您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (11): 16-19.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2019.500

• • 上一篇    

老年功能区矢状窦旁巨大脑膜瘤的显微手术治疗

田海龙,危兆胜,刘斌,郭文强,张红英,王超超,王志刚   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛)神经外科, 山东 青岛 266000
  • 发布日期:2022-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 王志刚. E-mail:wzg1110@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省重点研发计划(2018GSF118107);青岛市医疗卫生优秀人才培养项目(QDYXQNRC-2017084)

Microsurgical resection of giant para-sagittal meningioma in the functional area in the elderly

TIAN Hailong, WEI Zhaosheng, LIU Bin, GUO Wenqiang, ZHANG Hongying, WANG Chaochao, WANG Zhigang   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital(Qingdao)of Shandong University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China
  • Published:2022-09-27

摘要: 目的 探讨显微手术切除老年矢状窦旁巨大脑膜瘤的临床效果。 方法 对2014年1月至2018年6月显微手术治疗的32例年龄>60岁[中位年龄(63.4±2.5)岁,最大年龄78岁]、累及功能区皮层的矢状窦旁巨大脑膜瘤(瘤径>5 cm)患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,了解神经电生理监测联合显微外科技术的手术效果,总结治疗方法及手术技巧。 结果 术前合并高血压11例、冠心病5例、糖尿病8例、颅内血管狭窄4例、脊髓空洞2例,无合并症2例;手术全程进行运动/感觉诱发电位监测;Simpson I级切除11例,Simpson II级切除9例(其中2例为复发脑膜瘤),Simpson III级切除9例(其中3例为复发脑膜瘤),Simpson IV级切除3例(其中2例为复发脑膜瘤)。对WHO病理分级II级、III级和肿瘤残留、肿瘤细胞呈增生活跃状态的I级脑膜瘤,术后常规进行放射治疗。随访4~43个月,其中1例随访11个月时复发,再次手术后辅助放射治疗。无手术死亡病例。术前以偏瘫、偏身感觉障碍为主要表现14例,经治疗后恢复12例,术前无偏瘫术后出现偏瘫3例,其中1例并发肺炎,治疗后在7~21 d内恢复;以癫痫为主要症状8例患者术后口服抗癫痫药物,均未再出现癫痫发作。 结论 显微手术切除功能区老年矢状窦旁巨大脑膜瘤,术中强调使用神经电生理监测技术,保护功能区皮层组织和引流静脉;老年患者术后并发症多,影响术后整体治疗质量,围手术期必须高度重视合并症和并发症的防治。

关键词: 矢状窦旁脑膜瘤, 功能区, 老年

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of microsurgery in the resection of giant para-sagittal meningioma in the elderly. Methods The clinical data of 32 elderly patients with giant meningioma(diameter >5 cm)involving the cortex of the functional area treated with microsurgery in our hospital during Jan. 2014 and Aug. 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients aged >60 years(mean 63.4±2.5 years, maximum 78 years). The clinical outcomes and surgical skills were summarized. Results Hypertension was detected in 11 cases, coronary heart disease in 5 cases, diabetes mellitus in 8 cases, intracranial vascular stenosis in 4 cases, syringomyelia in 2 cases, and 2 cases had no complications. Motor/sensory evoked potentials were monitored throughout the operation. Simpson I resection was performed in 11 cases, Simpson II resection in 9 cases(2 cases were recurrent meningioma), Simpson III resections in 9 cases(3 cases were recurrent meningioma), and Simpson IV resection in 3 cases(2 cases were recurrent meningioma). Patients with WHO II tumor, WHO III tumor, residual tumor, or meningioma with active proliferative tumor cells received radiotherapy after operation. During the follow-up of 4-43 months, 1 case had relapse in month 11 and recov- 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)57卷11期 -田海龙,等.老年功能区矢状窦旁巨大脑膜瘤的显微手术治疗 \=-ered after a second operation and adjuvant radiotherapy. In no-death cases during operation, 14 manifested with hemiplegia and hemidysesthesia, in which 12 recovered; 3 cases developed hemiplegia, 1 of which was complicated with pneumonia, and recovered after 7-21 days; 8 patients with epilepsy took antiepileptic drugs and no seizure recurred. Conclusion In the microsurgical excision of giant para-sagittal meningioma in elderly patients, the protection of cortex and drainage veins in functional area is very important. As the complications affect clinical outcomes, due attention should be paid to the perioperative comorbidities and complications.

