您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (9): 38-42.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2019.286

• • 上一篇    

加速康复外科指导下的多模式镇痛对开腹结肠癌患者术后恢复的影响

周嘉晖1,王刚2,刘江2,赵健3,王海锋3,江志伟1,2,3   

  1. 1. 南京医科大学金陵临床医学院, 江苏 南京 210002;2. 江苏省中医院普通外科, 江苏 南京 210029;3. 南京大学医学院附属金陵医院普通外科, 江苏 南京 210002
  • 发布日期:2022-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 江志伟. E-mail:surgery34@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81500417);江苏省社会发展项目(BE2015687)

Effects of multimodal analgesia under the guidance of enhanced recovery after open surgery on postoperative recovery of patients with colon cancer

ZHOU Jiahui1, WANG Gang2, LIU Jiang2, ZHAO Jian3, WANG Haifeng3, JIANG Zhiwei1,2,3   

  1. 1. Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu, China;
    2. Department of General Surgery, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China;
    3.Department of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu, China
  • Published:2022-09-27

摘要: 目的 探讨在加速康复外科(ERAS)理念指导下,应用多模式镇痛(MMA)对接受开腹结肠癌手术的患者术后恢复的影响。 方法 回顾性分析2018年7月~ 11月,南京大学医学院附属金陵医院普通外科62例行开腹结肠癌根治术的患者,其中多模式镇痛(MMA)组有31名患者,病人自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)组有31例患者。观察并比较两组患者术后的VAS评分、恢复情况及术后30 d并发症的发生率。 结果 MMA组患者对比PCIA组患者术后首次排气时间[(28.1±15.2)h vs(50.2±26.2)h,t=4.059,P<0.001]、首次排便时间[(38.9±19.4)h vs(62.6±25.8)h,t=4.085,P<0.001]、首次下床活动时间[(17.6±9.3)h vs(30.0±13.4)h,t=4.259,<0.001]、首次进食半流质时间[(21.3±9.5)h vs(60.6±27.0)h,t=7.652,P<0.001]及术后住院天数[(6.8±4.7)d vs(8.8±1.9)d,t=2.150,P=0.036]指标上均显示出优势;MMA组术后镇痛效果优于PCIA组;两组患者术后30 d内并发症的发生率差异无统计学意义。 结论 ERAS理念的指导下,开腹结肠癌患者术后应用MMA有利于术后的快速康复,镇痛效果好,且并未增加术后并发症的风险,是安全有效的。

关键词: 多模式镇痛, 结肠癌, 加速康复外科, 术后恢复

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of multimodal analgesia(MMA)on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing open colon cancer surgery under the guidance of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS). Methods The clinical data of 62 patients from Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University who underwent open colon cancer surgery during Jul. and Nov. 2018 were retrospective analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: multimodal analgesia group(MMA group, n=31)and the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia group(PCIA group, n=31). The visual analogue score(VAS), recovery and incidence of complications 30 days after surgery were observed and compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the PCIA group, the MMA group needed shorter time for the first flatus [(28.1±15.2)h vs(50.2±26.2)h,t=4.059,P<0.001], first defecation[(38.9±19.4)h vs(62.6±25.8 h,t=4.085,P<0.001], first off-bed activity[(17.6±9.3)h vs(30.0±13.4)h,t=4.259,<0.001], first semi-liquid meal[(21.3±9.5)h vs(60.6±27.0)h,t=7.652,P<0.001], and shorter postoperative stay [(6.8±4.7)d vs(8.8±1.9)d, 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)57卷9期 -周嘉晖,等.加速康复外科指导下的多模式镇痛对开腹结肠癌患者术后恢复的影响 \=-t=2.150,P=0.036]. The MMA group had better analgesia effect than the PCIA group, but there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups 30 days after surgery. Conclusion Under the guidance of ERAS, multimodal analgesia can help the patients recovery. It is safe and effective, without increasing the risk of postoperative complications.

Key words: Multimodal analgesia, Colon cancer, Enhanced recovery after surgery, Postoperative recovery

中图分类号: 

