procedures of MIE to ensure that patients undergo the perioperative period smoothly. In this paper, we will summarize these optimized procedures of MIE in order to provide reference for thoracic surgeons.

Key words: Esophageal cancer, Minimally invasive esophagectomy, Enhanced recovery after Surgery, Optimized surgical procedures, Prognosis

中图分类号: 

  • R735.1
1 Siegel RL , Miller KD , Fuchs HE , et al. Cancer Statistics, 2021[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71 (1): 7- 33.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21654
2 Moody S , Senkin S , Islam SMA , et al. Mutational signatures in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from eight countries with varying incidence[J]. Nat Genet, 2021, 53 (11): 1553- 1563.
doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00928-6
3 Sun Z , Ji N , Zhao R , et al. Extrachromosomal circular DNAs are common and functional in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9 (18): 1464.
doi: 10.21037/atm-21-4372
4 Cerfolio RJ , Laliberte AS , Blackmon S , et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a consensus statement[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2020, 110 (4): 1417- 1426.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.036
5 van der Sluis PC , van der Horst S , May AM . Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269 (4): 621- 630.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003031
6 Gergen AK , Halpern AL , Helmkamp L , et al. Outcomes after converted minimally invasive to open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2021, 112 (5): 1593- 1599.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.11.025
7 Coelho FDS , Barros DE , Santos FA , et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2021, 47 (11): 2742- 2748.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.012
8 Zheng Y , Li Y , Liu X , et al. Minimally invasive versus open McKeown for patients with esophageal cancer: a retrospective study[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021, 28 (11): 6329- 6336.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10105-y
9 Ashok A , Niyogi D , Ranganathan P , et al. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to promote recovery following esophageal cancer resection[J]. Surg Today, 2020, 50 (4): 323- 334.
doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-01956-1
10 李树海, 田辉, 岳韦名, 等. ERAS理念指导下VATS肺癌根治术流程优化之齐鲁实践[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13 (3): 132- 135.
LI Shuhai , TIAN Hui , YUE Weiming , et al. The optimization of the procedures in VATS of lung cancer in Qilu practices[J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery (Electronic Edition), 2020, 13 (3): 132- 135.
11 Li L , Zhao L , He J , Han Z . Application of right bronchial occlusion under artificial pneumothorax in the thoracic phase of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy[J]. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2021, 27 (6): 339- 345.
doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00055
12 Li Q , Zhao M , Wu D , et al. Adverse outcomes of artificial pneumothorax under right bronchial occlusion for patients with thoracoscopic-assisted oesophagectomy in the prone position versus the semiprone position[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12, 919910.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.919910
13 Marshall K , McLaughlin K . Pain Management in thoracic surgery[J]. Thorac Surg Clin, 2020, 30 (3): 339- 346.
doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2020.03.001
14 Shang QX , Yang YS , Hu WP , et al. Prognostic significance and role of thoracic lymph node metastasis based on Chinese expert consensus in esophageal cancer[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2019, 7 (16): 381.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.07.63
15 亓磊, 田辉, 李林, 等. 微创食管癌切除术后淋巴结转移规律及预后分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11 (2): 98- 102.
QI Lei , TIAN Hui , LI Lin , et al. Clinicopathological features of lymph node metastasis and prognostic factors in esophageal cancer treated with minimally invasive esophagectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery (Electronic Edition), 2018, 11 (2): 98- 102.
16 Cui T , Zhang H , Yu T , et al. Pattern of recurrence in 428 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical surgery and its implication in postoperative radiotherapeutic clinical target volume[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11, 652365.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.652365.eCollection2021
17 Matsuda S , Kitagawa Y . The Potential of lymph node yield as a quality indicator of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021, 28 (1): 9- 10.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09146-6
18 Visser E , Markar SR , Ruurda JP , et al. Prognostic value of lymph node yield on overall survival in esophageal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269 (2): 261- 268.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002824
19 Li H , Fang W , Yu Z , et al. Chinese expert consensus on mediastinal lymph node dissection in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (2017 edition)[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10 (4): 2481- 2489.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.175
20 Lin Z , Chen W , Chen Y , et al. Achieving adequate lymph node dissection in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinomas by radical lymphadenectomy: Beyond the scope of numbers of harvested lymph nodes[J]. Oncol Lett, 2019, 18 (2): 1617- 1630.