Key words: Para-sagittal meningioma, Functional area, Elderly

中图分类号: 

  • R739.45
[1] Bateman BT, Pile-Spellman J, Gutin PH, et al. Meningioma resection in the elderly: nationwide inpatient sample, 1998-2002[J]. Neurosurgery, 2005, 57(5): 866-872.
[2] 陈福业, 周汉, 丰育功, 等. 非典型脑膜瘤74例临床预后分析[J]. 中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2018, 17(1): 46-50. CHEN Fuye, ZHOU Han, FENG Yugong, et al. Clinical prognosis analysis of 74 patients with atypical meningioma[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurosurgical Disease Research, 2018, 17(1): 46-50.
[3] 刘宏斌, 吴涛, 周厚杰, 等. 上矢状窦旁脑膜瘤显微手术治疗22例分析[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志, 2018, 23(3): 206-207. LIU Hongbin, WU Tao, ZHOU Houjie, et al. Microsurgical treatment of supra-sagittal meningioma: a report of 22 cases[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery, 2018, 23(3): 206-207.
[4] 杨勇灵. 显微手术治疗老年矢状窦旁及大脑镰旁脑膜瘤患者疗效[J].中国老年学杂志, 2014, 34(8): 4551-4553. YANG Yongling. The curative effect of microsurgery in elderly patients with perisagittal sinus meningioma and parafalx meningioma[J]. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 2014, 34(8): 4551-4553.
[5] 王志明, 袁进国, 曹藏柱, 等. 老年患者大型脑膜瘤手术治疗36例临床分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2009, 16(5): 436-437. WANG Zhiming, YUAN Jinguo, CAO Zangzhu, et al. Clinical analysis of 36 cases of large-scale meningioma in the elderly[J]. Chinese Oncology Clinical and Rehabilitation, 2009, 16(5): 436-437.
[6] Kleib AS, Ngaidé BH, Eleit AEM, et al. Surgical treatment of intracranial meningiomas in Nouakchott, Mauritania[J]. Pan Afr Med J, 2018, 31: 146. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.31.146.16485.
[7] Czigléczki G, Németh F, Berényi G,et al.Prognostic factors of surgically treated spinal meningeomas and long-term surgical outcomes[J]. Ideggyogy Sz, 2019, 72(3-4): 93-97.
[8] 赵鹏来, 罗正祥, 张岩松, 等. 中央回区矢状窦旁脑膜瘤的术前影响评估和显微外科治疗[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2015, 31(2): 184-187. ZHAO Penglai, LUO Zhengxiang, ZHANG Yansong, et al. Preoperative impact assessment and microsurgical treatment of apantral meningioma in the central gyrus region[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurosurgery, 2015, 31(2): 184-187.
[9] Kreβner M, Arlt F, Riepl W, et al. Prognostic factors of microsurgical treatment of intracranial meningiomas—a multivariate analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(10): e0202520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202520.
[10] Da Silva CE, de Freitas PEP. Surgical removal of skull base meningiomas in symptomatic elderly patients[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 120: e1149-1155. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.024.
[1] 董晓倩,李冠江,许倩倩,许洪伟. 66例经ERCP联合熊去氧胆酸治疗老年胆总管并胆囊结石患者与其他疗法比较[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(5): 59-66.
[2] 赵思博,彭立,凌鸿翔. 农村老年人医疗保险参与和自杀风险的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 113-118.
[3] 苏永刚,王睿,杨同卫. 健康中国视域下老年人群自杀的影响因素及预防对策[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 8-13.
[4] 叶艺,张洁,赵秋阁,范秀珍. 老年服务择业动机量表在毕业学年大学生中的修订及信效度检验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 75-80.
[5] 王辛,郭丹,梁佳瑞,郭丽,王健. 社会资本对老年人健康促进行为的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 97-103.
[6] 邢志群,李德军,赵宝,许春阳,纪洪生. 45例老年患者术后谵妄与乙酰胆碱酯酶活性及炎症指标关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(3): 92-97.
[7] 郝文婷,李洁,景正月,赵丹,袁叶敏,于才婷,周成超. 衰弱在农村慢性病老年人睡眠质量与生活质量间的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(2): 102-107.
[8] 吕岩,于潇,蔺新英,赵琦,王保珍. 聊城市老年女性膳食模式与抑郁症状的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(11): 103-108.
[9] 朱大伟,于保荣. 基于蒙特卡洛模拟的我国老年人长期照护需求测算[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(8): 82-88.
[10] 姜甜,于保荣,朱大伟. 老年长期照护保险制度的筹资来源和筹资标准[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(8): 95-102.
[11] 陈希,刘新宇,范立霞,田永昊,原所茂. 老年脊柱疾病应用颈动脉超声评估缺血性脑卒中风险的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(5): 48-55.
[12] 朱锡德,孟凡国,张建宁. 细孔钻颅微创治疗老年创伤性脑内血肿[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(3): 69-74.
[13] 王倩,徐凌忠,朱静,张娇,谢苏,于子航. 山东省农村老年高血压患者心理健康状况及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(1): 92-100.
[14] 袁华财,张甜甜,郭冬梅,张欢欢,沈德嫱,陈立勇,蔺新英. 微型营养评价量表在社区老年人群中的信效度评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(9): 77-82.
[15] 刘春红,田鑫雨,王得翔,石慧,肖伟. 全球肺功能倡议预计值对济南市老年人的适用性检验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(7): 46-50.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!