  • R619
[1] 王锡山. 中美结直肠癌流行病学特征及防诊治策略的对比分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2017, 6(6): 447-453.
[2] Kehlet H, Wilmore D. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery [J]. Ann Surg, 2008, 248(2): 189-198.
[3] 陈凛, 陈亚进, 董海龙, 等. 加速康复外科中国专家共识及路径管理指南(2018版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(1): 1-20.
[4] Sullivan D, Lyons M, Montgomery R, et al. Exploring opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia options in trauma: a nursing perspective [J]. J Trauma Nurs, 2016, 23(6): 361-375.
[5] Joshi GP, Bonnet F, Kehlet H. Evidence-based postoperative pain management after laparoscopic colorectal surgery [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2013, 15(2):146-155.
[6] 中华人民共和国卫生和计划生育委员会医政医管局. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2015版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2015, 14(6): 783-799.
[7] Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, et al. Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain(VAS Pain), numeric rating scale for pain(NRS Pain), mcgill pain questionnaire(MPQ), short-form mcgill pain questionnaire(SF-MPQ), chronic pain grade scale(CPGS), short form-36 bodily pain scale(SF-36 BPS), and Measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain(ICOAP)[J]. Arthritis Care Res(Hoboken), 2011, 63(Suppl 11): S240-252. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543.
[8] Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Wu CL, et al. Research gaps in practice guidelines for acute postoperative pain management in adults: findings from a review of the evidence for an american pain society clinical practice guideline [J]. J Pain, 2016, 17(2): 158-166.
[9] Jarzyna D, Jungquist CR, Pasero C, et al. American society for pain management nursing guidelines on monitoring for opioid-Induced sedation and respiratory depression [J]. Pain Manag Nurs, 2011, 12(3): 118-145.
[10] Beverly A, Kaye AD, Ljungqvist O, et al. Essential elements of multimodal analgesia in enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)guidelines [J]. Anesthesiol Clin, 2017, 35(2): e115-e143. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2017.01.018.
[11] Woolf CJ, American College of Physicians,American Physiological Society. Pain: moving from symptom control toward mechanism-specific pharmacologic management [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2004, 140(6): 441-451.
[12] 戴仁锋, 王伟娟, 刘英. 罗哌卡因局部浸润对全身麻醉下扁桃体摘除术后小儿躁动的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2016, 14(5): 736-738.
[13] Hofstad JK, Winther SB, Rian T, et al. Perioperative local infiltration anesthesia with ropivacaine has no effect on postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty [J]. Acta Orthop, 2015, 86(6): 654-658.
[14] Bekhit MH. Profile of extended-release oxycodone/acetaminophen for acute pain [J]. J Pain Res, 2015, 8: 719-728. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S73567.
[15] 刘艳君, 王鸾, 张文, 等. 氨酚羟考酮与盐酸曲马多在混合痔术后镇痛中的效果对比观察[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2018, 46(2):211-212.
[16] 崔向丽, 赵志刚, 陈丽, 等. 新型注射用选择性COX-2抑制剂帕瑞昔布钠[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2009, 18(14): 1283-1286.
[17] Essex MN, Xu H, Parsons B, et al. Parecoxib relieves pain and has an opioid-sparing effect following major gastrointestinal surgery [J]. Int J Gen Med, 2017, 10: 319-327. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S143837.
[18] Klein M. Postoperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and colorectal anastomotic leakage. NSAIDs and anastomotic leakage [J]. Dan Med J, 2012, 59(3): B4420.
[19] Huang Y, Tang SR, Young CJ. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis [J]. ANZ J Surg, 2018, 88(10): 959-965.
[20] Bruhn J, Scheffer GJ, van Geffen GJ. Clinical application of perioperative multimodal analgesia [J]. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care, 2017, 11(2): 106-111.
[21] De Oliveira GS, Almeida MD, Benzon HT, et al. Perioperative single dose systemic dexamethasone for postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Anesthesiology, 2011, 115(3): 575-588.
[22] Kassim DY, Esmat IM, Elgendy MA. Impact of duloxetine and dexamethasone for improving postoperative pain after laparoscopic gynecological surgeries: A randomized clinical trial [J]. Saudi J Anaesth, 2018, 12(1): 95-102.
[1] 甄秋来,吕欣然,叶辉,丁绪超,柴小雪,胡辛,周明,曹莉莉. 基于TCGA数据库预测结肠癌预后基因及其临床应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 64-71.
[2] 王波,熊颖,倪志福,屈振繁. 加速康复外科理念在1~3岁日间疝手术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(12): 92-96.
[3] 李玉杰,韩伟,黄炜,董玉科,李韬,党燕伟,蔡晓清,申晓,龚文丹,许连方. 加速康复外科在44例悬雍垂腭咽成形术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(11): 92-97.
[4] 支梦伟,江志伟,戴新娟,王刚,程伟. 加速康复外科指导下胃癌患者围手术期心率变异度的临床观察[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(11): 85-91.
[5] 洪甲庚,聂洋洋,苏国强. 丙泊酚对结肠癌细胞增殖、迁移及Wnt1和β-catenin表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(11): 53-58.
[6] 江志伟,周嘉晖,成汇. 多模式镇痛在加速康复外科中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(9): 1-4.
[7] 李乐平,崔怀平,商亮. 加速康复外科在胃肠外科手术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(9): 5-11.
[8] 宋西成,马加海. 加速康复外科理念下的麻醉管理[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(9): 12-17.
[9] 靖昌庆,王金申. 加速康复外科在胃肠外科应用中循证医学的重要作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(9): 18-23.
[10] 王刚,江志伟. 加速康复外科推广过程中面临的挑战与对策[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(9): 24-27.
[11] 房鹏,王刚,赵健,刘江,王海锋,周嘉晖,江志伟. 加速康复外科减少胃癌患者术后重症监护病房住院时间的临床观察[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(9): 28-32.
[12] 王海锋,王刚,赵健,刘江,周嘉晖,江志伟. 加速康复外科在直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(9): 33-37.
[13] 万秀霞,孙秀萍,佟晶洁. 大黄酚对结肠癌的抗肿瘤作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(5): 74-79.
[14] 高振文,杨淑萍,谢雪雪,宋伟. Yes相关蛋白与结肠癌病理因素的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(7): 57-64.
[15] 王贲士, 单军奇,侯庆生,公为鹏,朱振宇,郭洪亮. CD11b+/CD66b-表型髓系细胞在结肠癌进展和肝转移中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(10): 41-45.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!