21 Soeno T , Harada H , Hosoda K , et al. Lymph node progression and optimized node dissection of middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the latest therapeutic surgical strategy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2019, 26 (4): 996- 1004.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07190-5
22 田辉, 李树海, 李林, 等. 微创食管切除术质量控制之齐鲁实践[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2021, 59 (9): 78- 82.
TIAN Hui , LI Shuhai , LI Lin , et al. Quality control of minimally invasive esophagectomy in Qilu Hospital[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2021, 59 (9): 78- 82.
23 吕龙飞, 李林, 李树海, 等. 腔镜下细针导管空肠造瘘在微创McKeown食管癌切除术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2020, 58 (7): 77- 81.
LU Longfei , LI Lin , LI Shuhai , et al. Application of laparoscopic fine needle catheter jejunostomy in minimally invasive McKeown resection of esophageal cancer[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2020, 58 (7): 77- 81.
24 Hayashi M , Kawakubo H , Shoji Y , et al. Analysis of the effect of early versus conventional nasogastric tube removal on postoperative complications after transthoracic esophagectomy: a single-center, randomized controlled trial[J]. World J Surg, 2019, 43 (2): 580- 589.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4825-1
25 Tian Y , Li L , Li S , et al. Comparison of circular stapling, triangulating stapling and T-shape stapling for cervical anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2020, 8 (24): 1679.
doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7278
26 李树海, 岳韦名, 李林, 等. 胸腹腔镜联合食管癌切除术后颈部残胃闭锁端瘘的诊治经验[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2016, 3 (1): 56- 58.
LI Shuhai , YUE Weiming , LI Lin , et al. The experience of the treatment of cervical anastomotic leakage after combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery (Electronic Edition), 2016, 3 (1): 56- 58.
27 Young A , Alvarez Gallesio JM , Sewell DB , et al. Outcomes of robotic esophagectomy[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2021, 13 (10): 6163- 6168.
28 Daiko H , Oguma J , Fujiwara H , et al. Robotic esophagectomy with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy using four robotic arms alone in esophageal and esophagogastric cancer (RETML-4): a prospective feasibility study[J]. Esophagus, 2021, 18 (2): 203- 210.
29 Na KJ , Kang CH , Park S , et al. Robotic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis[J]. J Robot Surg, 2022, 16 (4): 841- 848.
30 Sarkaria IS , Rizk NP , Goldman DA , et al. Early quality of life outcomes after robotic-assisted minimally invasive and open esophagectomy[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2019, 108 (3): 920- 928.
[1] 郑苏,陈述花,李华,邓劼,陈春红,王晓慧,冯卫星,韩萧迪,张雨佳,李娜,李莫,方方. 脑电变化和BASED评分与54例婴儿痉挛症促肾上腺皮质激素疗效的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(9): 91-96.
[2] 王丽慧,高敏,孔北华. 子宫血管肉瘤2例报告并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(9): 108-112.
[3] 高中霞,张铭,樊明德,谭晨阳,王梦迪,王超,樊跃飞,丁守銮,王成伟. 伽玛刀治疗81例肺癌脑转移瘤的疗效及预后因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(8): 44-49.
[4] 贺士卿,李皖皖,董书晴,牟婧怡,刘宇莹,魏思雨,刘钊,张家新. 基于数据库构建乳腺癌焦亡相关基因的预后风险模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(8): 34-43.
[5] 张玉凤,徐敏,邢秀丽,逄曙光,户克庆. 689例非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床流行病学特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 118-122.
[6] 李琳琳,王凯. 基于生物信息学预测肝细胞癌预后基因[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(5): 50-58.
[7] 郑昊天,王光辉,赵小刚,王亚东,曾榆凯,杜贾军. 基于数据库LKB1突变肺腺癌DNA异常甲基化位点构建的预后风险模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 51-58.
[8] 王艳莉,冯晔,周秀耕,杨跃,吴楠,方玉,阎石,李少雷,吕超,韩超,杜松涛. 33例食管癌患者围术期补充乳清蛋白粉对术后并发症的预防作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 64-70.
[9] 孔林笑语,孙书珍,余丽春,贾梦文. 188例儿童系统性红斑狼疮5年生存率及预后分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(12): 69-76.
[10] 车国卫. 加速康复外科需要与时俱进[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(11): 17-22.
[11] 高树庚. 加速康复外科在肺癌围术期管理中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(11): 1-10.
[12] 韩丁培,严越,曹羽钦,孙昕,胡琰霞,汪敏娴,罗艳,施咏梅,谢青,杭钧彪,李鹤成. 加速康复外科理念在胸外科临床实践指导的瑞金医院专家共识[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(11): 11-16.
[13] 田辉,易文波,李树海. 达芬奇机器人食管癌切除术之齐鲁实践[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(11): 28-32.
[14] 朱永村,赵修世,孙楠楠,姚志刚,周星辰,牟坤. 前列腺透明细胞腺癌3例报道并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(11): 102-107.
[15] 时萧寒,李华玉,李峰. 接受Stupp方案治疗的老年胶质母细胞瘤患者预后的影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(10): 42-48.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙维彤,邹伟伟,李爱国,席延伟,张娜. 脂质体粒径对促进托氟啶口服吸收的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(6): 639 -642 .
[2] 于清梅,武玉玲,宋海岩,尹华伟,庄园 . p38丝裂原活化蛋白激酶在小鼠早期胚胎及围植入期子宫内膜的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(2): 123 -127 .
[3] 张勇,叶静,郭新星,肖水清. 牙周膜牵张成骨快速移动牙牙髓中IL-8表达的变化[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(4): 379 -381 .
[4] 高静,陈雯,张同霞,王小花,戴廷军,姚红,赵秀鹤,迟兆富,单培彦 . 颞叶癫痫大鼠海马线粒体细胞色素氧化酶亚基Ⅲ和Ⅳ表达的变化[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(8): 817 -820 .
[5] . 干细胞标记物LGR5在结直肠癌发生发展中的表达及意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(8): 85 -88 .
[6] 杨奎忠,孙雪飞,项继顺,杜庆聪,黄凤昌 . c-FLIP反义寡核苷酸对食管癌EC109细胞裸鼠移植瘤抑制作用的实验研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(12): 1234 -1238 .
[7] 俞新爽,韩俊庆,王兴文,盛巍,王瑜. 乳腺癌患者细胞免疫水平与预后危险因素的关系及临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(9): 934 -937 .
[8] 于渊1,李岩1,荣风年2,梁婧1,刘晓琳1,王福立1. 自体CIK细胞治疗对卵巢癌调节性T细胞的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(5): 101 -104 .
[9] 王海峰,史本康,张克勤,李永智,朱耀丰,王海新. B超检测的精索静脉直径及返流与术后精液质量的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(7): 751 -752 .
[10] 张元凯，刘培来，李德强，李明. 枢椎椎板螺钉联合寰椎侧块螺钉固定技术在复杂寰枢椎脱位中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(11): 98 .
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发